I might argue that it’s easier to enjoy women once you understand them, and accept them as they are.
This works inversely for women. It’s easier to enjoy men once understand them and accept them as they are.
Why? We divide the perception of the universe by time F:now vs M:then.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-14 15:25:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1592176816634359812
Reply addressees: @NoahRevoy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1592141228875079681
CORRECTION:
There is no such thing as too smart.
There is such a thing, as immoral and amoral.
And worse, such a thing as the feminine intuition’s natural immorality, and method of warfare by social construction, undermining, canceling, & sedition.
And Jewish strategy is female.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-14 15:16:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1592174594181726208
Reply addressees: @BlackSwanSupply @Howard_Lovy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587176377471614979
TODAY’S LESSON
There is a vast difference in ability to reconcile post-conflict between the responsible and dutiful whether right or wrong, and the immoral and evil regardless of right or wrong.
Never turn a political conflict into a moral question.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-14 15:13:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1592173919267594242
This is my job. Social media is the cheapest method of conducting social science experiments ever made possible by man, becuase it’s demonstrated rather than reported behavior; the mask of anonymity amplifies willingness to demonstrate behavior, and some people ‘engage’ in depth.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-14 11:10:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1592112764428095489
Reply addressees: @botasaurous @GuyStatue @kittypurrzog @MaxBoot
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1592111028745437185
So here is the interesting question I’m trying to answer: we know that logical consistency degrades to emotional consistency rather quickly as IQ declines,and it’s amplified by empathizing (vs systematizing). We know it’s rapid. So is a majority informed electorate ever possible?
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-14 11:01:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1592110376732295170
Reply addressees: @botasaurous @GuyStatue @kittypurrzog @MaxBoot
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1592108385809625091
I am exploring your incentive for choosing to countersignal (moral offense) a truth stated uncomfortably instead of countersignaling a lie-deny by ridicule. Even more so, how hard is it to cause you to recognize the cause of your behavior?
I know the first, second, not third.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-14 10:50:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1592107621250904065
Reply addressees: @botasaurous @GuyStatue @kittypurrzog @MaxBoot
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1592106282382954498
Yes, but why are you motivated to state that observation versus a different observation – the opposite. (I know the answer, but do you).
BTW: I retweet for my audience that follows – becuase they ask.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-14 10:41:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1592105546332897288
Reply addressees: @botasaurous @GuyStatue @kittypurrzog @MaxBoot
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1592104230802051072
… (j) so why are you offended at inequality, claims of,demonstration of, inequality, when inequality is manifest in sexual, social, economic, intellectual, political markets of competition via demonstrated behavior? Why are you offended at the behavioral equivalent of gravity?
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-14 10:38:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1592104723179794434
Reply addressees: @botasaurous @GuyStatue @kittypurrzog @MaxBoot
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1592101426096140291
And to facilitate that failure of feminism and feminization that degraded the polity, business, and economy by entry of women in to economy, business, and polity we’re going to eliminate common property, child support, and alimony to restore families in a two-step marriage market
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-14 00:33:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1591952434770968582
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1591947067513262081
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
The reason you can’t reliably develop a relationship with, or marry single mothers, is that you can never enter the exchange of putting one another – and your relationship – first. Although if both you have children, that possibility increases. Single mom authoritarianism blocks.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1591947067513262081
And the consequence is that men & women will continue to have starter marriages w/w children, and adult marriages for family life, for the simple reason that feminism and feminization have led to infantilization that cannot be overcome without the hardship of adapting to reality.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-14 00:31:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1591951992909430787
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1591947067513262081
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
The reason you can’t reliably develop a relationship with, or marry single mothers, is that you can never enter the exchange of putting one another – and your relationship – first. Although if both you have children, that possibility increases. Single mom authoritarianism blocks.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1591947067513262081