Do you know how hard it is to condense the science of human behavior into a formula in ordinary language and fit it within a tweet? lol
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-06 15:32:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1578045418721710080
Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science
-
Ideology = Power Philosophy = Justification Political Strategy = Justification o
Ideology = Power
Philosophy = Justification
Political Strategy = Justification of Group Strategy
Group Strategy = historical geographic and demographic necessity
The Science of Human behavior = evolutionary computation by sovereignty, reciprocity, markets at the cost of selection
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-06 15:30:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1578045001162006532
Reply addressees: @SammySc44817825 @Gidikim
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1578018383039078406
-
“National IQs can almost be perfectly predicted (r=.9) from polygenic scores (ED
–“National IQs can almost be perfectly predicted (r=.9) from polygenic scores (EDU3)”–
OK. Are we there yet? IQ matters. It’s pretty much ALL that matters at national scale. AND the races differ in IQ by the size of the underclasses. AND classes are the result of genetic load.
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-06 00:39:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1577820718133305344
-
RT @LukeWeinhagen: Three root strategies of human interaction: 1. Violence 2. Av
RT @LukeWeinhagen: Three root strategies of human interaction:
1. Violence
2. Avoidance
3. Cooperation
Every strategy not falling into o…
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-05 22:54:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1577794332475752451
-
RT @NoahRevoy: Most people cant hold a conversion anymore
RT @NoahRevoy: Most people cant hold a conversion anymore.
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-05 22:54:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1577794308077412353
-
Interesting: on the topic of the next james bond. The upper middle and middle cl
Interesting: on the topic of the next james bond. The upper middle and middle class production of sufficiently ‘dangerous’ men, has been eradicated by the market (&woke) demand for non-threatening agreeableness, absent any sense of superiority. So casting bond is near impossible
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-05 22:24:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1577786942061674504
-
RK(all) GrrM’s ‘innovation’ in the traditional fantasy epic is to create many ov
RK(all) GrrM’s ‘innovation’ in the traditional fantasy epic is to create many overlapping character arcs that show all of us are vulnerable to incentives. And unfortunately that the adolescent and naive are the heroes that win in the end (the meek shall inherit the earth). False.
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-05 20:41:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1577760793503977473
Reply addressees: @razibkhan
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1577146168597172224
-
The reality is that it’s not possible to educate women into reciprocal behavior.
The reality is that it’s not possible to educate women into reciprocal behavior. Instead, like children they have to be indoctrinated and socialized into good behavior. As such they’re being socialized into the consequence of their behavior. Feminism is in its death throws.
4/4
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-05 20:05:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1577751854246674432
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1577751852732629012
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
So what the manosphere has demonstrated over that time (I guess about 15 to 20 years) is that (a) yes women’s wants are hyper-consumptive-gamic (b) endless, as is their penchant for unhappiness (c) and they assumed ‘more’ wouldn’t end up in market equilibration by men.
3/nOriginal post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1577751852732629012
-
So what the manosphere has demonstrated over that time (I guess about 15 to 20 y
So what the manosphere has demonstrated over that time (I guess about 15 to 20 years) is that (a) yes women’s wants are hyper-consumptive-gamic (b) endless, as is their penchant for unhappiness (c) and they assumed ‘more’ wouldn’t end up in market equilibration by men.
3/n
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-05 20:05:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1577751852732629012
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1577751850916495365
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
I’d find relationships, etc fulfilling. But I’d never crack the top 10% of influencers. Yet the ideas were still valuable at the time: women create a market for affection, but their hyperconsumption-gamy meant that they assumed all increases would be gains, not equilibrated.
2/nOriginal post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1577751850916495365
-
I’d find relationships, etc fulfilling. But I’d never crack the top 10% of influ
I’d find relationships, etc fulfilling. But I’d never crack the top 10% of influencers. Yet the ideas were still valuable at the time: women create a market for affection, but their hyperconsumption-gamy meant that they assumed all increases would be gains, not equilibrated.
2/n
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-05 20:05:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1577751850916495365
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1577751849414934552
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
I don’t remember what year I registered ‘a market for affection dot com’. At that point I was trying to decide where to put my efforts. Economics was dead in 2008. Relationships, fashion, and art were interesting. But politics and law were necessary.
1/nOriginal post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1577751849414934552