Curt Doolittle

Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • MB vs BIG5 … Again.

    MB vs BIG5 … Again.

    MB expanded to a similar number of questions as B5 would remain useful – for the workplace. B5 including empathy-systematizing would explain the difference in facets (subtraits) which vary by sex. So no it’s not bullshit. it teaches normal folk to think about motivations. I worked on this question, and the delta between Big Five and MB is trivial. And it’s due to the low number of MB questions(stability of results) & B5 includes neuroticism vs MB includes empathy-systematizing. MB is about all the normal folks can use in a business setting. So No.  

  • MB vs BIG5 … Again.

    MB vs BIG5 … Again.

    MB expanded to a similar number of questions as B5 would remain useful – for the workplace. B5 including empathy-systematizing would explain the difference in facets (subtraits) which vary by sex. So no it’s not bullshit. it teaches normal folk to think about motivations. I worked on this question, and the delta between Big Five and MB is trivial. And it’s due to the low number of MB questions(stability of results) & B5 includes neuroticism vs MB includes empathy-systematizing. MB is about all the normal folks can use in a business setting. So No.  

  • Less “School” more “church”, social, economic, and military participation.

    Young men are desperate for sex, to obtain it by team membership and competitive advantage, and to limit the duress in the pursuit of all. The only solution is to start earlier: developing socialization, craftsmanship skills, life skills, physical fitness – vs ‘school'(daycare).

  • Less “School” more “church”, social, economic, and military participation.

    Young men are desperate for sex, to obtain it by team membership and competitive advantage, and to limit the duress in the pursuit of all. The only solution is to start earlier: developing socialization, craftsmanship skills, life skills, physical fitness – vs ‘school'(daycare).

  • The Cause of Diversity Frictions

      Woke is a desperate attempt to preserve the pseudoscientific anti-Darwinian movement. IQ, Sex, Class, Race differences are all true. BUT, due to delta in underclass size and resulting culture – and a problem of CLASS, kin-preference, culture, immigration, integration – not race. Sex value of Race(neoteny) will exist. Kin bias will exist. Power-seeking by kin bias will exist. But differences in political demand by kin preference are due to differences in size of classes. ie; only groups w/ same class sizes, same culture, reduce kin friction. This isn’t an ‘opinion’ or a ‘preference’ or an ‘ambition’. it’s a law of evolutionary biology, a law of nature, and it will never, ever change. If we discuss race differences we are discussing conflicts due to kin preference under different genetic distributions.

  • The Cause of Diversity Frictions

      Woke is a desperate attempt to preserve the pseudoscientific anti-Darwinian movement. IQ, Sex, Class, Race differences are all true. BUT, due to delta in underclass size and resulting culture – and a problem of CLASS, kin-preference, culture, immigration, integration – not race. Sex value of Race(neoteny) will exist. Kin bias will exist. Power-seeking by kin bias will exist. But differences in political demand by kin preference are due to differences in size of classes. ie; only groups w/ same class sizes, same culture, reduce kin friction. This isn’t an ‘opinion’ or a ‘preference’ or an ‘ambition’. it’s a law of evolutionary biology, a law of nature, and it will never, ever change. If we discuss race differences we are discussing conflicts due to kin preference under different genetic distributions.

  • The Hard Problem Was But Isn’t Any Longer. 😉

      Sorry, but the ‘hard problem’ of consciousness is solved. It’s taken me a year and a half to figure out how to explain it but once you understand it, like many things, it’s not a hard problem at all – it’s rather simple and obvious. (Philosophers look like idiots in retrospect.) Funny, but computational irreducibility (the inability to provide a mathematical description for some phenomena), isn’t any different from the impossibility of introspection. However, once you know the function (operations) you can describe all of human experience. We can’t talk about consciousness – aritifical or not – without agreement on terms:

    Sensation(nerves/neurons), “Regulation(root)”, Modeling-Prediction, Intelligence(capacity), Awareness (Sentience), Qualia, Consciousness, Reason, Calculation, Computation.

  • The Hard Problem Was But Isn’t Any Longer. 😉

      Sorry, but the ‘hard problem’ of consciousness is solved. It’s taken me a year and a half to figure out how to explain it but once you understand it, like many things, it’s not a hard problem at all – it’s rather simple and obvious. (Philosophers look like idiots in retrospect.) Funny, but computational irreducibility (the inability to provide a mathematical description for some phenomena), isn’t any different from the impossibility of introspection. However, once you know the function (operations) you can describe all of human experience. We can’t talk about consciousness – aritifical or not – without agreement on terms:

    Sensation(nerves/neurons), “Regulation(root)”, Modeling-Prediction, Intelligence(capacity), Awareness (Sentience), Qualia, Consciousness, Reason, Calculation, Computation.

  • No. Proximity Causes Justifiable Racial Conflcit

    -“Segregation causes racism.”-Bret Weinstein @BretWeinstein

    BRETT: FALSE Proximity causes conflict. That’s the science. Why? a) ingroup preference (kin selection) b) the advantage of ingroup preference (cooperative discounts) c) large differences in the genetic distribution of ability between groups (class sizes) d) resulting divergence in manners, ethics, morals, norms e) resulting competition between imposition of behavioral costs. f) resulting resistance to outgroup parasitism. g) resulting parasites justify parasitism h) organizers of parasitism benefit from developing clientele (leftism) i) and those who resist parasites organize in response (rightism). j) parasitism is an objective ascertainment of the imposition of costs upon the private and common. k) instead, segregation causes internalization of costs – forcing ingroups to pay the cost of their own domestication, organization, production, and reproduction. l) desegregation, and forced school integration have been the greatest failures in political history.

  • No. Proximity Causes Justifiable Racial Conflcit

    -“Segregation causes racism.”-Bret Weinstein @BretWeinstein

    BRETT: FALSE Proximity causes conflict. That’s the science. Why? a) ingroup preference (kin selection) b) the advantage of ingroup preference (cooperative discounts) c) large differences in the genetic distribution of ability between groups (class sizes) d) resulting divergence in manners, ethics, morals, norms e) resulting competition between imposition of behavioral costs. f) resulting resistance to outgroup parasitism. g) resulting parasites justify parasitism h) organizers of parasitism benefit from developing clientele (leftism) i) and those who resist parasites organize in response (rightism). j) parasitism is an objective ascertainment of the imposition of costs upon the private and common. k) instead, segregation causes internalization of costs – forcing ingroups to pay the cost of their own domestication, organization, production, and reproduction. l) desegregation, and forced school integration have been the greatest failures in political history.