14. All:
In closing: My work has convinced me that none of us have agency over our moral intuitions without gradually bearing increasing responsibility under competitive pressure. So I see the female/feminine/jewish ‘conspiracy of common interest’ as instinctual. (blameless)
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-06 15:16:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611381158150914048
Reply addressees: @ConceptualJames
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611202996326600704
11. So James is (a) studying the literature of seduction, coercion, deception, while maintaining the disposition that people choose ideologies, rather than ideologies choose them. (b) evading the third rail of outing the Feminine/Ashkenazi conspiracy of common feminine interest.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-06 15:05:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611378533904924679
Reply addressees: @ConceptualJames
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611202996326600704
8. And given that there are many more christians than Jews, and given female dominance in verbal acuity expressing experience, and given that there are nearly 2 vs 1 outliers in verbal acuity above 140 among Ashkenazi, we see those numbers in academic, media, political, bias.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-06 14:57:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611376408302948352
Reply addressees: @ConceptualJames
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611202996326600704
7. Just as a minority of women will defect to masculine systematizing and moral demand for responsibility for self and commons. And many women will do so once they have three or more children, and grasp the cost of ‘undisciplined commons behavior’ on the regulation of children.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-06 14:55:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611375949127290881
Reply addressees: @ConceptualJames
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611202996326600704
6. But the masculine (systematizing) vs feminine (empathizing) distribution of traits is overlapping in the population distribution – meaning some empathic, Christian, disadvantaged, or irresponsible men will defect to the feminine empathizing moral coalitions.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-06 14:54:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611375579302854657
Reply addressees: @ConceptualJames
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611202996326600704
Example that the majority of women are incapable of reason (vs justification), and empiricism (vs wishful thinking), because prediction of emotion (empathizing) never matures into prediction of outcomes (systematizing), thereby conflating agency and responsibility as oppression.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-06 14:09:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611364444050984963
Reply addressees: @GeorgeWallaces4 @shivaunt71 @AnnLesbyPhD
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611356581500944384
I have considered that quite by accident, to explain human cognition and behavior, I’ve had to master nearly every scientific discipline, including aesthetics, so that I can with painful precision measure and decide(judge) every expression of human behavior as behavioral economy.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-06 13:30:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611354445069025283
Reply addressees: @20bux @pmarca
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611343530584162305
Quite the opposite. I’ve had to master nearly every discipline in order to articulate with clarity the economics of human behavior at all scales, as well as the genetic, biological, developmental, familial, cultural, and civilizational causes of those behaviors.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-06 13:26:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611353606803914753
Reply addressees: @shivaunt71 @AnnLesbyPhD
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611352393517760513
And this feminine evasion of responsibility for bearing the cost of interpersonal stress in order to maintain ‘whiteness’ and its benefits, is the cause of infantilization, rampant degeneracy, the political confict of this era, the world rebellion against democratic liberalism
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-06 13:07:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611348823670161410
Reply addressees: @AnnLesbyPhD
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611238804118978560
There is no ‘white privilege’. There is a sterotype (accurate statistical probability) that ‘whites’ will practice ‘whiteness’, and demonstrate maximum responsibility, demand for it as reciprocity.
White sterotype of Whiteness is EARNED every single day. At high cost by millions.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-06 12:56:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611345844485214209
Reply addressees: @AnnLesbyPhD
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611238804118978560