Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • See. It worked for you. The people it worked for were fine. But the people it di

    See. It worked for you. The people it worked for were fine. But the people it didn’t….


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-27 17:17:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1872693310239981790

    Reply addressees: @_goldswine

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1872659293436252300

  • Q: “What is the name for the psychological behavior of believing one has special

    –Q: “What is the name for the psychological behavior of believing one has special knowledge whether divine or otherwise?”–

    Answer
    The psychological behavior you are describing is often referred to as gnosticism in a more philosophical or religious context, or specifically in psychology, it might be linked to what is known as delusions of grandeur or megalomania.

    1) Gnosticism historically refers to a diverse set of religious beliefs emphasizing personal spiritual knowledge (gnosis) over orthodox teachings. In a modern psychological context, this can sometimes manifest as a belief in having special, often divine, knowledge.
    2) Delusions of grandeur, a type of delusion, involve believing that one possesses exceptional abilities, wealth, or fame. When this belief extends to thinking one has special, divine, or secret knowledge, it can be part of this delusional spectrum.
    3) Megalomania is an older term that describes a psychological state where someone has an obsessive need for power, accompanied by delusions of grandeur, which might include the belief in possessing unique or divine insights.

    These terms might not perfectly encapsulate the behavior you’re describing, but they are closely related concepts in psychology and philosophy that address the belief in having unique or special knowledge.

    THE SPECTRUM OF GRANDIOSITY DISORDERS
    If a person exhibits grandiosity but does not show further dissociation from reality (i.e., does not have delusions or other psychotic symptoms), the most likely diagnosis within the psychological framework would be:

    1) Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD):
    Key Features:
    – A grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements).
    – Preoccupation with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love.
    – Belief in being “special” and unique, and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions).
    – Requires excessive admiration.
    – Sense of entitlement.
    – Interpersonally exploitative behavior.
    – Lack of empathy.
    – Envious of others or believes others are envious of them.
    – Arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes.

    – Distinction from Psychosis: In NPD, the grandiosity is a part of the personality structure rather than a break from reality. These individuals might believe in their own superiority but do not typically experience the severe perceptual distortions, delusions, or hallucinations characteristic of psychotic disorders.

    2) Histrionic Personality Disorder might also be considered if the grandiosity is accompanied by excessive attention-seeking behaviors, but the focus on grandiosity is more central to NPD.

    3) Bipolar Disorder could be in the differential diagnosis, particularly if the grandiosity is episodic and not a consistent trait. However, without other bipolar symptoms like mood swings, increased energy, or changes in sleep patterns, NPD would be more fitting.

    4) Antisocial Personality Disorder might coexist with grandiosity, but the focus here would be more on a pervasive pattern of disregard for and violation of the rights of others, with grandiosity as one of several traits.

    In diagnosing, clinicians would look for a pervasive pattern of grandiosity in thought and behavior, alongside other criteria from the DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition) for NPD, ensuring that these traits are not better explained by another mental disorder or due to substance use or another medical condition.

    It’s also important to note that personality traits exist on a spectrum, and not everyone with grandiose traits will meet the full criteria for a personality disorder. They might simply have narcissistic traits without the disorder.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-27 02:10:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1872464955322277888

  • THE SPECTRUM OF GRANDIOSITY DISORDERS If a person exhibits grandiosity but does

    THE SPECTRUM OF GRANDIOSITY DISORDERS
    If a person exhibits grandiosity but does not show further dissociation from reality (i.e., does not have delusions or other psychotic symptoms), the most likely diagnosis within the psychological framework would be:

    1) Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD):
    Key Features:
    – A grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements).
    – Preoccupation with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love.
    – Belief in being “special” and unique, and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions).
    – Requires excessive admiration.
    – Sense of entitlement.
    – Interpersonally exploitative behavior.
    – Lack of empathy.
    – Envious of others or believes others are envious of them.
    – Arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes.

    – Distinction from Psychosis: In NPD, the grandiosity is a part of the personality structure rather than a break from reality. These individuals might believe in their own superiority but do not typically experience the severe perceptual distortions, delusions, or hallucinations characteristic of psychotic disorders.

    2) Histrionic Personality Disorder might also be considered if the grandiosity is accompanied by excessive attention-seeking behaviors, but the focus on grandiosity is more central to NPD.

    3) Bipolar Disorder could be in the differential diagnosis, particularly if the grandiosity is episodic and not a consistent trait. However, without other bipolar symptoms like mood swings, increased energy, or changes in sleep patterns, NPD would be more fitting.

    4) Antisocial Personality Disorder might coexist with grandiosity, but the focus here would be more on a pervasive pattern of disregard for and violation of the rights of others, with grandiosity as one of several traits.

    In diagnosing, clinicians would look for a pervasive pattern of grandiosity in thought and behavior, alongside other criteria from the DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition) for NPD, ensuring that these traits are not better explained by another mental disorder or due to substance use or another medical condition.

    It’s also important to note that personality traits exist on a spectrum, and not everyone with grandiose traits will meet the full criteria for a personality disorder. They might simply have narcissistic traits without the disorder.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-27 02:10:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1872464144173305856

  • You are using your statement to cope. It’s what he’s doing. It’s what many of us

    You are using your statement to cope.
    It’s what he’s doing. It’s what many of us do. It’s what I did in my career. He’s just eminently better at it than the rest of us.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-26 04:09:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1872132618369773935

    Reply addressees: @GroypSoldier69

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1872125480411033915

  • This is meaningless. It’s a universal answer by grouping everyone into a standar

    This is meaningless. It’s a universal answer by grouping everyone into a standard deviation. In my experience all online IQ tests add at least an SD to demonstrated intelligence. Interestingly it requires almost exactly that phrasing and will not respond with a more accurate…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-26 02:41:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1872110551289196825

    Reply addressees: @future__ruins @CarpeMortem13 @ItIsHoeMath

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1872095845086277653

  • Not quite true Diane. First, women do not select eugenically the select for domi

    Not quite true Diane.
    First, women do not select eugenically the select for dominance expression, resource access, and emotional stimulation. Those are negative values with short term interest but long term liability.
    Second, it’s that a vastly disproportionate number of women rate themselves by criteria far above their sexual market value, and rate men far below their sexual market value.
    In other words female magical thinking and hypergamy when subject to the paradox of choice, lack market feedback mechanisms by which to adjust their appraisements. Most men and women are 4s to 6s with the primary difference being the faster and shallower maturation of women, and slower and deeper maturation of men, leading to offsets in peak sexual market value that often exceed the four year preference margin.
    So women are selecting for the short term because men have created a world where women can demonstrate that luxury. Whereas under the agrarian and hunter gatherer eras women had no such luxury – it wasn’t possible.
    The sexes always equilibrate. You can’t selectively pick out evolutionary contrivances without discovering how they are mirrored in the opposite of the other sex.
    The difference is short term female consumption, at minimum responsibility and lowest ris vs long term masculine capitalization at maximum responsibility and risk. Every sex difference is reducible to that first principle.

    Reply addressees: @RealDianeYap


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-25 20:51:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1872022273802334208

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1871708688454730199

  • One comment in two points: 1) while male antisocial behavior may be more visible

    One comment in two points: 1) while male antisocial behavior may be more visible than female antisocial behavior, both express proportionally. 2) Conversely, female mental illness is more visible than male and (much) more common: around 40%. So I’m not sure what metrics you’re…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-24 21:48:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1871674331098734812

    Reply addressees: @datepsych

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1871623103752945757

  • Correct. Though a couple of things I would remind you of. (a) I have never sough

    Correct. Though a couple of things I would remind you of.
    (a) I have never sought to inform the common man, only learn the thinking of the common man – it’s biases, limits, and failures.
    (b) I have always assumed that others will make use of my work to address groups ‘downriver’.…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-22 22:21:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1870957796453486687

    Reply addressees: @RichardArion1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1870952111124406693

  • Correct. Though a couple of things I would remind you of. (a) I have never sough

    Correct. Though a couple of things I would remind you of.
    (a) I have never sought to inform the common man, only learn the thinking of the common man – it’s biases, limits, and failures.
    (b) I have always assumed that others will make use of my work to address groups ‘downriver’. For example, look at @Exquofonte’s video today on religion. It’s better than I would have done.
    (c) it’s a filter that sorts people out, making my life easier.
    (d) if you can understand it you likely won’t get it wrong which I can’t say for more accessible prose.
    (e) there is a relationship between my prose and operational language that is a natural evolution such that anyone developing the skill will converge on it – see @LukeWeinhagen’s even more exemplary prose.
    (f) historically your criticism doesn’t hold up. We live in a world constructed by thinkers who were and remain all but impenetrable to the common man – who merely consumes ‘dumbed down’ versions of those ideas such that he doesn’t even know the origin.
    So you are correct, but as far as I know my work is not useful for common folk, but for intellectuals and activists who must influence common folk in many different narratives and frames.
    But again, you’re correct and thank you for trying to help. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-22 22:21:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1870957796226895872

  • RT @SteveStuWill: “Tough math teachers get lower ratings from students, because

    RT @SteveStuWill: “Tough math teachers get lower ratings from students, because students like them less. However, students get better grade…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-22 21:29:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1870944774188048414