RT @toodarkmark: Evasion of responsibility.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-21 23:13:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638318052633608199
RT @toodarkmark: Evasion of responsibility.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-21 23:13:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638318052633608199
For example, the rather obvious nature of what I just stated, vs the rather obvious ability to influence people with lower IQ by graphs of a single dimension that mislead them (easily). “Statistics, damned statistics” only applies to people who can’t manage multi-dimensional…
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-21 22:53:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638312924711190531
Reply addressees: @ooooobelix
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638299414505615363
IQ isn’t poorly correlated with income. Instead the correlation decreases as the population under that IQ decreases, and as the utility additional wealth decreases. In other words, making more money is increasingly difficult above the obvious threshold, and the utility of it decreases.
Combined with IQ is a wealth substitute in that there is less value in wealth as IQ increases, becuase consumables decrease in utility, and risk approaches zero for smart people.
Wealth doesn’t corrlate with IQ as much as expected because trait conscientiousness is more important for accumulating wealth across the entire distribution.
More variables but IQ is a great example of the variation of incentives as IQ increases and decreases.
Reply addressees: @ooooobelix
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-21 22:51:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638312299843796992
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638299639731441668
IQ isn’t poorly correlated with income. Instead the correlation decreases as the population under that IQ decreases, and as the utility additional wealth decreases. In other words, making more money is increasingly difficult above the obvious threshold, and the utility of it decreases.
Combined with IQ is a wealth substitute in that there is less value in wealth as IQ increases, becuase consumables decrease in utility, and risk approaches zero for smart people.
Wealth doesn’t corrlate with IQ as much as expected because trait conscientiousness is more important for accumulating wealth across the entire distribution.
More variables but IQ is a great example of the variation of incentives as IQ increases and decreases.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-21 22:51:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638312299973734400
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638299639731441668
YES, LEFTISM (LIBERALISM) IS CAUSED BY MENTAL ILLNESS.
(Or at least failure to provide mindfulness by means that assist in integration rather than justifying non-integration and rejection of one’s market value.)
Again: It’s not so much that liberalism is https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2023/03/how-to-understand-the-well-being-gap-between-liberals-and-conservatives/…
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-21 20:46:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638281007987150875
Sure. Rebellion against the laws of the universe, and blaming their ‘genetic betters’ for their condition as if it’s from intentional oppression, rather than natural selection.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-21 20:40:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638279548377747471
Reply addressees: @ToujoursFidale
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638278263247343616
(Never ceases to amaze me that the emotional, empathizing, neurotic, (and limited), mind, dependent on conformity for confidence in their judgment, can’t imagine that we don’t feel much other than humor or irony. They’re kittens being toyed with using textual string. They can’t… https://twitter.com/GestaltedApe/status/1638258956442411009
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-21 20:29:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638276641918013441
RT @toodarkmark: “Men maintain society. Women maintain life.”
New wave feminism ain’t no joke.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-21 18:00:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638239246774419458
Hmm, we can disambiguate that a bit.
People see extraordinarily accurately – just what the camera sees. In fact, we know how to mislead ‘seeing’ and it’s relatively difficult. We have to construct the means of fooling ‘seeing’ by intent. But seeing (disambiguating) is just the first step in perception. After that we perform auto-association, prediction, and biases in prediction, and wishful thinking to advance biases. So we IMAGINE what we want to. It’s not that we see, hear, and percieve reality differently. It’s that we imagine cause and consequence differently despite seeing reality accurately.
People say the opposite because they don’t want to blame themselves. And correct themselves. That’s all.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-20 23:57:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637966680637726721
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637965509755797504
Hmm, we can disambiguate that a bit.
People see extraordinarily accurately – just what the camera sees. In fact, we know how to mislead ‘seeing’ and it’s relatively difficult. We have to construct the means of fooling ‘seeing’ by intent. But seeing (disambiguating) is just the first step in perception. After that we perform auto-association, prediction, and biases in prediction, and wishful thinking to advance biases. So we IMAGINE what we want to. It’s not that we see, hear, and percieve reality differently. It’s that we imagine cause and consequence differently despite seeing reality accurately.
People say the opposite because they don’t want to blame themselves. And correct themselves. That’s all.
Reply addressees: @Anonforanonym @enigma3078
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-20 23:57:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637966680461590530
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637965509755797504