FEMALE AND JEWISH METHODS OF THINKING VS MALE AND EUROPEAN
(science, testimony, sovereignty, and reciprocity are male concepts.)
Women are just as aggressive and warlike as men, they just express aggression and war differently from men: by parasitism, special pleading, relativism, undermining, social construction, seduction (baiting into hazard), sedition, treason.
So if we study male and female differences we observe that the Jews conduct warfare as do women. Why? Weakness, empathizing, verbal acuity: devotion, nepotism, seduction (baiting into hazard), double standards, pilpul(sophistry) and critique(undermining), social construction, sedition, and treason.
Why? I wont’ get into this in detail but there are pretty large differences between the races in subtle expression. And ingroup traditions accelerate group selection.
So to some degree (and once you see it you can’t unsee it) the semitic peoples as a trend, jews in general somewhat, and the ashkenazi in particular have either narrowed or reversed cognitive sexual dimorphism.
We can see this in race differences in expression of mental illness and antisocial behavior, as well as means of expression (langauge) means of argument (aggression), occupational selection (talking, ‘shopping’, ‘hazarding’), family organization, political affiliation, and religious or cultural literature (critique).
So, personally I find it fascinating. And professionaly I find it allowed me to solve most of our problems by minor reform to the law, that prohibit female antisocial to warfare behavire, as thoroughly as male antisocial to warfare behavior.
And you know what? That let me understand what’s wrong with the world regardless of sex. Lots of baiting into hazard – everywhere.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
Reply addressees: @superkanga @KiwiBreeder