Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

Well, just FYI, the IQ curve for the spectrum is the inverse of the normal distr

Well, just FYI, the IQ curve for the spectrum is the inverse of the normal distribution. Ergo there are as many of eight of us at the high end as neurotypicals. Autism either works, or doesn’t.

But yea, it’s a superpower – sorta.
Every human variation comes with a trade off.

Source date (UTC): 2022-10-09 20:09:18 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1579202365252833280

Reply addressees: @SilentMan1510 @fairhair_harold @nrken19

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1579200104170680320

October 9, 2022
Yes. The only true superpower we know of. 😉 But, yes, also, there are side effe

Yes. The only true superpower we know of. 😉

But, yes, also, there are side effects of this superpower: like, the incomprehensibility of, and to, neurotypicals. 😉

Source date (UTC): 2022-10-09 19:59:28 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1579199891435565056

Reply addressees: @SilentMan1510 @fairhair_harold @nrken19

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1579198377866465280

October 9, 2022
RT @NoahRevoy: Letting yourself go after marriage because “now you have to accep

RT @NoahRevoy: Letting yourself go after marriage because “now you have to accept me just the way I am” is marriage fraud.

Source date (UTC): 2022-10-09 18:14:33 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1579173484688986113

October 9, 2022
And just to balance the scale, now that we know liberalism is just the female bi

And just to balance the scale, now that we know liberalism is just the female bias to evade personal responsibility for self and other emotional regulation, meaning that they’re ‘children’, liberals are forgivable. Conservatives aren’t. We don’t have that burden. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1579129522804310017

Source date (UTC): 2022-10-09 15:21:59 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1579130060124344326

https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1579129522804310017

October 9, 2022
The strongest negative reinforcement one can deliver is ignoring. Once you’ve id

The strongest negative reinforcement one can deliver is ignoring. Once you’ve identified an intellectually dishonest person, you’re just feeding his antisocial behavior with attention. Ergo, the virtue of blocking.

Source date (UTC): 2022-10-09 01:25:35 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1578919569867288576

Reply addressees: @d4n_m4d3r1a @MagixPunx @FlvxSurfing

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1578918429205356544

October 9, 2022
(Note that behaviorally speaking he’s cognitively female, or at least infantiliz

(Note that behaviorally speaking he’s cognitively female, or at least infantilized, and throwing a tantrum, because he can’t get his way. That’s all that’s going on. )

Source date (UTC): 2022-10-09 00:17:42 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1578902486714580992

Reply addressees: @FlvxSurfing @MagixPunx @d4n_m4d3r1a

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1578901797103882241

October 9, 2022
The only thing you’ve ‘got’ on me, at all, is that soft eugenics, continuing nat

The only thing you’ve ‘got’ on me, at all, is that soft eugenics, continuing natural selection, in order to defend humanity against the laws of nature’s evolution, is the hard problem we have to accept and contend with. Even that – well, I’m right. Sorry. I don’t make the rules. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1578889663716425728

Source date (UTC): 2022-10-08 23:28:20 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1578890064230174720

https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1578889663716425728

October 8, 2022
No, you interpreted the male bias of explaining all behavior as normal distribut

No, you interpreted the male bias of explaining all behavior as normal distributions using the female bias of interpreting all behavior as uniform distributions. We call this the NAXALT/AXALT fallacy common to all female cognition, and the common means of identifying sex in text.

Source date (UTC): 2022-10-08 17:56:05 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1578806451942092800

Reply addressees: @MagixPunx @d4n_m4d3r1a

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1578805745172512769

October 8, 2022
I’m sure you think there is some logic to what you’re saying. But whatever it is

I’m sure you think there is some logic to what you’re saying. But whatever it is, is predicated on some logic I’m not saying, but you’re imagining.

Yes, there are only three axes of human variation: sex, neoteny, and genetic load. Most of us are admixtures of sex diferences.

Source date (UTC): 2022-10-08 17:54:33 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1578806063662440449

Reply addressees: @MagixPunx

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1578805103338741761

October 8, 2022
That’s unfortunately incorrect. The left (female evasion of responsibility for p

That’s unfortunately incorrect. The left (female evasion of responsibility for private and commons ) and right (male responsibilty for private and commons) are polar opposite intuitions and political preferences when it comes to the primary demand of european civ: responsibility

Source date (UTC): 2022-10-08 17:37:55 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1578801877864845314

Reply addressees: @MagixPunx

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1578771331713159168

October 8, 2022