Exactly. (Flawless.)
Brains predict.
What they predict differs.
Predicting emotions tailors reality to emotions.
Predicting reality tailors emotions to reality.
Cmpathizing(verbal) vs systematizing (physical)
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-20 20:22:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616531656868855820
Reply addressees: @Turbo_Flux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616530943031787520
You are making a common natural mistake of not starting with first principles (causes) and then constructing a behavior from first principles, thereby assuming the cause of some behavior.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-20 18:47:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616507779333902341
Reply addressees: @normiecore @ImATennisBall @zagrebbi @RukhsanaSukhan @nathancofnas
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616507352550674451
Well, that’s a very different question because it’s circumventing selection by definition, right? How does female intuition vary from male? How does female cognition vary from male? How does female sexuality vary from male? Rather simple answer.
Women feel unsafe and infantilize.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-20 18:46:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616507405474598912
Reply addressees: @normiecore @ImATennisBall @zagrebbi @RukhsanaSukhan @nathancofnas
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616505179938951174
ERGO: IMO academic compartmentalization is the origin of this problem when combined with postwar war against darwin-spencer and the Darwinian explanation for group differences in performance, and censorship of anything to do with sex-to-race differences in anything at all.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-20 18:42:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616506590667935746
Reply addressees: @normiecore @ImATennisBall @zagrebbi @RukhsanaSukhan @nathancofnas
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616501147979886598
IMO: @TooEdit KMac (and he can correct me here) softly implied the genetic component was significant. In my work I start with original genetic variation, emphasize adaptation to strategy, explain that strategy alone is enough, but that outliers (agrarian selection) are possible.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-20 18:41:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616506187221966848
Reply addressees: @normiecore @ImATennisBall @zagrebbi @RukhsanaSukhan @nathancofnas
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616501147979886598
JUST FYI: the original conflict is a variation on the nature vs nurture debate. (a) are group differences genetically constructed (natural), or culturally constructed (nurture) or both, and by what ratio? And does selection within a group favor group strategy, resulting in shift?
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-20 18:38:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616505526644314128
Reply addressees: @normiecore @ImATennisBall @zagrebbi @RukhsanaSukhan @nathancofnas
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616501147979886598
Does ANY sex, class, ethnicity, civilization (or race for that matter, since race and civilization have coalesced) not demonstrate variation in strategy (and all it entails)?
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-20 18:35:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616504637334618113
Reply addressees: @normiecore @ImATennisBall @zagrebbi @RukhsanaSukhan @nathancofnas
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616501147979886598
That’s convenient, but we can’t indoctrinate people into what they don’t want to believe. So what is it that makes people succeptible to jewish pseudsocience and sophistry but less so to white pseudoscience and sophistry. And why does it spread so thoroughly?
We own blame too.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-20 18:11:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616498640066908162
Reply addressees: @john45273745
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616497959407063041
The math is pretty simple: all advances in energy conversion (consumption) must be offset not by Malthusian reproduction (dysgenia) but by soft eugenic limits on reproduction, thereby continuing natural selection.
4/4
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-20 16:04:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616466822471225344
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616466820898213891
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
So is Carlyleism right? Aesthetically, Culturally, and institutionally he’s correct. But his economics isn’t – he was amidst a storm of change. And we can’t blame him for it, because while he was visionary, he was a bit early, and lacked our present understanding.
3/4
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1616466820898213891
All political differences are reducible to sex differences in perception, cognition, prediction, valuation, advocacy, labor, and responsibility. And while sex is binary, intuition and behavior are overlapping distributions.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-19 18:32:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616141465272320024