I can explain relatively easily with time, but quickly the correct understanding is that with consciousness came the need for mindfulness to prevent crashing our neural economies. So there are a whole range of methods for providing mindfulness. Not all are false as is abrahamism.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-01 01:02:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488316886144237571
Reply addressees: @_Akhaten
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488314439199772673
Oh? “In my home, at my desk, seated in my chair, with both hands typing on my laptop in fr0nt of me, I reach to the right of the laptop, grasp the coffee cup by the handle, lift it, sip from it, and replace the cup, and return my hands to the keyboard.”
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-31 20:39:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488250633505411083
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488250086341685254
And Male(systematizing)Speed and female (empathizing)Mass are the max axis of evolutionary discovery because sex was the broadest innovation in evolutionary discovery until cognition evolved hyper-adaptivity. But we are still bound by M/F cognition: time-population div of labor.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-31 19:51:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488238515054051328
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488237638033289225
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Imperius__13 So all people, all organizations, all institutions, all civilizations tend to seek neural economy and monopoly of one of the three-axis – usually religion(lower IQ-ME) or state(higher IQ-china), and only Europeans chose law first, preserving competition between the Male/Female.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1488237638033289225
In other words, a competency spectrum from child, to mother, to ascendant male, to established male – decision hierarchy given age, ability, knoweldge, experience, AND empathy(near) vs systematizing (far). We need religion(empathy) > philosophy(choice) > law(decidability) for it.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-31 19:44:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488236831573487621
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488236312905801737
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Imperius__13 Because the value of DECIDABILITY(true, false) is to select the optimum from CHOICE(good, bad). That’s really the answer. It’s not complicated. Division of male, neutral, female behavior by time and population. IOW verbal persuasion(promise) to evidentiary incentives (evidence).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1488236312905801737
Because contrary to over a century of female, jewish, pseudoscientific psychology, it turns out that the evolutionary advantage is disagreeableness not agreeableness. Social bias is merely primate leftover. Same reason most sociopaths cooperate just fine.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-31 19:40:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488235798134763522
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488234827283419140
Well, that’s again, the difference between normie search for understanding, meaning, and association vs autistic search for falsification of a theory by peers. Which are two of the three points on the cognitive distribution (empathy-submission) being the left most.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-31 19:33:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488233922429394947
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488233216133804033
Emotional feels <- Psychological Balance -> Empirical Intellect
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-31 19:15:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488229572898443271
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488229035935211520
@RadioFreeNorthwest “The Enemy’s Primary Weapon is Female Seduction, Baiting Us Into Hazard, with thefalse promise of non aggression, when the female means of warfare, is undermining and the incrementa destruction of institutions of the cultural production of loyalty, duty, truth, responsibiity, and sovereignty.”
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-31 19:14:39 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107718671027714796
Well again, you’re definitely germanic (psychological) and I’m definitely anglo (empirical) and others are definitely empathic (emotional) so the problem is what combination of law, institutions, and religion produce coherence across that spectrum?
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-31 19:12:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488228726882119685
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488228215386689542
Psychological differences, caused by genetics, that need satisfaction across a spectrum from the Empathic to Ideal to Empirical. I think the Germans had it right. There is nothing in xianity that can’t be put in law really. So a martial, heroic, tradition, of unity vs aesthetics.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-31 19:11:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488228418181287940
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1488227563356966916