tweak
Consider F:Accessible Capital vs M:Earned Capital
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-08 03:35:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1655416127802015749
Reply addressees: @WalterIII @CrackerYakub
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1655405614905053184
This. It’s the most explanatory and devastating criticism of the effect women and those who pander to them have had on education, the resulting decline in education, and decline in competency of the population because of the dominance of women in education.
As I’ve said… https://twitter.com/WalterIII/status/1655209928972443655
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-07 21:55:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1655330440381702144
(Start with: cross race crib research with babies.)
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-07 15:01:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1655226395088367618
Reply addressees: @freeusefulinfo @aldafa_ir @huangkuan @RichardHanania
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1655152959120977920
I’m trying to determine whether you’re agreeing with Wade’s hypothesis or not. 😉
There is no contradiction or conflict between my work and his whatsoever. There is a conflict of opinion over whether race, class, and sex differences are extant or substative, and there is a conflict over the rate of genetic change. However genetic research is increasingly exposing that the differences exist, are substantive, and that rates of change are more rapid than we’d assumed. The research in biology demonstrates that neoteny or domestication syndrom is the aggregate direction (selection pressure) of human evolution, because cooperation at increasing scale in increasing anonymity places greater demand on cooperation, reciprocity-altruistic_punishment, tolerance-forbearance, loyalty-devotion, and gregariousness.
Reply addressees: @freeusefulinfo @aldafa_ir @huangkuan @RichardHanania
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-07 14:05:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1655212348485824515
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1655151570487595010
Accusations are not falsifications.
Yes self regulation and impulse control are increased by neotenic evolution and resulting domestication syndrome.
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-07 13:25:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1655202113834610689
Reply addressees: @freeusefulinfo @aldafa_ir @huangkuan @RichardHanania
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1655152959120977920
unfortunately no. in fact the bottom is more of a drag on the top than the top can compensate for.
And Yes I’ve exhausted every possibility imaginable, but the ‘great filter’ isn’t disease, geology, climate, the solar system, asteroids, or nearby stellar events, but our false presumtion that we can continue prosperity which requires energy conservation per capital while not also driving the median competency upward such that humans are able to adapt as fast as our invention allows us.
Reply addressees: @DajaniRiad @SovereigntyKing @BrianRoemmele
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-06 20:06:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654940827204956160
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654928364799504384
You’re correct. Causal Sequence: (a) race differences in neoteny (b) race differences in rate and depth of maturity (c) race differences in intolerance, aggression, and impulsivity. Causal Conditions: selection for cooperation during isolation during expansion, especially in…
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-06 20:03:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654939915174412291
Reply addressees: @aldafa_ir @freeusefulinfo @huangkuan @RichardHanania
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654938776190451712
WHAT’S WRONG W/ STUDIES OF BEHAVIOR COMBINED WITH SOCIAL MEDIA?
What’s wrong with behavioral science: the tendency to seek a single frame of reference (equality) denying the fact that while human variation in ability and expressed competence is genetic and developmental regardless of sex, human variation in valuation, bias, and particularly when regard to social and moral conflict originates in the opposites (the opposite of equality) created by sex differences in cognition, with feminine short term exclusive empathizing avoiding responsibility to obtain status versus masculine long term general systematizing to seek responsibility to obtain status.
Most conflict in social media, and the reason for its continued investment, is due to the expression of attention seeking (validation), virtue signaling(moral bias or ‘team’ membership) status-seeking (material), and altruistic punishment (defense of status, and moral bias).
Most signals of altruistic punishment (negativity) in social media are due to such media being the first time we can easily admix groups into moral conflict where normally we would separate in space, time, and socialization by bias and interest, and express less altruistic punishment over our differences in our moral valuation that’s determined by our cognitive sexual dimorphism.
One of the principles I teach is that describing emotional reactions or intentions appeals to moral bias (excuse making), where economic explanation of all human behavior results in a value neutral assessment of costs – which is what causes all emotional reactions, since all emotions are always and everywhere reducible to change in the state of demonstrated interests (resources of some kind that the individual or group depend upon).
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-06 17:29:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654901236632633346
WHAT’S WRONG W/ STUDIES OF BEHAVIOR COMBINED WITH SOCIAL MEDIA?
I view understand most studies in the soft (pseudo) sciences as perpetuating ‘what’s wrong’ with behavioral science: the tendency to seek a single frame of reference (equality) denying the fact that while human variation in ability and expressed competence is genetic and developmental regardless of sex, human variation in valuation, bias, and particularly when regard to social and moral conflict originates in the opposites (the opposite of equality) created by sex differences in cognition, with feminine short term exclusive empathizing avoiding responsibility to obtain status versus masculine long term general systematizing to seek responsibility to obtain status.
Most conflict in social media, and the reason for its continued investment, is due to the expression of attention seeking (validation), virtue signaling(moral bias or ‘team’ membership) status-seeking (material), and altruistic punishment (defense of status, and moral bias).
Most signals of altruistic punishment (negativity) in social media are due to such media being the first time we can easily admix groups into moral conflict where normally we would separate in space, time, and socialization by bias and interest, and express less altruistic punishment over our differences in our moral valuation that’s determined by our cognitive sexual dimorphism.
One of the principles I teach is that describing emotional reactions or intentions appeals to moral bias (excuse making), where economic explanation of all human behavior results in a value neutral assessment of costs – which is what causes all emotional reactions, since all emotions are always and everywhere reducible to change in the state of demonstrated interests (resources of some kind that the individual or group depend upon).
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-06 17:29:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654900252841844738
(sarcasm) Why do women project and personalize everything? 😉
I’m just playing off Sarah Dawn’s video to repeat the point.
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-06 00:05:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654638371480666115
Reply addressees: @lovelywhite110
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654621787190177793