RT @curtdoolittle: WHY DO BOTH SEXES NEED A MOTHER UNTIL AGE NINE, AND BOTH SEXES NEED A FATHER AFTER AGE NINE?
(answer here) (note: vers…
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-13 08:31:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657302474036854785
Well the point is that we need both parents. And the less comfortable point is that we need at least two to three siblings.
I don’t make the laws of nature I just counter denying, evading, or lying about them – we always pay the costs. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-12 23:38:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657168325682556929
Reply addressees: @lovelywhite110
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657166838562713600
WHY DO BOTH SEXES NEED A MOTHER UNTIL AGE NINE, AND BOTH SEXES NEED A FATHER AFTER AGE NINE?
(answer here) (note: version edited to correct typos)
It’s not just boys that require fathers; it’s girls too. And a lot of these girls who are broken are so because of a lack of paternal reinforcement of self-regulation, including discounting of others’ opinions, accusations, and biases.
Women can’t be attracted to men who are good for them if (a) they don’t know – meaning ‘feel’ – what good means because they have no examples they’ve learned from, (b) they can’t self-regulate their female impulses by masculine intolerance for exceeding social and political limits, (c) and they can’t self-regulate against conformity – especially to either the pettiness and divisiveness of ‘mean girls’ or to the bad female behavior that manifests when women lack children and express their hyper-empathizing hyper-consumption, hyper-status seeking, hypergamy and emotional instability instead.
Women evolved all these ‘hyper-traits’ to extend their emotions and nervous system over a passel of fragile offspring.
-vs
Men evolved hyperphysical, mechanical, territorial, and political traits for organizing a non-fragile polity for the benefit of women and children.
And so:
Men have no need for status and responsibility without responsibility for women and children.
-vs-
Women demand irresponsibility, hyperattention, and hyperconsumption, hyper status, and hypergamy UNLESS they are responsible for children.
As such, the sexes, always and everywhere are not only unequal but mirror images of one another. Always and everywhere.
All human differences in biases and preferences originate in sex differences in sensation, perception, prediction, valuation, cognition, and intersocial relation.
The differences in male and female brains are well understood despite postwar pseudoscientific suppression by the activist left.
They are:
Feminine prey bias, lateral (more), empathizing in time, seeking competition by accumulating attention, redistribution, conducting offense by gossiping rallying saming and undermining, and seeking status through evasion of responsibility for commons, accumulating resources of others, displaying hyperconsumption, and hypergamy.
-vs-
Masculine predator bias, longitudinal (faster), systematizing over time, seeking competition by accumulating skills, allies, influence and resources, conducting offense by demonstration of competency in physical, political, or conceptual achievement, gaining status by responsibility for commons.
Humans domesticated one another. The singular direction of human evolution over the past 130k years is just neoteny: domestication syndrome that trades lowering aggression for extending development, producing increasing self regulation and resulting opportunity for cooperation – and oddly, a longer lifetime.
Otherwise we’re still the great ape underneath.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute.
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-12 20:41:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657123866580250630
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657098328708898842
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
WHY DO BOTH SEXES NEED MOTHER UNTIL AGE NINE, AND BOTH SEXES NEED FATHER AFTER AGE NINE?
(answer here)
It’s not boys that require fathers; it’s girls. And a lot of these girls who are broken are so because of a lack of paternal reinforcement of self-regulation and discounting of others’ opinions, accusations or bias.
Women can’t be attracted to men who are good for them if (a) they don’t know what it means, and (b) they can’t self-regulate female impulses (c) they can’t self-regulate against conformity – especially to female behavior when women lack children and express their hyper-empathizing hyperconsumption, hyper-status seeking, hypergamy and instability instead.
Women evolved all these ‘hyper-traits’ to extend her emotions and nervous system over a passel of fragile offspring, just as men developed hyperphysical, mechanical, and political traits for organizing a non-fragile polity for the benefit of women and children.
Men have no need for status and responsibility without responsibility for women and children.
Women demand irresponsibility, hyperattention, and hyperconsumption, hyper status, and hypergamy UNLESS they are responsible for children.
The sexes, always and everywhere are mirror images of one another. Always and everywhere.
All human differences in biases and preferences originate in sex differences in sensation, perception, prediction, valuation, cognition, and intersocial relation.
The differences in male female brains are well understood despite postwear pseudoscientific suppression by the activist left.
Feminine prey bias, empathizing in time, seeking competition by accumulating attention, redistribution, conducting offense by gossiping rallying saming and undermining, and seeking status through evasion of responsibility for commons, accumulating resources of others, displaying hyperconsumption, and hypergamy.
-vs-
Masculine predator bias, systmatizing over time, seeking competition by accumulating skills, allies, influence and resources, conducting offense by demonstration of competency in physical, political, or conceptual achievement, gaining status by responsibility for commons.
Humans domesticated one another. The singular direction of human evolution over the past 130k years is just neoteny: domestication syndrome that trades lowering aggression for extending development, producing increasing self regulation and resulting opportunity for cooperation.
Otherwise we’re still the great ape underneath.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1657098328708898842
WHY DO BOTH SEXES NEED MOTHER UNTIL AGE NINE, AND BOTH SEXES NEED FATHER AFTER AGE NINE?
(answer here)
It’s not boys that require fathers; it’s girls. And a lot of these girls who are broken are so because of a lack of paternal reinforcement of self-regulation and discounting of others’ opinions, accusations or bias.
Women can’t be attracted to men who are good for them if (a) they don’t know what it means, and (b) they can’t self-regulate female impulses (c) they can’t self-regulate against conformity – especially to female behavior when women lack children and express their hyper-empathizing hyperconsumption, hyper-status seeking, hypergamy and instability instead.
Women evolved all these ‘hyper-traits’ to extend her emotions and nervous system over a passel of fragile offspring, just as men developed hyperphysical, mechanical, and political traits for organizing a non-fragile polity for the benefit of women and children.
Men have no need for status and responsibility without responsibility for women and children.
Women demand irresponsibility, hyperattention, and hyperconsumption, hyper status, and hypergamy UNLESS they are responsible for children.
The sexes, always and everywhere are mirror images of one another. Always and everywhere.
All human differences in biases and preferences originate in sex differences in sensation, perception, prediction, valuation, cognition, and intersocial relation.
The differences in male female brains are well understood despite postwear pseudoscientific suppression by the activist left.
Feminine prey bias, empathizing in time, seeking competition by accumulating attention, redistribution, conducting offense by gossiping rallying saming and undermining, and seeking status through evasion of responsibility for commons, accumulating resources of others, displaying hyperconsumption, and hypergamy.
-vs-
Masculine predator bias, systmatizing over time, seeking competition by accumulating skills, allies, influence and resources, conducting offense by demonstration of competency in physical, political, or conceptual achievement, gaining status by responsibility for commons.
Humans domesticated one another. The singular direction of human evolution over the past 130k years is just neoteny: domestication syndrome that trades lowering aggression for extending development, producing increasing self regulation and resulting opportunity for cooperation.
Otherwise we’re still the great ape underneath.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute.
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-12 19:00:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657098328394326078
They are both reflections of sex differences in cognition with the feminine prey response responsible for offspring and consumption in time seeking status by irresponsibiity for comons, vs the masculine predator stronger sex responsible for territory and resources over time seeking status by responsibility for commons. This is the origin (causality) of all human differences in cognitive bias. Everything else is neotenic evolution, genetic load, and developmental stress. So the disambiguation between oppression (social stress in hierarchy) and conspiracy (political stress by competitors) assists in maintaining causality (construction of all explanation from first principles (causes)).
You’re using the feminine framing in both cases. Males or Females may oppress females (actualy it’s domestication of their undermining, hyperconsumption and hypergamy). And Males may conspire to compete for dominance within group (to domesticate, to produce superior ends, or prey upon). But outsiders amplfiy the problem creating unity internally against externals (war). Hence the universal historical elite display of creating group cohesion through warfare whether the threat existed or not.
Reply addressees: @ViriatusII
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-12 12:31:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657000648213184512
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656970449668960257
CONSERVATIVES AREN’T STUPID
One more bit. Oppression narratives are the cognitively female and liberal version of cognitively male and conservative conspiracy narratives.
This sex difference in cognitive biases originates in sex differences in status seeking. Females seek status by evasion of responsibility and hyperconsumption, while males seek status by accumulatino of responsibilty and captialization.
So, the difference as in all things left vs right, is that we take male antisocial nonsense seriously because males are dangerous, and we ignore female antisocial nonsense because women aren’t dangerous.
At least, women weren’t dangerous until given the franchise. Now the opposite is true, and the present age is caused by the noise as the signal of women’s influence in politics travels through the civilizations institutional, traditional, normative, habitual, and cognitive capital structures.
This particular problem (which I can’t fully determine whether is cultural or biological) has allowed the industrialization of the female method of antisocial behavior using oppression narratives to take root in a population whose education, consumption, and voting is dominated by white females. (white females are the only group that defects from their ethnicity.
We endured marxism as we brought the lower classes into the franchise – a search for control. Now we’re enduring feminism as we bring females in to the franchise – a search for contrrol.
And unfortunately we’ve not falsified the female search for control as we have the lower class search for control.
🙁
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-12 01:26:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656833069742006273
HOW DOES HOMOSEXUALITY PLAY INTO EVOLUTION?
Ugh. I don’t really want to go into this subject even though I do understand the issue. But ‘pubic service calls’.
So:
In general, all humans develop probabilistically, starting with genes, but later dependent upon the environment in the womb.
As such, humans are born within probabilistic limits that either cause miscarriage, or not – and not according to an optimum plan. In fact human adaptive variation requires variation between individuals.
As such, we are all of us a mixture of female and male sex organ development AND the LATER cognitive emotional (brain) development by the division of feminine empathizing and male systematizing traits.
So there is a developmental relation but not necessarily dependence upon the physical by the instinctual and personality traits.
At present (a) homosexuality tends to run in families (b) it tends to occur after the first child (c) there may or may not be some environmental trigger that impedes development (d) women(females) are sexually plastic and men less so.
So homosexuality is a birth (developmental) defect that isn’t severe enough to cause a miscarriage. The reason it doesn’t isn’t yet known, but is likely due to the late maturity of these cognitive and emotional processes vs the early development of the physical.
A study of the differences between early and late births – even by so much as days – provides some fascinating insight into late stage development of the brain, emotions, personality, and yes, even handedness.
It isn’t clear that in history – at least prior to agrarianism, that sex preference was relevant enough to reproduction to select against. It isn’t clear if it evolved during agrarianism. It isn’t clear if there is a viral, bacterial, chemical, immunological difference in modernity that is having some effect.
I suspect we will know in the next thirty years. All that’s preventing it now is the willingness to perform the research.
And I am fairly sure it will be detectable and possibly correctable in utero or post partum within the same period of time.
I hope this helps.
Cheers
Reply addressees: @OtonielFilho5 @bierlingm
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-11 19:55:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656749953920778243
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656745308078915587
WHY YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND CONSERVATIVES – BECAUSE YOU LITERALLY CAN’T.
You may not understand this, but biological lateralization caused hemispheric mirroring. (just as the neocortext was caused by mirroring layers.) But timing actions between the two competing hemispheres required prioritization – a division of labor. The division of labor evolved into a division of time and scope requiring equal ‘computation’ (labor) into: predator (left bias) vs prey(right bias), which in turn developed into the masculine, left, systematizing over time, and the feminine, right, empathizing in time.
And yes, as in all personality traits, given that all development is only probabilistic, there is some overlap between the sexes in sex cognitive bias – meaning that there are some men who demonstrate a priority of feminine empathizing, and a smaller segment of some women who demonstrate a priority of masculine systematizing.
This really means that we mature from childhood selfishness, to young adult empathizing, to mature adult systematizing and we can observe this in the different rates of maturity between females(early short) and males(late and long).
In other words, you are demonstrating feminine, young adult, prey, interpersonally responsible, empathizing, in time (feels), instead of the masculine, adult, predator, politically responsible bias prioritizing systematizing over time (reals).
This means you may not be cognitively psychologically and emotionally capable of political decision (requiring systemazing at scale over time), any more than a color blind or tone deaf person is capable of judgement of color or tone.
This is why women so strongly bias left, while men bias right. And why the west developed almost all innovation in ideas, reason empiricism technology science, and medicine. Beacuse those things require truth-before-face regardless of cost to self image, status, and the competence or dominance hierarchies. But the feminine mind cannot tolerate truth before face at the cost of those same costs.
And yes as far as I know I understand this (actually the leadership of our organization does) better than the rest of the world combined.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
Reply addressees: @NATOFact @anneapplebaum
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-11 18:13:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656724224612921347
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656712970410377232
Young ignorant men seeking status through intellectual competency should learn to ask more questions instead of making vain assertions.
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-10 22:31:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656426785481924609
Reply addressees: @GracianoGreen @Scatolalia
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656423662327672837
I can do many things cautiously and precisely when needed, and I can do many other things imprecisely and incautiously when unworthy. 😉
I know how minds work. I teach it. I give talks on it. I write about it. And you know what? They’re simple really. Nature uses many of anything whenever it can. So sophistication is emergent from the complexity of interations not the complexity of constructions.
BTW: there is only one law in the universe given that there exists only a difference in pressure, Given that one difference evolution will produce the laws of the universe, in all it’s richness simply by ordinary trial and error.
Reply addressees: @Scatolalia
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-10 18:39:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656368300094550016
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656365228865515531