Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

Great question: Certainly not freudian, in fact we’d be critical of it – There is not scientific basis for it. And I doubt we’d use Alderian either The reason being we are not working with feminine drive for equality, abrahamic, or marxist critique (undermining) or even the problem of mentally unhealthy people. We’re working by biases and incentives. Behavioral economics so to speak. We do not find the feminine model that dominates the field as useful except in the corrective – we are instead we’re looking for the explanatory. If you work in the field and understand our work you would frame issues by causality more than experiential effect. We see this in the online work by Dr. Orion Taraban.
We would probably argue that Jungian is the best model, as it’s compatible with our work. We use first principles of behavior (acquisition), and sex differences in first principles (responsibility), then IQ, the big5/6 traits-facets, Haidt’s moral foundations, and my work on sex differences in cognition, and cultural variation by sex differences in cognition, combined with civ differences in institutional sequence (path dependence).
Not that you really asked for all that. lol 😉

Reply addressees: @curtmorehouse @ThruTheHayes