(core) (sex differences)
Corrective Measures Needed for ‘undergrads’. 😉
P-Law requires we cognitively switch to the use of series (measures) rather than sets (ideals). So you can’t reduce everything to single test as (archaic) philosophical “set-morons” do. Mathiness, Verbalism, Ideals, and Sets are what prevented and still resist evolution into computation, operations, original measures, and ordinal tests.
But because you’ve been indoctrinated by religion, philosophy, and moral reasoning into ‘doing it wrong’ – simply because doing it wrong is simpler and requires less knowledge, it’s harder for you to learn how to ‘do it right’.
Everything we do: disambiguation into a system of measurement, by enumeration serialization and operationalization, producing ordinal measures, from which we produce tests by a series of ordinal measures.
So, Instead, we test the entire spectrum of sex differences in cognition just as we test the entire spectrum of testimony, reciprocity, and demonstrated interests, and the hierarchy of ternary logic at physical scale to trifunctional behaviors at macro scale.
So just as we have checklists for testimony(truth), reciprocity(morality), and demonstrated interests (facts), we have checklists for male and female differences – but the list is quite large, and this is only the first order of that list:
Masculine: Supply: predator, systematizing, over time, physical(outcomes), empirical thinking, political, loyal, harming, productive status via accumulation of responsibility for capital (capitalizing).
-versus-
Feminine: Demand: prey, empathizing, in time, emotional(experiential), magical thinking, social, devoted, undermining, parasitic, status via accumulating irresponsibiilty for capital (hyperconsumption).
Whenever you’re making a comparison between ‘left (feminine) and right (masculine) cognitive and moral biases, then you must run the entire list, lest you misapply causality.
Fast Focused Predator in time vs Reactive General Prey in time is just the beginning of the sex differences in brain organization that we too often reduce to ‘reals vs feels’.