Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

Given our genetics, their expression , especially as variations on sex differences in cognition, justification negotiation and deceit, combined with our self selection and self sortition by all of the above reinforcing all of the above, then why would you presume that the purpose of any given debate was to persuade another party react counter to all of the above rather than to educate one another on their positions in an effort to determine whether habitation in the same polity is either desirable or possible.

Masculine inter temporal capitalizing and feminine temporal consumption are polar opposites. Ego the only solution is separation.

I would only seek to educate others in alternatives because persuasion is impossible especially when amplified by the territorial demand for individual responsibility vs the urban impossibility of it leaving only extra political trade viable.

You could try to debate me on these matters but the science. Nd the incentives are incontestable.

Reply addressees: @MattDoyleSmit @russianbotulism @LittleMammith