Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • Just to improve on this a bit: The family and community tend to be biased in fav

    Just to improve on this a bit: The family and community tend to be biased in favor of the feminine and the society and the polity tend to be biased in favor of the masculine – because these are the domains of our reproductive interests, emotional, and cognitive competencies.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-21 15:34:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1462444393969995780

    Reply addressees: @Daemon_Knight40 @cathsophi @fukiffyknow

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1462443561803300864

  • PUA: Compete, Personal Activism (=) MRA: Resist, Political Activism (-) MGTOW: A

    PUA: Compete, Personal Activism (=)
    MRA: Resist, Political Activism (-)
    MGTOW: Avoid, Social Activism (+)
    INCEL: Complain (0)

    (It’s another triangular relationship that mirrors the political triangle.)


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-20 22:49:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1462191519687917577

    Reply addressees: @fukiffyknow @cathsophi

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1462185374755786757

  • • Masking • Burnout • Bridge Burning • Few Friends/Prefer Males/Prefer Adults/Pr

    • Masking
    • Burnout
    • Bridge Burning
    • Few Friends/Prefer Males/Prefer Adults/Prefer 1 on 1 Time
    • Special Interests
    • Overshare


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-20 14:52:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1462071321488236553

  • Anthropologists are notorious for economic and political incompetence. Monogamy

    Anthropologists are notorious for economic and political incompetence. Monogamy exists in order to control female hyperconsumption and sedition (what you’re doing); to prevent female reproduction from imposing costs on others; retain land, and to control male violence;


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-20 03:38:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1461901625136717830

    Reply addressees: @theipaper @WhoresofYore

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1461645391464701952

  • more … So who is at fault? The women for their evolutionary instincts? The jew

    … more …

    So who is at fault? The women for their evolutionary instincts? The jews for breeding to institutionalize them as a group strategy? or the men who put up with thise behavior from both women and jews without restoring truth, duty, reciprocity, markets, and order?

    What do I think: The right consists of mommy’s boys who bitch like little girls but don’t show and if they do show are as self centered and egotistic as little girls, if they have to sacrifice their petty fantasies for the good of all.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-19 22:40:04 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107306130128122284

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107306129505236532


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    ARE THE JEWS TO BLAME OR ARE WE? We have enough science to explain jews as cognitively female demonstrating the same production-evasion, responsibility evasion, neuroticism, magical thinking, mental instability, lying-denying, social construction, and hyperaggression as females in moral panic, especially if they are perceived as undesirable (rejected). Jews are the world’s only feminine intellectuals. Europeans are the most masculine intellectuals. Yet we are also the most open society because of our trifunctionalism, it’s tolerance, and the overtolerance of utopian Christianity and French humanism. There is no difference between the intellectual ability of northern European (at least English) intelligentsia and the Jewish – look at the historical record. The difference is that jews organized to maximize the reproduction of those traits, and with the end of our aristocracy we stopped. This isn’t a thing we can convince the jews to change any more than it is a thing we can convince our women to change. We can only outlaw the anti-social behavior of women and jews as thoroughly as we have outlawed the anti-social behavior of men, and then invest in teaching mindfulness and responsibility to dampen female and Jewish instincts. And we can do that fairly easily now that we understand it – and understand it clearly and scientifically. It’s a developmental defect that within limits has an evolutionary advantage to females who must have higher neuroticism and empathy, and responsibility evasion in order to carry the cognitive load of multiple children, resource availability to care for them, using men to obtain resources, defense, and most importantly control over their own reproduction with the men they choose. while competing for survival against women equally as socially predatory, engaged in hen-pecking for female dominance, and using social construction, falsehoods and deceits gossiping and destruction to destroy competing females – something which only men will prevent by imposing limits on the females with force. Every Jewish dysfunctional behavior is due to jews selecting for those behaviors and inbreeding to exacerbate them. Why? The female mind tracks many small things, and can work hard and long with many small things; is social and verbal not mechanical; negotiates agreement not truth, and is predisposed to seduction, false promise, evasion, loading, framing, suggestion, obscurantism, denial, and deceit – because it is the cheap means of managing children and competing for resources in social competition. Once you understand jews are just disloyal, hyper consumptive, hyper-aggressive females hiding behind false pretense of innocence, using religion and a history of persecution they justly deserved, then you will also understand WE ARE LETTING THEM GET AWAY WITH IT. And we are letting them convert our women and our invasive underclasses to a hostile new version of the Jewish religion: woke. … more…

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107306129505236532

  • ARE THE JEWS TO BLAME OR ARE WE? We have enough science to explain jews as cogni

    ARE THE JEWS TO BLAME OR ARE WE?

    We have enough science to explain jews as cognitively female demonstrating the same production-evasion, responsibility evasion, neuroticism, magical thinking, mental instability, lying-denying, social construction, and hyperaggression as females in moral panic, especially if they are perceived as undesirable (rejected).

    Jews are the world’s only feminine intellectuals. Europeans are the most masculine intellectuals. Yet we are also the most open society because of our trifunctionalism, it’s tolerance, and the overtolerance of utopian Christianity and French humanism.

    There is no difference between the intellectual ability of northern European (at least English) intelligentsia and the Jewish – look at the historical record. The difference is that jews organized to maximize the reproduction of those traits, and with the end of our aristocracy we stopped.

    This isn’t a thing we can convince the jews to change any more than it is a thing we can convince our women to change.

    We can only outlaw the anti-social behavior of women and jews as thoroughly as we have outlawed the anti-social behavior of men, and then invest in teaching mindfulness and responsibility to dampen female and Jewish instincts.

    And we can do that fairly easily now that we understand it – and understand it clearly and scientifically.

    It’s a developmental defect that within limits has an evolutionary advantage to females who must have higher neuroticism and empathy, and responsibility evasion in order to carry the cognitive load of multiple children, resource availability to care for them, using men to obtain resources, defense, and most importantly control over their own reproduction with the men they choose. while competing for survival against women equally as socially predatory, engaged in hen-pecking for female dominance, and using social construction, falsehoods and deceits gossiping and destruction to destroy competing females – something which only men will prevent by imposing limits on the females with force.

    Every Jewish dysfunctional behavior is due to jews selecting for those behaviors and inbreeding to exacerbate them. Why? The female mind tracks many small things, and can work hard and long with many small things; is social and verbal not mechanical; negotiates agreement not truth, and is predisposed to seduction, false promise, evasion, loading, framing, suggestion, obscurantism, denial, and deceit – because it is the cheap means of managing children and competing for resources in social competition.

    Once you understand jews are just disloyal, hyper consumptive, hyper-aggressive females hiding behind false pretense of innocence, using religion and a history of persecution they justly deserved, then you will also understand WE ARE LETTING THEM GET AWAY WITH IT. And we are letting them convert our women and our invasive underclasses to a hostile new version of the Jewish religion: woke.

    … more…


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-19 22:39:55 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107306129505236532

  • @RadioFreeNorthwest We have enough science to explain jews as cognitively female

    @RadioFreeNorthwest We have enough science to explain jews as cognitively female demonstrating the same neuroticism magical thinking, and hyperaggression as females in moral panic, especially if they are percieved as undesirable (rejected).

    Jews are the world’s only femeinine intellectuals. Europeans are the most masculine intellectuals. Yet we are also the most open society because of our trifunctionalism, it’s tolerance, and the overtolerance of utopian christianity and french humanism.

    There is no difference between the northern european (at least english) intelligentsia and the jewish – look at the historical record. The difference is that they organized to maximize the reproduction of those traits, and with the end of our aristocracy we stopped.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-19 22:28:06 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107306083023022891

  • I am unsure what that Social Darwinism means, because I interpret it as abandoni

    I am unsure what that Social Darwinism means, because I interpret it as abandoning people rather than caring for them at the cost of limiting their reproduction. Preserving natural selection doesn’t obviate us from reciprocity within proportionality.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-19 21:32:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1461809617353252865

    Reply addressees: @nequalita @IturbeltzE

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1461807056873267210

  • This is why “women should be believed” was such a hysterically humorous claim. P

    This is why “women should be believed” was such a hysterically humorous claim. Precisely because we know that women engage in self-delusion in order to fabricate social construction of falsehoods in order to evade responsibility for female lack of self-reguation.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-19 20:02:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1461786985996115970

    Reply addressees: @Observer800 @washingtonpost

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1461785691692716039

  • Not credibly accused. Both men and women coddle women but we know that women are

    Not credibly accused. Both men and women coddle women but we know that women are subject to extreme rates of social construction of deceit, by magical thinking, revisionism, false accusation, and pervasive lying. I mean, that’s where leftist ‘social constructionism’ comes from.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-19 20:01:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1461786684257968132

    Reply addressees: @Observer800 @washingtonpost

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1461785691692716039