Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

That can be taken either way.
If you mean the negative, by your signature conter signaling by sarcasm, then it’s easy to disagree.
They are irresponsible other than for themselves, (and their offspring).
Self > Self and Offspring > Commons > Polity
That’s a hierarchy of responsibility.
Responsibility evasion.
When we speak of the commons and politics, then of course, we are NOT talking about themselves and their children.
And that’s where their personalities exhibit the tendency.
We see this universally in sex differences in behavior. In particular, we see it when comparing task (now) versus intertemporal (then) predictions. We see it in the difference between male and female means of doing mathmatics.
Etc.

That can be taken either way.
If you mean the negative, by your signature conter signaling by sarcasm, then it’s easy to disagree.
They are irresponsible other than for themselves, (and their offspring).
Self > Self and Offspring > Commons > Polity
That’s a hierarchy of responsibility.
Responsibility evasion.
When we speak of the commons and politics, then of course, we are NOT talking about themselves and their children.
And that’s where their personalities exhibit the tendency.
We see this universally in sex differences in behavior. In particular, we see it when comparing task (now) versus intertemporal (then) predictions. We see it in the difference between male and female means of doing mathmatics.
Etc.

Reply addressees: @ConceptualJames

You don’t know that but I’m pretty good at these things and you need about frour years of twice a week professional help. No one takes your position unless they are externalizing an internal problem. Because your position doesn’t correspond to reality, only your imagination of…