Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • Why do men forgive women for their estrogen and progesterone mood swings but wom

    Why do men forgive women for their estrogen and progesterone mood swings but women don’t forgive men for our testosterone and adrenaline mood swings? Why do women get all the privileges and excuses and we get all the responsibilities? Why can’t we have reciprocity?

    😉
    (idea via…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-05 19:18:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654566160262635521

  • RT @nianello6: @curtdoolittle @michaelshermer “specialization of the feminine le

    RT @nianello6: @curtdoolittle @michaelshermer “specialization of the feminine left in harm/care and the weighing of the full spectrum moral…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-05 18:06:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654548042530398215

  • RT @ContraFabianist: The utility of shaming as a means of incremental suppressio

    RT @ContraFabianist: The utility of shaming as a means of incremental suppression decreases as heterogeneity increases.

    Shaming the out-g…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-05 18:02:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654547173898330112

  • “Feminine: Indirect and Social Over Time (Evil) -vs- Masculine: Direct and Physi

    “Feminine: Indirect and Social Over Time (Evil)
    -vs-
    Masculine: Direct and Physical In Time (Bad)”


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-05 16:22:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654521933130498055

  • (brilliant, social media conflict) –“Morals differ; moral judgements differ. Hu

    (brilliant, social media conflict)
    –“Morals differ; moral judgements differ. Humans assume a bias[felt and intuited] grounded in universal morality (this stemming from the “human race” non-sense) as opposed to an objective situationally relative universal morality [consisting of an equilibrium created by(1)] [reciprocity with-in the bounds of proportionality with-in the limits of infallibility].– Brandon Hayes @ThruTheHayes

    (1) Clarification added by CD


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-05 13:48:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654483213417345024

  • (brilliant) –“Shame is for in-group pressure not out-group pressure; shame used

    (brilliant)
    –“Shame is for in-group pressure not out-group pressure; shame used on out-groups emboldens them. The online world is creating an outlet for aggression that undermines all commons. {this is a solvable problem}”– Brandon Hayes @ThruTheHayes


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-05 13:45:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654482469301678082

  • Rolf, I shared this post (I share a lot of your posts) because the effect being

    Rolf, I shared this post (I share a lot of your posts) because the effect being described is altruistic punishment. And as such I viewed the study as perpetuating ‘what’s wrong’ with behavioral science: the tendency to seek a single frame of reference, denying the fact that while human variation in ability and expressed competence is genetic and developmental, human variation in valuation, bias, and particularly when regard to social and moral conflict originates in the mirror image of sex differences in cognition, with short term exclusive empathizing versus long term general systematizing. As such most of these signals in social media are due to the first time we can easily admix groups in moral conflict where normally we would separate by bias and interest, and express less altruistic punishment over our differences in moral valuation determined by cognitive sexual dimorphism.

    One of the principles I teach, is that describing emotional reactions or intentions appeals to moral bias (excuse making), where economic explanation of all human behavior results in a value neutral assessment of costs – which is what causes all emotional reactions, since all emotions are always and everywhere reducible to change in the state of demonstrated interests (resources of some kind that the individual or group depend upon).

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Reply addressees: @DegenRolf @ThruTheHayes


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-05 13:43:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654482059530739712

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654474528255254528

  • WHY DO COGNITIVELY FEMININE PEOPLE ENGAGE IN GENETIC, BIOLOGICAL, COGNITIVE, AND

    WHY DO COGNITIVELY FEMININE PEOPLE ENGAGE IN GENETIC, BIOLOGICAL, COGNITIVE, AND SOCIAL SCIENCE DENIAL?
    (it’s simple really)

    Sex Differences in Prediction of short term experiential empathizing vs Long term conseqential systematizing
    RESULTING IN
    Feminine Empathizing Magical Wishful Thinking to Evade Responsibility For Conflcit Resolution
    -vs-
    Masculine Systematizing Practical Empirical Thinking To Take Responsibility for Conflict Resolution
    AND
    Ethnic differences in cognitive dimorphism by sex bias caused by variation in neotenic evolution combined with social and economic selection pressure by isolation whether geographic or cultural.
    THERFORE
    Feminine Jewish Empathic Irresponsible Magical Thinking vs
    Masculine European Systemizing Responsible Empirical Thinking.

    The masculine ‘right’ can imagine the mind of a feminine ‘left’, and but the feminine ‘left’ can’t imagine the mind of the masculine right.

    Hence the specialization of the feminine left in harm/care and the weighing of the full spectrum moral factors by the masculine right.

    As a conseqence the feminine left seek irresponsibilty through exporting and externalizing all social, economic, political, miltary, and group competitive costs to the masculine right – while claiming they are virtuous rather than evading responsibilty and the costs of responsibility.

    The data is overwhelming in support of each of these statements.

    This is why we must create scientific, legal and institutional systems to prevent externalization of the consequences of irresponsibility and magical thinking so we maycontinue the western tradition of pursuing individual soverignty by the eradication of authority – meaning the maximization of responsibility of every individual prior to any participation or ‘say’ in the responsibile governance of the polity.

    What this means? “Don’t take women (feminine minds) seriously in matters of social, economic, political, and strategic questions becaue they are effectively and conveniently the equivalent of face blind, color blind, tone deaf, and naive to any scale phenomena that requires systematizing and valuation of outcomes over time.

    The preware behavioral science of freud, boaz, marx, is all pseudoscience, that has failed every test. The postwar revolt against the darwinian-spencer eugenic movement by mass production of pseudoscience (almost, but not exclusively by jewish authors) using the feminine marxist myth of oppression (vs domestication into responsibilty) is equivalent to the mass production of abrahamic religion by the same means in response the the greek and roman conquest and it’s reliance on reason and empiricism.

    Female > jewish > abrahamic > marxist-pomo-woke fraudulent dysgenic devolution
    Is the antithesis of:
    Male > european > aristotelian > greco-roman-germanic-anglo empirical eugenic evolution that has dragged mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffering, early death and the victimization of a nature all but hostile to our existence.

    Probably over most heads, but this is the ‘science’ underlying everything political.

    Why?

    Because while genetics largely determine variation in human competency, sex differences in cognition determine all variation in human biases.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Reply addressees: @michaelshermer


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-05 13:33:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654479444076109824

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654107794306629632

  • RT @DegenRolf: The online shaming of others is motivated by schadenfreude, not b

    RT @DegenRolf: The online shaming of others is motivated by schadenfreude, not by social justice concerns. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4359608 https://…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-05 13:01:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654471381046763523

  • RT @StevePender: Eradicate any malware you have in your head about blank slate t

    RT @StevePender: Eradicate any malware you have in your head about blank slate theory. We’re hardwired to a large extent at birth. The evid…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-05 12:59:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654470873749790722