Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • CORRECTIONS 1 – We can adapt a population’s IQ in as few as three and no more th

    CORRECTIONS
    1 – We can adapt a population’s IQ in as few as three and no more than six generations simply by reducing the bottom and repeat criminals – and the bottom is a huge drag on society, economy, and politics, and criminals are worse.
    2 – It certainly appears that education in the sciences, converting many particular rules to a few general universal rules improved not iq, but demonstrated intelligence, by a half to a full standard deviation.
    3 – It certainly appears that education in our work (don’t worry about it) in logical and behavioral science does about the same as did the physical sciences.
    4 – No population on earth is prohibited from near to western or eastern success if they increase their IQ by education and regulated reproduction, and the rule of law that performs natural selection as a consequence.
    5 – No population can adhere to natural law and achieve economic, social, and political prosperity without either the resource curse or raising their average IQ above ~92 to 95. And the higher above 100, the better, because only people above 105 can learn by reading instructions, repair machines, or self educate. And economic complexity is increasing every year, meaning intellectual demands on a population increase every year.

    I don’t make the laws of the universe. But it’s my job and the job of our organization to try to prevent people from lying about the laws of the universe, and the consequences for mankind when we try to evade them.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @dosontheshinshi @MudKevin @Barbarian_Brain


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 17:20:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670119353918926848

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670108234487586818

  • Q: “ARE THE EDUCATED LESS SMART” (YES) 1) It’s true statistically, and it has to

    Q: “ARE THE EDUCATED LESS SMART” (YES)

    1) It’s true statistically, and it has to be, because in the first part, pre 1960 it required at least a 115 IQ to enter any college, and now it’s possible for people with a 100 IQ and half the population to get into college.

    2) The second is due to the marxification of education in all the behavioral pseudosciences and the liberal (literary) arts, populated with these people. So we are seing the marxificadtion of civilization into pseudoscience, just as the christian’s overhwlemed the greek academies, and ushered in the ages of ignorance and decline.

    3) The third is the marxification of professors who not only seek self aggrandizement, but teach sedition against western civilization’s rule of law and individual responsibility.

    4) The fourth is decline in IQ due to urbanization, asymmetric reproduction, and non-selective imigration.

    5) The fifth is sortition largely due to urbanization and separation of the classes in the work force, which is the deprivation of the working and lower classes of access to the intelligent and educated – and visa versa, the deprivation of the educated from the demands of the lower middle to lower classes.

    6) Worse we are still ‘working off’ (casting off) the institutionalized ignorance of the introgression of semitic, jewish, female magical thinking and pseudoscience into the academy both pre and postwar, not only in marxism but in the assault on rule of law, meritocracy, responsibility by boaz, freud, marx, lewontin and gould, the entire frankfurt(culturla marxism) and postmodern(anti-truth) traditions, the anti family feminists in friedan, the libertarians rand and rothbard, the legal positivists rez, kelsen, dworkin, the mathematicians and physicists cantor, bohr, and einstien. And hundreds more. The two disasters that were ethnically european were both of southern european stock with the hunchback italian Gramsci, and the despondent brazilian Freire.

    So the evidence is that we have the same number of contributors to intellectual progress as we had in 1963 but we have many more people who ‘think’ they are educated.

    I’m not normal, but I eat most PhDs like pringles with beer. Because the academy is an ideological pseudo-religious disaster outside of the stem fields, and even there is questionable.

    No I don’t like working on this subject because it’s depressing and exasperating to realize we are living in an age of new mysticism – a pseudoscientific religious revolt against european civilization because the intellectual, psychological, and emotional demands of european civilization that produce the gains of european civilization are higher than the demands of all other civilizations combined.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @diplodink @digitildream @realdanstilwell


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 13:54:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670067479526232065

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670061562218926081

  • THE HIERARCHY OF LIMITS FOR PUBLIC INTELLECTUALS Dr Peterson achieves success by

    THE HIERARCHY OF LIMITS FOR PUBLIC INTELLECTUALS
    Dr Peterson achieves success by satisfying an unsatisfied audience.
    All public intellectuals are eventually subject to audience capture, in a hierarchy of most true and smallest audience to the most desired and the broadest audience – not the other way around.
    I have greater freedom than Dr Peterson to address the hard problems than those like him who are subject to audience capture.
    While we work with overlapping scientific reserach, Dr Peterson works from the premise of theraputic utility in matters of counsel, I work from the premise of judicial decidabilty in matters of conflict.
    My audience is small and selects for truth at all costs, because I (we) select for decidability regardless of preference or desirability.
    The people most dedicated to truth over face or preference eventually end up in my camp.
    Decidable Truth is a filter for character and adulthood, both of which are but tests of responsibility.
    -Cheers

    Reply addressees: @Buck3DX @jordanbpeterson


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 10:11:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670011199340019712

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669996488099758081

  • There are no plumbers with sub 85 Iqs. Those people arent capable of maintaining

    There are no plumbers with sub 85 Iqs. Those people arent capable of maintaining regular employment, or performing any labor with any skill. Violent criminals are self selecting. Eliminate violent criminals and sub 85s from reproduction, and thats all that matters. That’s soft…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 04:32:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669925885657399299

    Reply addressees: @mcsmokeyton

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669908725706940417

  • You dont cut anyone – you constrain their reproduction

    You dont cut anyone – you constrain their reproduction.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 04:21:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669923166997577729

    Reply addressees: @xMajorKills

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669913853772152833

  • it’s not cultural. it’s slightly worse as you move left on the distribution and

    it’s not cultural. it’s slightly worse as you move left on the distribution and slightly better as you move right on the distribution but this is a good rule of thumb for western civ.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 02:07:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669889481036447744

    Reply addressees: @MakingMoneyFast

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669888209390583809

  • Relationships: Its not asymmetric submission but symmetric deference to domains

    Relationships: Its not asymmetric submission but symmetric deference to domains of responsibility.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 00:57:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669871968592490496

  • Relationships: Its not asymmetric submission but symmetric deference to domains

    Relationships: Its not asymmetric submission but symmetric deference to domains of responsibility.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 00:57:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669871968533852160

  • RT @PaoloShirasi: “Polygenic predictors of intelligence test performance (based

    RT @PaoloShirasi: “Polygenic predictors of intelligence test performance (based on genome-wide association meta-analyses of data from 269,…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 00:36:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669866500230901764

  • RT @bswud: A study followed 411 South London men from age 8-9 in the early 1960s

    RT @bswud: A study followed 411 South London men from age 8-9 in the early 1960s through their lives. In the study, they reported committin…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 00:34:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669866031592927232