RT @StevePender: As the only species capable of protecting Earth from existential threats to all life, it’s of highest importance that we p…
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-05 12:58:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654470519612137474
(If I was a white supremacist rather than a scientist I would state that east asians are superior despite that they selected for the highest neoteny at the cost of tolerance for competition, whereas whites selected for neoteny within the limits of tolerance for competition. South Eurasians selected for tribalism and low trust given it’s the intersection of four continents, but given it’s easiest to survive there have not experienced the culling of the underclasses as europeans and east asians have. Africans had difficulty with isolation and speciation in the presence of constant hybridization, at least until the bantu expansion (similar to the agrarian expansion in eurasia).
Reply addressees: @Nick65979825 @KingBoru_ @UsingLyft
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-04 17:09:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654171312036642842
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654168243706134536
Selection bias instead of complete explanation of all differences by most obvious, and simple difference, which is selection for domestication by isolation and speciation producing the four/five major races, and they hybridizations that occurred in response to the agrarian…
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-04 17:05:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654170497788018699
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654168243706134536
The best evidence is that every single measure if differences by country are reducible to IQ and IQ reducible to genetic composition of the polity.
Every. Single. One.
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-04 17:04:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654170023361904641
Reply addressees: @Nick65979825 @KingBoru_ @UsingLyft
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654167933562519577
(a) natural selection did differentiate between african and european populations by 2SD or more. (b) African populations have a disproportionate load in the lower quartiles. (c) existing statistical prediction you’re referring is under the same fallacy that we are only 1+% different from chimpanzees, without knowing the distribution of the influence of alleles and the combinations of alleles in genes as expressions, given that all expression is but probabilistic given the competition of interactions, the duration of expression, during what stage of development, given the influence of cellular proximity to one another during that development. (d) African populations demonstrate much deeper and faster maturity as defense against the aggressive cline of diseases on the continent, combined with the inability to isolate, adapt, and speciate relative to the out-of-africa expansions. In the speciation events: east Africa 70
followed by dry persian gulf now 85, tibetan plateu now 105, european plain now 100, and ob river region ??, produced the primary races and subsequent hybridizations, where isolation and necessity of cooperation combined with the adversity of the environment caused selection by domestication syndrome. (e) as for personality, Africans have lower self-regulation (agency), higher aggression, and oddly enough slightly higher extroversion, just as non africans have higher potential for autism (extreme male brains).
You’re doing correlative math without the knowledge of constructive biological processes. In other words you lack the knowledge to interpret the statistics, and are using such to reinforce a bias. The rest of us are scientists attempting to produce testimony to causality by grasping the causal relations between biological processes of development and the slow and steady process of accumulating genetic information which we do not understand the causality of, aside from obviously detrimental defect (developmental failure) or phenotypic expression (coloring) due to consistent limited variation in individual alleles.
Science consists of the process of discovering correlations top down and uncovering causations bottom up, until we have a formal logic of available operations at each scale of emergent increases in combinatoric complexity (as we do in chemistry, if less so in the standard model, and more by more complexity in the folding of proteins producing biological machines by change in charge we do not yet understand), then ‘mathiness’ which in economics we refer to as ‘pseudoscience’, (just as mathiness has stunted physics), is just another error that you and those like you who lack sufficient foundations in epistemology, logic, and the scientific method, as well as the disciplines necessary to test possibility of construction, waste our time with – and cause us to have to protect the commons of information against th harms you impose on them.
Reply addressees: @Nick65979825 @KingBoru_ @UsingLyft
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-04 16:43:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654164786119098370
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654143447400366080
RESPONSIBILITY
I would say that this year it has become far clearer that Responsibilty (Insurance, defense), is as foundational a concept in behavioral science as are Acquisition, Demonstrated Interest, Reciprocity, and Testimony, and is the divergent factor causing all behavioral differences because of sex differences in the responsibility vs consumption vs capitalization equilibrium.
Why is it that the left has worked to undermine the concept of responsibility along with reciprocity, meritocracy, proportionality, and hierarchy necessary to form a complex survivable polity able to continuously adapt to continuous change?
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-04 13:56:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654122879276171276
We have identified at least at thousand SNP variations that contribute to IQ, and that’s not enough for prediction because all genetic expression is probabalistic in competition during development – though the difference as I said, as with almost all variation from the other great apes is almost entirely by neotenic selection causing decreases in expression as stem cells migrate outward from the neural tube, slowing maturity giving greater time for development, under lower pressure of maturity, but at higher risk.
The authority on the subject is the largest lab doing the most work (Reich’s) and he has been not so subtly warning the academic world that the scale of the differences between the races is contrary to the postwar suppression of biological differences in response to the German adoption of american eugenics research and practice informed by Darwin and Spencer – who was the most influential philosopher prior to the world wars.
So you are welcome to try to find someone who understands these subjects better than I do – and you will find people who understand the stats, others who understand the biochemistry, others who understand the genetics, but as far as I know there aren’t many people who understand the operation of the brain better than I do, because in order to write about and teach the subject, I’ve had to exhaust that research. And there just isn’t anyone that’s outside of a small section of the AI commumity that seems to have a basic understanding of just how simple it is after all -despite the anxieties of philosophers.
Cheers
Reply addressees: @Nick65979825 @UsingLyft
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-04 13:37:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654118007227006976
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654114649489522688
FORMULA?
“Responsibility in Relation to Resources”
Women seek access to more resources without accumulating responsibiilty for them – but only to access them for use and consumption of them.
They accumulate irresponsibility in relation to resources, the way men accumulate responsibility in relation to resources.
This is the basic female algorithm because they are weaker prey animals with costly fragile dependent children who require males to compensate for weakness, prey condition, cost, fragility and dependence of themsevles and their offspring.
Everything is in equilibrium under ternary logic of the universe, and we need only balance the equation via construction from first principles to understand any given observable behavior.
Cheers
Curt
Reply addressees: @TheAutistocrat @neoCamelist @WalterIII
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-04 13:24:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654114872626495488
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654113335871262720
RE: ~”IQ ISN”T A PHYSICAL MEASURE”~
(short explanation of what causes IQ differences)
That’s in correct. Neural conductivity follows the same mathematical law as wires and undersea cables, where the law was first discovered. So neural response time is precisely what we are measuring.
The rest is determined by the organization of connectivity as neural stem cells migrate into position, and various of thirty or so molecules bait the tips of each cell into different regions of the brain, until they recieve enough impulse to form local inter-neuronal connectivity and begin ‘computing’ so to speak. Then finally the overall size of the brain (size matters), grey vs white matter density, and the environment that consists of the biochemistry of your brain that feeds the neurons, and the many developmental ‘errors’ that creep in due to accumulated genetic load (defects), and one evolutoinary difference Neoteny.
The uncomfortable truth that the scientific community suppresses out of self interest in survival is that human differences are due largely to on direction of evolution: neotenic selection, which trades aggression (impulse) for agency (consideration) necessary for social cooperation in increasingly scarce climates. Ergo the reason for performance differences between the four primary races is substantial, manifesting as difference in sizes of the classes, where social and economic class reflect the ability to posses the traits and intelligence to manage self regulation and therefore responsibility, because that is what humans have selected for: responsibility via neoteny.
Hence we observe IQ and neotenic differences by the four speciation events (Races): 1SD African to South Eurasion, 1SD South Eurasian To European and East Asian. And NW Europeans (north sea) have already lost 1SD from around 115 in early modernity to 100-102 today due to asymmetric reproduction. East asians are losing – particularly the Chinese, and Ashkenazim are losing too. Reason? Urbanization. Cities are IQ sinks because of the cost of children for high investment parents, and the cost of education, and women delaying reproduction for education and employement, versus the irrelevance of the cost of children for low investment parents.
So we attempt to judge the QUALITY of the organization of your brain with IQ tests by examining multiple capabilities – specifically among the feminine verbal empathizing vs masculine spatial systematizing division, because all skills roughly increase and decrease in parallel along whatever that sex ratio consist of, thus determining your neural performance, plasticity, and adaptability in time.
Reply addressees: @Nick65979825 @UsingLyft
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-04 13:02:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654109218453045253
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654003532847013888
RE: ~”IQ ISN”T A PHYSICAL MEASURE”~
(short explanation of what causes IQ differences)
That’s in correct. Neural conductivity follows the same mathematical law as wires and undersea cables, where the law was first discovered. So neural response time is precisely what we are measuring.
The rest is determined by the organization of connectivity as neural stem cells migrate into position, and various of thirty or so molecules bait the tips of each cell into different regions of the brain, until they recieve enough impulse to form local inter-neuronal connectivity and begin ‘computing’ so to speak. Then finally the overall size of the brain (size matters), grey vs white matter density, and the environment that consists of the biochemistry of your brain that feeds the neurons, and the many developmental ‘errors’ that creep in due to accumulated genetic load (defects), and one evolutoinary difference Neoteny.
The uncomfortable truth that the scientific community suppresses out of self interest in survival is that human differences are due largely to on direction of evolution: neotenic selection, which trades aggression (impulse) for agency (consideration) necessary for social cooperation in increasingly scarce climates. Ergo the reason for performance differences between the four primary races is substantial, manifesting as difference in sizes of the classes, where social and economic class reflect the ability to posses the traits and intelligence to manage self regulation and therefore responsibility, because that is what humans have selected for: responsibility via neoteny.
Hence we observe IQ and neotenic differences by the four speciation events (Races): 1SD African to South Eurasion, 1SD South Eurasian To European and East Asian. And NW Europeans (north sea) have already lost 1SD from around 115 in early modernity to 100-102 today due to asymmetric reproduction. East asians are losing – particularly the Chinese, and Ashkenazim are losing too. Reason? Urbanization. Cities are IQ sinks because of the cost of children for high investment parents, and the cost of education, and women delaying reproduction for education and employement, versus the irrelevance of the cost of children for low investment parents.
So we attempt to judge the QUALITY of the organization of your brain with IQ tests by examining multiple capabilities – specifically among the feminine verbal empathizing vs masculine spatial systematizing division, because all skills roughly increase and decrease in parallel along whatever that sex ratio consist of, thus determining your neural performance, plasticity, and adaptability in time.
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-04 13:02:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654109218675335170
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654003532847013888