Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

Rudyard: Why would you presume, that given the left originates in feminine cognition, and that feminine cognition is not consistent, that left argument would be consistent? It isn’t. It’s all primitive moral intuition. So the consistency is simply the counter-reaction of the left’s demand for irresponsibility regardless of causality. This is why the left can (a) manufacture falsehoods in industrial volume (b) use rolling accusation, meaning-abuse (conflation and inflation), and various forms of GSRRM without a consistent logic other than the reducibility of all left positions to the evasion of responsibility whether of self regulation, display word or deed.
-hugs

Reply addressees: @whatifalthist

Because of sex differences in cognition consisting of feminine empathizing vs masculine systematizing, sex differences in ‘overthinking’ fail the feminine and advantage the masculine for rather obvious reasons of the consistency of existence vs the inconsistency of mind and behavior. We discuss the differences in mathematical, programmatic, and verbal reducibility but we fail to grasp the same applies to the feminine empathic-verbal-pictoral versus the masculine systematic-existential-model. Prediction depends upon systemization of the systematically reducible. Ergo empathizing doesn’t scale.

(cc: @ItIsHoeMath, @uberboyo)