I love women. All of you. Even the crazy ones. You make life worth living.
Just that war, law, economics, and politics, and operating machinery? Well, we neanderthals sorta got that covered. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-06 21:10:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632851279562039298
Reply addressees: @ladyinabag1 @ScottAdamsSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632849467954036739
–“Women want to be desired, and men want to be needed.’–
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-06 20:37:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632842957165297665
Not disagreeing with that. Disagreeing that we have sufficiently defending against female anti-social, anti-economic, anti-political, and frankly anti-civilizational behavior. Sexes demonstrate them differnetly. Women are seditious, seductive, selfish, hyperconsumptive, hypergamic, at the expense of everything. They are not the ‘good people’ we anticipated just the less THREATENING of the sexes. Civilizing both sexes is necessary and we have let pandora’s worst features into the political system. Between women’s voting for policy that incentivizes irresponsibility, voting for taxes, we have consumed all the gains of women’s contribution to the economy in taxation. Add the collapse of marriage, the poverty creating of the single parent household, and the collapse of necessary reproduction to maintain intergenerational redistribution, and adding women has been about as bad as the plague if not worse.
Do I like it? No. But it didn’t take long for magical thinking to bring us to the point of demographic failure and the economic consequences for all of us.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-06 18:33:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632811662762754049
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632808419982712833
Not disagreeing with that. Disagreeing that we have sufficiently defending against female anti-social, anti-economic, anti-political, and frankly anti-civilizational behavior. Sexes demonstrate them differnetly. Women are seditious, seductive, selfish, hyperconsumptive, hypergamic, at the expense of everything. They are not the ‘good people’ we anticipated just the less THREATENING of the sexes. Civilizing both sexes is necessary and we have let pandora’s worst features into the political system. Between women’s voting for policy that incentivizes irresponsibility, voting for taxes, we have consumed all the gains of women’s contribution to the economy in taxation. Add the collapse of marriage, the poverty creating of the single parent household, and the collapse of necessary reproduction to maintain intergenerational redistribution, and adding women has been about as bad as the plague if not worse.
Do I like it? No. But it didn’t take long for magical thinking to bring us to the point of demographic failure and the economic consequences for all of us.
Reply addressees: @zacharyaustin11 @Merry_in_NC @ScottAdamsSays
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-06 18:33:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632811662641184776
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632808419982712833
You don’t want to know because it’s true and will cause you personal crisis like it did the rest of us. 😉
List any female(or feminine) bias and it’s easily reducible to evasion of responsibility for the commons.
We have made female intuition virtuious because it was evolved for self and children. But like all other sex differences in cognition female(feminine) cognition (empathizing in time, verbal, pictoral) doesn’t scale.
This is the cause of our present conflict.
We added women to the franchise without limiting female anti-social, anti-economic, and anti-political behavior as thoroughly as we had male. (which in retrospect is an obvvious failure). However criticisms of women’s thinking during the era of women’s sufferage has played out rather quickly with the predicted destructive results.
The question is, how do we fix this so that we preserve the universal franchise? It’s rather challenging.
Reply addressees: @Merry_in_NC @ScottAdamsSays
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-06 17:51:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632801200847331328
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632797358005055492
You don’t want to know because it’s true and will cause you personal crisis like it did the rest of us. 😉
List any female(or feminine) bias and it’s easily reducible to evasion of responsibility for the commons.
We have made female intuition virtuious because it was evolved for self and children. But like all other sex differences in cognition female(feminine) cognition (empathizing in time, verbal, pictoral) doesn’t scale.
This is the cause of our present conflict.
We added women to the franchise without limiting female anti-social, anti-economic, and anti-political behavior as thoroughly as we had male. (which in retrospect is an obvvious failure). However criticisms of women’s thinking during the era of women’s sufferage has played out rather quickly with the predicted destructive results.
The question is, how do we fix this so that we preserve the universal franchise? It’s rather challenging.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-06 17:51:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632801200939704321
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632797358005055492
SCOTT: (Deep)
Causality:
– Feminine (left) magical thinking and storytelling
vs
– Masculine (right) hyperbola and testifying.
Why?
– Female, Feminine, Prey, Empathizing, in Time, evading responsibility, hyperconsuming. (children)
vs
– Male, masculine, predatory, systematizing, over time, seeking responsibility, hypcapitalizing. (polity)
YOU CAN”T MORALIZE THIS ARGUMENT
the history of wetsern civ is the history of male SYSTEMATIC argument. The left is not masculine. They are feminine.
Mother seduce and sedate by storytelling to overload the mind of children, and change their state.
Men debate by testimony, where they risk harm by overloading lying and denying.
YOU CAN’T FIX THIS.
Reply addressees: @ScottAdamsSays
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-06 17:40:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632798389510217729
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632367277894139910
SCOTT: (Deep)
Causality:
– Feminine (left) magical thinking and storytelling
vs
– Masculine (right) hyperbola and testifying.
Why?
– Female, Feminine, Prey, Empathizing, in Time, evading responsibility, hyperconsuming. (children)
vs
– Male, masculine, predatory, systematizing, over time, seeking responsibility, hypcapitalizing. (polity)
YOU CAN”T MORALIZE THIS ARGUMENT
the history of wetsern civ is the history of male SYSTEMATIC argument. The left is not masculine. They are feminine.
Mother seduce and sedate by storytelling to overload the mind of children, and change their state.
Men debate by testimony, where they risk harm by overloading lying and denying.
YOU CAN’T FIX THIS.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-06 17:40:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632798389631942658
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632367277894139910
All:
The four primary races vary in neotenic evolution.
Neoteny will select for intelligence and agency in exchange for sexual maturity and agreession.
Might be somehow be effect of increase in meat consumption creating increase in size then decrease by neotenic evolution. Looks like it.
Proximity will select for non-aggression,and so neoteny.
Cold and planning, will select for intelligence.
Meaning isolation + size + neoteny + ‘close living’ is necessary for increase in intelligence.
The difference between the races then is largely the size of the underclass that carries non-neotenic as well as genetic load – which is largely visible to the naked eye.
This fits the genetic history we have found, and keep increasing the dataset for, every year now.
Reply addressees: @Steve_Sailer @PostAp0calyptik @DialecticBio
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 03:45:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632225891697717248
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631829168110596096
All:
The four primary races vary in neotenic evolution.
Neoteny will select for intelligence and agency in exchange for sexual maturity and agreession.
Might be somehow be effect of increase in meat consumption creating increase in size then decrease by neotenic evolution. Looks like it.
Proximity will select for non-aggression,and so neoteny.
Cold and planning, will select for intelligence.
Meaning isolation + size + neoteny + ‘close living’ is necessary for increase in intelligence.
The difference between the races then is largely the size of the underclass that carries non-neotenic as well as genetic load – which is largely visible to the naked eye.
This fits the genetic history we have found, and keep increasing the dataset for, every year now.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 03:45:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632225891815239680
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631829168110596096