RT @curtdoolittle: Intelligence just refers to cognitive innovation and adaptation per moment of stimulation in time. Human’s evolved to ma…
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-21 23:45:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1363635868431482883
Then that is the highest level of resolution you are capable of expressing confidence in without self doubt and therefore it is the optimum solution for you.
The less power you have the more useful is christianity.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-21 23:37:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1363634022069530626
Reply addressees: @globoHGplex
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1363633002358726658
Given the distribution of Predator(male) and Prey(female) cognitive biases both in individuals and collectively in the population it is illogical to demand universal religion or atheism, and instead we must either separate or produce a narrative of mindfluness that is not false. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1363631060458823685
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-21 23:29:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1363631877169504268
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1363631060458823685
RELIGIOSITY is a by product of the necessity of both predator and prey, whether solitary or social, to overestimate agency in phenemenon so as to not be victim of it when it exists. Ergo prey response should (and does) increase religiosity, and religion does produce mindfulness.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-21 23:25:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1363631060458823685
EXPLAINING THE CONFUSION OF THE CONSERVATIVE MIND
Conservative males mistake their intertemporal predictive modeling as a need for woo-woo. If you need woo-woo it means that which you are contemplating is beyond your present knowledge. It’s the instinct to patrol the borders of your territory to gain the info to model it.
The problem you face is that the territory isn’t physically accessible, and the model requires knowledge of the population, economics, politics, and abstract information.
So the Left’s Feminine mind can’t do intertemporal prediction and they just manufacture falsehoods. But the Right Mascluine mind manufactures demand for falsehoods too.
The difference is that the left’s short term falsehood is continuously actionable using gossip and information distortion but yours requires you act on information but that the available information that is being distorted by the left – and you lack a means of defeating that.
I try to provide you with P-law which is will allow you to model the world by seeing through or past the distortion, allowing to to correct the distortion, and allowing you together to organize because you see past that distortion.
Because you are all searching for woo woo to organize against and it’s all failing. Becaues you’re just as bad as the left at searching for falsehoods. For the simple reason that developing a model of the world at this scale is very difficult. And P-Logic solves that problem.
Unfortunately while P-law exists, you want feels not realz just like the left wants feelz not realz. So you double down on your various woo woos that you can feel, instead of learning the ‘science’ that would provide you with a model of the world free of woo woo: P-law.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-21 18:17:50 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105770612857874079
IS TRUTH THE RESULT OF “FEELZ”? (NO). (Part 1)
The neurology says it’s because of the absence of feels. Given the absence of intuition all that remains is consistency correspondence and possibility. Females need intuition for children. Some of us maintain the feminine. Some of us are free of it. Rule(M) > Govern(MF) > Obey(F)
Well, that’s an implication that there is not one most parsimonious, consistent, correspondent, and actionable paradigm for producing decidability. But there is. I’m trying to eliminate the left’s method of lying. The problem is, that eliminates everyone’s method of lying.
The fact that it’s cognitively masculine is merely a fact. The fact that alternatives appear to be cognitively feminine is merely a fact. Those are the two directions of cognitive bias the brain can and does evolve.
So if we want to say we need narratives that assist the range of human beings across the cognitive spectrum in coordinating their actions then that is fine. As long as they aren’t false. And as long as they don’t persist the Abrahamic method of deception. Which is ‘the problem’.
So just as we need heroic ethics(empathy), rule ethics (reason), and outcome ethics(knowledge), we need Mythology(empathy), Philosophy(reason), and Science(Evidence), because we are children, adults, and aged. And all three must be coherent and scale up and down gracefully w/ us.
Yes but reality is a costly data and algorithm set, given the distribution of age, and ability. We must provide wisdom lit for the young to old, and dim to wise. So the problem I see is that while I might state the first causes, they are too precise a tool for imprecise minds.
Twitter and FB are sketchpads that assist in understanding how to simplify complex ideas so that they are within reach of the better of the common folk.
( … more … )
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-21 18:14:01 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105770597810412831
On the other hand we cannot take the simple mind of man, and his unorganized instincts and make him a fully human agent without a pedagogical sequence. Of narrative, to general rule, to specific prescription.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-21 17:26:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1363540711304486915
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13 @ThruTheHayes
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1363540410073817091
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Imperius__13 @ThruTheHayes It is this possibility of disambiguation which allows commensurability between the three sensory paradigms., Its this commensurability and disambiguation and deflation that the mystic and the sophist hates, because it eliminates loading framing and suggestion (manipulation).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1363540410073817091
Praxis = suggestion (dishonesty), Pedagogy = training (honesty). I agree that it is necessary to have a suite. I’m just saying that they have to be consistent in group strategy.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-21 17:12:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1363537202223980547
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13 @ThruTheHayes
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1363536404991668235
The fact that it’s cognitively masculine is merely a fact. The fact that alternatives appear to be cognitively feminine is merely a fact. Those are the two directions of cognitive bias the brain can and does evolve.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-21 15:45:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1363515100406173699
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1363514841059713031
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Imperius__13 Well, that’s an implication that there is not one most parsimonious, consistent, correspondent, and actionable paradigm for producing decidability. But there is. I’m trying to eliminate the left’s method of lying. The problem is, that eliminates everyone’s method of lying.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1363514841059713031
The neurology says it’s because of the absence of feels. Given the absence of intuition all that remains is consistency correspondence and possibility. Females need intuition for children. Some of us maintain the feminine. Some of us are free of it. Rule(M) > Govern(MF) > Obey(F)
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-21 14:59:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1363503614988349441
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1363499958721216513