Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • It’s just that we’re out of excuses now for race differences in intelligence. An

    It’s just that we’re out of excuses now for race differences in intelligence. And this study is clear and large enough with enough safeguards against bias and outcome determinacy, that there just is no point.
    Race isn’t skin deep. For all intents and purposes we were speciating by geography (continent/climate) until the agrarian revolution. But we are hyper-adaptive including sexually hyper-adaptive so despite morphological differences that would cause other species to resist hybridization, humans are less likely to resist hybridization and continue speciation.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 15:53:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640381522854199297

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640376679397834753

  • No, you can’t assume an individual has the average IQ of his or her group. Inste

    No, you can’t assume an individual has the average IQ of his or her group. Instead you can assume that there are more African Americans, MENA, Indians, SE Asians, Hispanics, with lower IQs per capita than Europeans and East Asians. But for example, there are a LOT of Indians (Hindustanis), despite low average Indian IQ, there are still a LOT of high IQ Indians. Likewise, despite high European IQ there are comparatively few Europeans. So you can only assume the probability of a lower vs higher IQ. And you can assume norms, traditions, values, and institutions evolved to satisfy the majority of that population so you can expect cultural differences dependent upon group IQ.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 15:40:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640378141133635586

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640373127795339265

  • No, you can’t assume an individual has the average IQ of his or her group. Inste

    No, you can’t assume an individual has the average IQ of his or her group. Instead you can assume that there are more African Americans, MENA, Indians, SE Asians, Hispanics, with lower IQs per capita than Europeans and East Asians. But for example, there are a LOT of Indians (Hindustanis), despite low average Indian IQ, there are still a LOT of high IQ Indians. Likewise, despite high European IQ there are comparatively few Europeans. So you can only assume the probability of a lower vs higher IQ. And you can assume norms, traditions, values, and institutions evolved to satisfy the majority of that population so you can expect cultural differences dependent upon group IQ.

    Reply addressees: @SatoshiGripper


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 15:40:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640378141028777984

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640373127795339265

  • There *IS* an advantage of a *distribution* of IQs. However, at present levels o

    There *IS* an advantage of a *distribution* of IQs. However, at present levels of knowledge, economy, science, and technology, there is a disadvantage to lower IQ’s. At present that’s anything under 85, but it’s heading toward 90, and in the future that might be 95 or more.

    That said, a highly logical and gifted society *IS* great. Everything is easier as IQ increases – for everyone. From self care, to avoiding harms and accidents, to the reduction of stress, to the length of life, to the creativity in the arts… everything.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 15:30:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640375860782940161

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640374424426762245

  • There *IS* an advantage of a *distribution* of IQs. However, at present levels o

    There *IS* an advantage of a *distribution* of IQs. However, at present levels of knowledge, economy, science, and technology, there is a disadvantage to lower IQ’s. At present that’s anything under 85, but it’s heading toward 90, and in the future that might be 95 or more.

    That said, a highly logical and gifted society *IS* great. Everything is easier as IQ increases – for everyone. From self care, to avoiding harms and accidents, to the reduction of stress, to the length of life, to the creativity in the arts… everything.

    Reply addressees: @ratfacedmouse


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 15:30:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640375860694794240

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640374424426762245

  • Q:”CURT: CAN YOU EXPLAIN THE FEMALE MIND?” (in a word: ‘prey’. (fear)) 1) OPPORT

    Q:”CURT: CAN YOU EXPLAIN THE FEMALE MIND?”
    (in a word: ‘prey’. (fear))

    1) OPPORTUNITY: Identification of novelties is easier (requires less skill) for the brain than excellences (requires more skill) -ie: children’s tastes vs adult tastes. (ie: shopping)

    2) CONSUMPTION: The brain identifies novelties that are possible resources for consumption – as such drives our attention to novelties.

    3) HYPERCONSUMPTION: The female brain seeks hyper-consumption for status just as the male seeks hyper-capitalization for status. Acquisition(material loss aversion) and Status(opportunity loss aversion) drive all human priorities.

    4) ATTENTION: The female brain seeks attention because the female brain seeks successful manipulation by the capture of attention, using seduction (from subtle approval to sexual), to acquire hyper-consumption and status.

    5) RESPONSIBILITY EVASION: The female brain fears being wrong, rarely if ever admits error, casts itself as a victim, and avoids responsibility for its instincts, intuitions, and choices at all times. (neurosis)

    6) MAXIMUM UTILITY IN HYPERCONSUMPTION: Novelties, that do not require skill but just basal instincts, offer opportunities for consumption, for hyperconsumption, for status, for attention, for manipulation by seduction, where the female can’t be wrong, produce the greatest incentive available to women (other than defense of her young).

    7) SAFETY: Most women seek safety by maximizing hyperconsumption, hypergamy, social relations, and minimum responsibility, as such they can ‘feel, love, care’ without risk. Why? These traits minimize the risk to her and her offspring. However, in the absence of offspring this becomes what we see as female selfishness and anti-sociality, and in numbers, anti-civilizational warfare (feminism-woke).

    8) NEGATIVE SELECTION: (this might hurt): Men select women by neoteny (fertility, youth, symmetry, gracility, femininity), where women select AGAINST neoteny. In other words, men drive evolution toward human domestication, and women drive evolution toward human primitivization. This is why it’s important to teach women what a ‘good man’ is because otherwise they will ‘race to the bottom’ – at least the vast majority will do so. So again, men created civilization and partly by domesticating women as much as one another.

    That’s about the most accurate description of female behavior you will ever need to understand all female behavior regardless of context.

    Seriously.
    Women are really that simple.
    And yes, men are really wallet objects, and women are really sex objects, and it turns out evolution did that out of necessity. So we develop rituals and myths to romanticize and socialize and institutionalize what is otherwise just physics at work.

    But nature has an inescapable law: “We are not equal and He Who Breeds Wins.”

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 15:14:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640371752113958912

  • Q:”CURT: CAN YOU EXPLAIN THE FEMALE MIND?” (in a word: ‘prey’. (fear)) 1) OPPORT

    Q:”CURT: CAN YOU EXPLAIN THE FEMALE MIND?”
    (in a word: ‘prey’. (fear))

    1) OPPORTUNITY: Identification of novelties is easier (requires less skill) for the brain than excellences (requires more skill) -ie: children’s tastes vs adult tastes. (ie: shopping)

    2) CONSUMPTION: The brain identifies novelties that are possible resources for consumption – as such drives our attention to novelties.

    3) HYPERCONSUMPTION: The female brain seeks hyper-consumption for status just as the male seeks hyper-capitalization for status. Acquisition(material loss aversion) and Status(opportunity loss aversion) drive all human priorities.

    4) ATTENTION: The female brain seeks attention because the female brain seeks successful manipulation by the capture of attention, using seduction (from subtle approval to sexual), to acquire hyper-consumption and status.

    5) RESPONSIBILITY EVASION: The female brain fears being wrong, rarely if ever admits error, casts itself as a victim, and avoids responsibility for its instincts, intuitions, and choices at all times. (neurosis)

    6) MAXIMUM UTILITY IN HYPERCONSUMPTION: Novelties, that do not require skill but just basal instincts, offer opportunities for consumption, for hyperconsumption, for status, for attention, for manipulation by seduction, where the female can’t be wrong, produce the greatest incentive available to women (other than defense of her young).

    7) SAFETY: Most women seek safety by maximizing hyperconsumption, hypergamy, social relations, and minimum responsibility, as such they can ‘feel, love, care’ without risk. Why? These traits minimize the risk to her and her offspring. However, in the absence of offspring this becomes what we see as female selfishness and anti-sociality, and in numbers, anti-civilizational warfare (feminism-woke).

    8) NEGATIVE SELECTION: (this might hurt): Men select women by neoteny (fertility, youth, symmetry, gracility, femininity), where women select AGAINST neoteny. In other words, men drive evolution toward human domestication, and women drive evolution toward human primitivization. This is why it’s important to teach women what a ‘good man’ is because otherwise they will ‘race to the bottom’ – at least the vast majority will do so. So again, men created civilization and partly by domesticating women as much as one another.

    That’s about the most accurate description of female behavior you will ever need to understand all female behavior regardless of context.

    Seriously.
    Women are really that simple.
    And yes, men are really wallet objects, and women are really sex objects, and it turns out evolution did that out of necessity. So we develop rituals and myths to romanticize and socialize and institutionalize what is otherwise just physics at work.

    But nature has an inescapable law: “We are not equal and He Who Breeds Wins.”

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 15:14:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640371751761715203

  • RT @DegenRolf: Relations between IQ and psychopathology were generally null or n

    RT @DegenRolf: Relations between IQ and psychopathology were generally null or negative, with high IQ associated with lower psychopathology…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 12:16:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640326834377113601

  • That isn’t a ‘black’ problem. That’s a developed world problem regardless of rac

    That isn’t a ‘black’ problem. That’s a developed world problem regardless of race. We have made high investment parenting too expensive.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 07:25:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640253746193088512

    Reply addressees: @Georgia__Swann

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640253039847124994

  • THE RACE AND IQ DEBATE IS OVER. FINALLY. We are done with the debate ok? Race di

    THE RACE AND IQ DEBATE IS OVER. FINALLY.
    We are done with the debate ok? Race differences in intelligence are predictable from brain function. It’s over. Thank you. Finally. No more anti-darwinian marxist nonsense please.

    Now can we get on with ‘this is largely a consequence… https://twitter.com/BronskiJoseph/status/1640065967702040576