@Babygravy9 You are correct. Well done. Attached are the foundations.
Female Cognition > female behavior > abrahamism as a strategy > marxism as a reformation > feminism as an explicit articulation.
More available if you can use it.
Cheers
CD
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-01 00:25:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1874250524033445888
You are correct. Well done. Attached are the foundations.
Female Cognition > female behavior > abrahamism as a strategy > marxism as a reformation > feminism as an explicit articulation.
More available if you can use it.
Cheers
CD https://t.co/f4NqarmtG8
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-01 00:25:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1874250524117393522
Reply addressees: @Babygravy9
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1862843426544214182
Joseph
I know at least these studies exist. I’m sure you can find them with Perplexity.
100 for basic geometry.
115-120 for basic calculus
138(140) for advanced math.
At least those three studies exist.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-31 23:42:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1874239716012548344
Reply addressees: @BronskiJoseph
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1874158908958523736
This isn’t far off really. Well done. Though I’m not sure about 150+.
100 is correct for basic geometry.
115-120 for basic calculus
138(140) for advanced math.
At least those three studies exist.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-31 23:41:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1874239392069673062
Reply addressees: @teejlifting @BronskiJoseph
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1874191148744663279
RT @LukeWeinhagen: Compatibility, not Equality
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-31 18:17:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1874157911834059046
kind of fond of that quote because the science says the empathizing vs systematizing spectrum is the origin of differences.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-30 17:06:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873777722306289839
Reply addressees: @BigSisterCynthi
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873770847925891522
RT @JayMan471: BMI/obesity/fatness is inversely correlated with IQ and even more inversely correlated with class (primarily among women). P…
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-30 13:21:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873720997482012934
RT @StatisticUrban: The numbers aren’t fully in yet, but it’s looking likely that the world, as a whole, fell below the population replacem…
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-30 13:19:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873720626747482281
no. Because human consciousness is an evolution of the need to organize the body for movement in space, and therefore both goal, prediction, and organization. That’s all it is. There is no evidence of anything other than mechanical determinism given pressure, spin, vibration, frequency, quanta, and combinatorics. None. All else is just deterministic consequence of the exhaustion of pressure by either expansion into space or concentration into mass, and dissolution into energy (entropy). You would need some evidence of agency. There is none. And any such evidence would invalidate all science by ending deterministic behavior (laws).
Reply addressees: @njalbertini
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-30 02:02:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873550197072252928
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873549374103625843
That has no bearing on the claim of agency prediction action or god.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-30 01:58:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873549217224180166
Reply addressees: @njalbertini
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873548996192469281