Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • Moroccan avg IQ is typical for Middle easterners at 84, which is pretty bad in g

    Moroccan avg IQ is typical for Middle easterners at 84, which is pretty bad in general. It means half of the population is effectively unemployable in the west. The other MENA countries listed are those with high performing classes. So I suspect it’s just who immigrated to the USA. In the case of Morocco, it’s from the lower classes. And in the rest, it’s from the middle or higher classes.

    Reply addressees: @eranAbamie


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 23:16:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634332539958571009

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634331344929947652

  • Moroccan avg IQ is typical for Middle easterners at 84, which is pretty bad in g

    Moroccan avg IQ is typical for Middle easterners at 84, which is pretty bad in general. It means half of the population is effectively unemployable in the west. The other MENA countries listed are those with high performing classes. So I suspect it’s just who immigrated to the USA. In the case of Morocco, it’s from the lower classes. And in the rest, it’s from the middle or higher classes.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 23:16:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634332540042346506

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634331344929947652

  • THE TIPPING POINT IN MALE COGNITION (repost) (exasperation) I love my fellow mas

    THE TIPPING POINT IN MALE COGNITION
    (repost) (exasperation)

    I love my fellow masculine males, I love the common man, despite not being one, and I love that Gab exists to give them voice – when that voice is so thoroughly suppressed elsewhere.

    On the other hand I’ve become absolutely convinced, despite every possible attempt to find a solution, that the …

    Mascluline > Disagreeable > Anti-Social > Sociopathic

    .. spectrum is no more open to education and organization into a political force than is the extreme left that this right-wing mirrors in behavior.

    It’s actually worse because the left extremes will at least follow direction despite all the risks and costs, and the right won’t show up without certainty that they have to bear neither cost nor risk – the right are natural cowards.

    So there is no hope for the hard right. The middle or center-right will have to lead. Because disagreeable, antisocial, and sociopathic magical thinking (conspiracy) mad-boys are a dead weight on themselves, and a cancer for the broader conservative and traditional population.

    So realistically, I write for the tiny percent for whom there is hope to provide insight, education, and strategy. And I pretty much ignore the rest unless there is some reason for conducting an argument that might educate the truth-seeking audience despite the cacophony of idiocy spammed by the dysfunctionals.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 22:44:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634324485745639425

  • THE TIPPING POINT IN MALE COGNITION (repost) (exasperation) I love my fellow mas

    THE TIPPING POINT IN MALE COGNITION
    (repost) (exasperation)

    I love my fellow masculine males, I love the common man, despite not being one, and I love that Gab exists to give them voice – when that voice is so thoroughly suppressed elsewhere.

    On the other hand I’ve become absolutely convinced, despite every possible attempt to find a solution, that the …

    Mascluline > Disagreeable > Anti-Social > Sociopathic

    .. spectrum is no more open to education and organization into a political force than is the extreme left that this right-wing mirrors in behavior.

    It’s actually worse because the left extremes will at least follow direction despite all the risks and costs, and the right won’t show up without certainty that they have to bear neither cost nor risk – the right are natural cowards.

    So there is no hope for the hard right. The middle or center-right will have to lead. Because disagreeable, antisocial, and sociopathic magical thinking (conspiracy) mad-boys are a dead weight on themselves, and a cancer for the broader conservative and traditional population.

    So realistically, I write for the tiny percent for whom there is hope to provide insight, education, and strategy. And I pretty much ignore the rest unless there is some reason for conducting an argument that might educate the truth-seeking audience despite the cacophony of idiocy spammed by the dysfunctionals.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 22:44:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634324485879873540

  • We don’t see what started it. It appears she’s trying to break contact. It appea

    We don’t see what started it.
    It appears she’s trying to break contact.
    It appears he won’t let her.
    I’d blame him.
    Once separated by a third party she didn’t break contact, but pursued and hit him.
    So, now I’d blame her.

    Notice: the similarity between African and female culture in the unwillingness to break contact, while repeating nonsense. Likewise watch white and black men fight. White more easily withdraw and break contact. Do white men simply not ‘lose it’ so easily?

    In your behavior is basically barking because you’re too fearful to break contact and take the status (self-image) hit.

    Breaking contact makes you vulnerable. We generally won’t break contact until a state of calm is achieved.

    Reply addressees: @StevePender @FightHaven


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 22:17:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634317494780403712

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634264441091923968

  • We don’t see what started it. It appears she’s trying to break contact. It appea

    We don’t see what started it.
    It appears she’s trying to break contact.
    It appears he won’t let her.
    I’d blame him.
    Once separated by a third party she didn’t break contact, but pursued and hit him.
    So, now I’d blame her.

    Notice: the similarity between African and female culture in the unwillingness to break contact, while repeating nonsense. Likewise watch white and black men fight. White more easily withdraw and break contact. Do white men simply not ‘lose it’ so easily?

    In your behavior is basically barking because you’re too fearful to break contact and take the status (self-image) hit.

    Breaking contact makes you vulnerable. We generally won’t break contact until a state of calm is achieved.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 22:17:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634317494885163011

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634264441091923968

  • A POSITIVE MESSAGE FOR WOMEN? –“Almost no one on the right has a positive messa

    A POSITIVE MESSAGE FOR WOMEN?

    –“Almost no one on the right has a positive message for women.”– @FrailSkeleton

    Hmmm. Well, is that true?
    We’re running an experiment.
    One of the most dangerous in history.
    – We have learned that women in their evolutionary roles are priceless. We have learned that women in the economy is a false return on rate of reproduction.
    – We have learned that the inclusion of women into economy and polity, at the cost of reproduction, ends in genetic decline. And our IQ is heading to second-world threshold within the next few years.
    – We have learned that women do not net contribute to the labor pool as much as displace men out of the labor pool (labor participation rates) in those fields that are least damaging to our bodies.
    – We have learned that the totality of the contribution of women to the economy is absorbed by taxation. And because of it we require two income households.
    – We have learned that even by participating in the economy the only net taxpayers are white men over 35, yet 70% of government services are consumed by women. But men are not taken care of by the state as are women and suicide in vast numbers in late middle age.
    – We have learned women in a polity are, as expected, biased to empathizing at interpersonal scale, and naturally incompetent to, and resistant to, systematizing at political scale.
    – We have learned that it destroyed the intersexual cooperation between the sexes, the family as the fist institution of reproductive, social, economic, and political organization.
    – We have learned that nearly everything we were warned about women in politics was true.
    – We have learned that suicide is increasing in both sexes at different ages, that everyone is de-socialized, that society means children, that the production of families is the only thing that makes us relatively equal with equal incentives.
    – We have learned that the consequences are horrific.

    So when you say the right has nothing positive to say about women. What I think you mean is, we have nothing positive to say about women acting as if they are men, and failing at it. And we have plenty of positive things to say about women when they act as women, and succeed at it. So we’d prefer they didn’t fail at being men AND fail at being women too. And instead succeeded at being women. So we can succeed at being men. And together we can succeed as families. And as families produce the next generation as good or better than the last.

    (That’s the quotable bit there at the end.)

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Reply addressees: @FrailSkeleton


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 20:31:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634290827915669505

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634107030699999232

  • A POSITIVE MESSAGE FOR WOMEN? –“Almost no one on the right has a positive messa

    A POSITIVE MESSAGE FOR WOMEN?

    –“Almost no one on the right has a positive message for women.”– @FrailSkeleton

    Hmmm. Well, is that true?
    We’re running an experiment.
    One of the most dangerous in history.
    – We have learned that women in their evolutionary roles are priceless. We have learned that women in the economy is a false return on rate of reproduction.
    – We have learned that the inclusion of women into economy and polity, at the cost of reproduction, ends in genetic decline. And our IQ is heading to second-world threshold within the next few years.
    – We have learned that women do not net contribute to the labor pool as much as displace men out of the labor pool (labor participation rates) in those fields that are least damaging to our bodies.
    – We have learned that the totality of the contribution of women to the economy is absorbed by taxation. And because of it we require two income households.
    – We have learned that even by participating in the economy the only net taxpayers are white men over 35, yet 70% of government services are consumed by women. But men are not taken care of by the state as are women and suicide in vast numbers in late middle age.
    – We have learned women in a polity are, as expected, biased to empathizing at interpersonal scale, and naturally incompetent to, and resistant to, systematizing at political scale.
    – We have learned that it destroyed the intersexual cooperation between the sexes, the family as the fist institution of reproductive, social, economic, and political organization.
    – We have learned that nearly everything we were warned about women in politics was true.
    – We have learned that suicide is increasing in both sexes at different ages, that everyone is de-socialized, that society means children, that the production of families is the only thing that makes us relatively equal with equal incentives.
    – We have learned that the consequences are horrific.

    So when you say the right has nothing positive to say about women. What I think you mean is, we have nothing positive to say about women acting as if they are men, and failing at it. And we have plenty of positive things to say about women when they act as women, and succeed at it. So we’d prefer they didn’t fail at being men AND fail at being women too. And instead succeeded at being women. So we can succeed at being men. And together we can succeed as families. And as families produce the next generation as good or better than the last.

    (That’s the quotable bit there at the end.)

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 20:31:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634290828213469184

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634107030699999232

  • Unfortulately you’re wrong. And we. have a vast corpus of twin studies to prove

    Unfortulately you’re wrong. And we. have a vast corpus of twin studies to prove it.

    Why do people (women in particular) have so much trouble believing it? Well, there are a lot of reasons.

    But mostly there is a sort of obvious evolutionary law necessary for all animal survival at play: your competence or incompetence needs to matter so little that the child will mature, survive and reproduce regardless of your competency.

    So, you can screw up your kids, you can make life harder or easier. But over the course of one’s life – GENES ALWAYS EXPRESS. Why? A child is sharing your prefrontal cortex so to speak. When mature and away from you the child isn’t. Genes always express. Always.

    Just is what it is.
    🙁


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 20:10:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634285729378455571

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634284351981604970

  • Unfortulately you’re wrong. And we. have a vast corpus of twin studies to prove

    Unfortulately you’re wrong. And we. have a vast corpus of twin studies to prove it.

    Why do people (women in particular) have so much trouble believing it? Well, there are a lot of reasons.

    But mostly there is a sort of obvious evolutionary law necessary for all animal survival at play: your competence or incompetence needs to matter so little that the child will mature, survive and reproduce regardless of your competency.

    So, you can screw up your kids, you can make life harder or easier. But over the course of one’s life – GENES ALWAYS EXPRESS. Why? A child is sharing your prefrontal cortex so to speak. When mature and away from you the child isn’t. Genes always express. Always.

    Just is what it is.
    🙁

    Reply addressees: @Barbarian_Brain @AeoliumTweets @datepsych


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 20:10:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634285729231654922

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634284351981604970