@newfierefugee FIrst that’s a childish response. Second, that’s only vaguley meaningful in the sense that the ovum defaults to the female, because the male is a ‘super female’. Third, we start out with potential, and are variations in x and y ‘bait’ (grow) us into a distribution of male to female traits. Hence not infrequent african women with clitorises that are full penises, and east asians that are nearly absent sexual dimorphism.
THE MAJORITY-FEMALE INABILITY TO ADAPT TO EVOLUTIONARY CIVILIZATION
Sovereignty, Markets for Polities, Federation, Loyalty, reconciliation, truth before face, duty before self(responsibility) are all interdependent requirements for maximum adaptive velocity. Note that these are all opposites of female instinct, intuition, and behavior.
Europeanism is costly.
Females can’t practice loyalty necessary for a distributed federation because they can’t practice reconciliation. Again, this equilibrium is interesting since women seek to keep the peace at all costs. While they never forgive or forget.
Females are incompatible with evolution and political civilization as they are necessasry for familial and social cohesion.
I’m had thought I was done with group differences in evolutinoary velocity and therefore and empirical and qualitative superiority, but the integration of women as the force opposing civilization turned out to be far worse than I’d anticipated.
Females can’t practice loyalty necessary for a distributed federation because they can’t practice reconciliation. Again, this equilibrium is interesting since women seek to keep the peace at all costs. While they never forgive or forget.
Female Reproductive Strategy > Female Intuition > Female anti-social-behavior > Female warfare > Abrahamic Religions > Unwarrantable false promise of freedom from laws of nature(males, europeans) by social construction using pilpul, critique, undue praise, occult->pseudoscience.
@RadioFreeNorthwest It’s very simple science. First: Neoteny. Domestication Syndrome. Extended development. The primary direction of human evolution has been neoteny: retention of childhood traits – meaning the slowing of sexual maturity – in exchange for lowering aggression, and increasing self regulation, because of longer slower cognitive deelopment.
Simple causality. The neural tube develops and the stem cells that drive growth migrate into the body from there. More migration more maturity. Less migration less maturity.
Second: Sexual Dimorphism. More male bias (hardy) more female bias (petite), more dimorphism (very different sexes). Africans least neotenous and masculine bias (disease gradient). South Eurasians a little more. Northwest weurasians (europeans) more so, and east asians much more so.
So east asians low sexual dimorphism and high neoteny because of it, but longer lives. Northern europeans less neoteny but high sexual dimorphism. shorter lives. Africans shortest lives. All other subraces are relatively preodictable obvious cross breeds of these four primary ‘species’ (races).
Human hyper adaptivity applies to human sexual hyper adaptivity and hyper promiscuity. As such despite for ‘species’ of man we hybridize fairly easily under duress or in the lower classes, and infrequently in the upper classes for economic and political reasons.
(Screenshots below from the presentation on the book)
We are all subject to sortition. You’re making general observation from within your own sorting criteria, which is a selection bias, you can’t avoid. My job involves predicting macro movements and unfortunately the data is with me as usual.
@DanSWright @phl43 No. Classicals were wrong because cooperative networks dont equilibrate as predicted, they exhaust and overextend because the cost of reorganization isn’t something they’ll pay until they have to – b/c humans in organizations maximize rents.
