Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • RT @curtdoolittle: SEX DIFFERENCES IN COGNITION – AND CONSEQUENCES Here is the s

    RT @curtdoolittle: SEX DIFFERENCES IN COGNITION – AND CONSEQUENCES
    Here is the short version:
    1. Science consists of the process of discov…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-10 19:51:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1800254588383019153

  • Simple Sex Differences in Cognition: 1. Specifics (emotions) can’t generalize (s

    Simple Sex Differences in Cognition:
    1. Specifics (emotions) can’t generalize (systems).
    2. Generalizations (distributions) can’t specify (individuals).


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-10 04:20:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1800020178908139885

    Reply addressees: @PlayerJuan96 @whatifalthist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1800017464908222860

  • Great question. Usually in either fears or utopias, not predictions. Wants and n

    Great question. Usually in either fears or utopias, not predictions. Wants and not-wants rather the predictions. “Getting people to do things” rather than doing things.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-10 04:06:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1800016650860671448

    Reply addressees: @whatifalthist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1800011636490776647

  • Just one note. I don’t know anything about you. So I can’t make any assumptions

    Just one note.
    I don’t know anything about you.
    So I can’t make any assumptions that would be relevant to your experience.
    But if you looked at all people in all fields by what they were doing wrong and making mistakes in an publishing nonsense what pattern would you then use to determine the constitution and behavior of scientific inquiry?
    Quite by accident I learned that the means of idetifying science, epistemology, logic, language, decidability, truth, morality, cooperation and conflict at all scales, is that I learned to study not what succeeded, but what failed and why. And for example, to learn truth by the study of lying.
    This make me and my team as well, experts in the logic of lying, of language, of truth, and of decidability – by study of the via negativa.
    So, if you were to look at science not by what you think you do or what scientists claim they do but by the errors and falsehoods and frauds they do, what would you think of science and how would you think of it differently?

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @Adam_W_Sawyer @ToKTeacher @DanielWhiteson @getairchat


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-08 22:06:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799563602736578560

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799555890678214819

  • “Guys get friend zoned and girls get f—k zoned.”– Interesting. Hadn’t seen it

    –“Guys get friend zoned and girls get f—k zoned.”–

    Interesting. Hadn’t seen it said that way before, but that’s about right.

    I mean, until we restore low (long) time preference for relationship and marriage instead of ‘entertainment’ this catastrophe is going to continue, and at current rates of reproductive delay and collapse — the whole developed world is going to fall apart.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-08 21:05:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799548335872786433

  • Data is quite clear (a) blacks have a minor bias to sociality (social stimulatio

    Data is quite clear
    (a) blacks have a minor bias to sociality (social stimulation) – it is the least complex, lowest cost means of stimulation, and have much lower self regulation.
    (b) Jews have the feminine need for attention ANd social stimulation AND shopping behavior (which is a talent).

    The reason it’s the case is that both require lower self regulation. The difference is that jewish capacity to work on verbal and conceptual load is feminine – words and experience are cheaper than spaces and times. vs the black difficulty in that the same.

    Every group has adapted to it’s needs. within those needs the group usually excels by some means. The problem is mixing groups without homogenizing manneres, ethics, morals, traditions, values, and group strategy. For example, spend some time around religious black people and they’re wonderful.

    Reply addressees: @NuSecretShopper


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-08 19:49:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799529299520741376

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799390807604015238

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @chlamraypist @MoisheTheFried THERE ARE DIMENSIONS TO SEX DIF

    RT @curtdoolittle: @chlamraypist @MoisheTheFried THERE ARE DIMENSIONS TO SEX DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT…. AND HERE THEY ARE:

    -…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-08 19:36:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799525890579144789

  • THERE ARE DIMENSIONS TO SEX DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT…. AND HERE TH

    THERE ARE DIMENSIONS TO SEX DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT…. AND HERE THEY ARE:

    –“Q: CURT: Is it possible to produce a male, who is cognitively feminine, who demonstrates spectrum behaviors of Compartmentalization, Social Anxiety, ADHD and OCD?”–

    Answer: of course, we find females with autism spectrum disorder who otherwise demonstrate some variation on the other sex differences. We find males with solipsism and psychosis who otherwise demonstrate some variation on the other sex differences.

    WHY?
    Bias in the brain: structural, procedural, valuative, reproductive, regulatory – then the consequences:

    1. BIASES
    (a) Structural
    i. Hemispheric bias: Female prey, right hemisphere bias vs Male, predator, left hemisphere bias.
    ii. Neurological organization: male more compartmentalized (less, faster. decidability, action), female integrated (more, slower, experiential, preference)

    (b) Procedural
    i. Temporal Bias: Female lateral in time, vs Male Longitudinal over time.
    ii. Measurement Bias: Female empathizing in time vs male systematizing over time
    iii: Measurement System Bias: Female verbal, pictorial, empathic bias vs male operational, spatial, systemic bias.
    iv. Goal Bias: Female search for consumption as status vs male search for capital as status.
    v. Risk Bias: Female evasion of risk vs male utility of risk.
    iv. Responsibility Bias: Female irresponsibility (consumption bias + risk) for commons vs male responsibility for commons (capitalization bias + risk).

    (c) Valuative
    i. Valence, or emotional significance processing of the brain.

    (d) Reproductive
    i. Attraction (sexual orientation) Male traits vs female traits.

    (e) Regulatory
    i. Capacity (agency) to regulate impulse: female emotional impulse and flight response, vs male physical impulse and dominance response.

    And at least in general terms, they develop largely in that order unless something goes wrong in utero.

    2. CONSEQUENCES:
    (a) Distribution All people vary on all a, b, c, d, and e axes of development, with sex stereotypes consistent at some level but biases varying somewhat in the extreme. So we can have effeminate males and masculine females but oddly enough, except at the extremes, we can still identify the sex of the individual
    by watching the processing in the brain.

    (b) Variation in Sex Bias in Organization: Male compartmental autism (insufficient integration) vs female integrated psychosis (insufficient compartmentalization) can occur while maintaining structural, valuative, and reproductive normalcy but the consequence is a decline in regulatory ability and therefore agency.

    (c) Extreme (broken) variations can occur in a, b, c, d, or e, without the same variation occuring in the other systems.
    For example, one we’re quite aware of, is that sexual development is somewhat fragile, so sexual attraction can vary while preserving all other developmental biases.

    So to answer the original question, an individual can be both autistic and cognitively, and valuatively feminine without being reproductively feminine.

    Affections
    CD

    Reply addressees: @chlamraypist @MoisheTheFried


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-08 19:36:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799525872778551296

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799492455722578128

  • RT @MarioNawfal: 🚨🇺🇸DR. VAN MOL: GENDER DYSPHORIA IS A DIAGNOSIS, TRANSGENDERISM

    RT @MarioNawfal: 🚨🇺🇸DR. VAN MOL: GENDER DYSPHORIA IS A DIAGNOSIS, TRANSGENDERISM AN IDEOLOGY

    Dr. Andre Van Mol of @ACPeds, Co-chair of the…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-08 05:10:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799307999754035609

  • The entirety of the left (and the cognitively feminine) is to avoid self regulat

    The entirety of the left (and the cognitively feminine) is to avoid self regulation, adaptation, and responsibility. So, it’s obvious: They want control and authority to impose it. It’s not that they hate the police etc, it’s that they hate the obstacle to their power to end the suppression of their irresponsibility.
    Whenever a leftist (or woman) says anything that doesn’t make sense to you, then simply look for what self regulation, adaptation, risk, responsibility accountability they’re seeking to avoid.
    We teach this as as a science including the sex differences in deception and fraud and warfare.

    Reply addressees: @NuSecretShopper @whatifalthist


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-08 00:47:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799241738986422273

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799227168641138758