I should just say: “A response that is stereotypic of the female cognitive bias and combined with limited intelligence.”
And FWIW:
1) I have no interest in causing a revolution. My purpose is to overcome the false belief that revolt and revolution can’t occur, precisely so that we solve the problems of the age so that it DOESN’T occur. (Which I’ve been chanting consistently for a decade). The fact that you don’t know or understand this is representative of your frame of reference not mine or our organizations.
2) I’ve been following you because I see potential, and I”m trying to understand your reasoning because some of your criticisms of men are true, on the remote chance your energies can be positively directed if whatever is off in your reasoning or intuition is corrected. We have collected extraordinary people in our organization. And while I doubt you have the intellectual capacity to understand or make use of the technical aspects of my work, it doesn’t mean you have no potential value to me, us, the informational commons if we could educate you a bit – largely in neuroscience and cognitive science.
3) Categorically, I’m a genius by every known measure. And such name calling is rather humorous.
Reply addressees: @spaceangelvoice
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-11 02:33:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811227386564014080
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811215983408742485