Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • RT @erikbrus25: @J_Armstrong_TN @antigg860413 @xMajorKills @agent8698 @curtdooli

    RT @erikbrus25: @J_Armstrong_TN @antigg860413 @xMajorKills @agent8698 @curtdoolittle Race differences explained in these 2 clips plus 1 lin…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 23:46:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670216450886324226

  • Because you wouldnt know any of them. And yes I brought up Lynn. πŸ˜‰ I could have

    Because you wouldnt know any of them.
    And yes I brought up Lynn. πŸ˜‰ I could have mentioned Watson, Flynn, Nyborg, Gottfredson, Eysenck, or any of a hundred other names. People who have devoted their careers to the subject.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 22:12:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670192796689481728

    Reply addressees: @helenfromhel @Barbarian_Brain @dosontheshinshi @MudKevin

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670190776767111169

  • I am quite sure that Mr Weschler would understand the phrasing as “understanding

    I am quite sure that Mr Weschler would understand the phrasing as “understanding the physical and biological processes that result in neurological differences that we attempt to measure as (g), and express as IQ.”

    I am also very current in the cognitive sciences, and especially, as I’ve demonstrated in this series of posts, with the operational description of the biological process of experience across the spectrum.

    Not that you’re smart enough or intellectually honest enough to comprehend it. πŸ˜‰

    At this point I’m feeding a psychologically disturbed troll, and the utility of doing so as a means of educating the audience has ended.

    Cheers.

    Reply addressees: @helenfromhel @Barbarian_Brain @dosontheshinshi @MudKevin


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 22:04:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670190644260732931

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670177179903180803

  • 1) People with higher IQ have greater self regulation (yes) 2) People with highe

    1) People with higher IQ have greater self regulation (yes)
    2) People with higher IQ have less incentive to act immoraly. (yes) Partly because they associate with people who also have higher IQs, have higher chances of being caught, but have greater opportunities for reciprocity.
    3) People with higher IQ commit fewer crimes.

    We MIGHT argue that the distribution of immorality is normal, but the evidence that we act upon it otherwise.

    It’s the same reason so many sociopaths are indistinguishable from normal, happy, succesful people: it’s just in everyone’s benefit, especially your own, to act morally, because cooperation is so much more rewarding than immorality and crime.

    So no, eugenics has been profoundly successful everywhere in every civ. Read Harpending on “Genetic Pacification” and any other study of the decline inc riminality in europ with manorialism and hanging.

    Read what rice farming does to behavior.

    Reply addressees: @XLColdJ @xMajorKills


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 19:46:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670156072252784645

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670150079003480066

  • DEMONSTRATED INTELLIGENCE The brain is relatively simple operationally. Neurons

    DEMONSTRATED INTELLIGENCE
    The brain is relatively simple operationally. Neurons are quite individually simple, but can produce profound complexity in combination, in layers that peform different functinos, in microcolumns that are the primary processing unit, and and nerual colums tha combine them, and brain regions that connect to one another.
    Neural performance follows the same formula as undersea cables (and all cables for that matter) so the combination of neural organization, neural development, balance between white and grey matter, resulting resistance, and available resources (chemical balance, or health) determine how successful are ‘computations’, connections, durability, and therefore pattern development and memory.
    So IQ is a measure of generalized neural response time by testing a series of faculties divided by age to compensate for the fact that we tend to learn more with age. These tests include subtests for pattern recogition and learned knowlege and the intersection of both.
    There is a slight difference in the organization (development and interconnections) in male and female brains. First, bilateral creatures with bilaterial brains must find a means of decision making (priority) in order to time actions. Second the means of doing so has evolved largely to reflect male predator over time and bias to the empirical prediction of environmental state, vs female prey in time (empathizing) and bias to interpersonal prediction of emotional state.
    This results in the feminine empathizing/verbal vs the masculine systematizing/spatial, and the female hyperconsumptive in time and male hypercapitalizing over time – both of which reflect needs of the reproductive strategy of each (female her offspring) male (brothers and cousins and their territorial resources and collection of females and their offspring).
    And it also results in masculine pursuit of responsibility for commons in order to obtain status despite risks, and female pursuit of hyperconsumption and irresponisiblity for commons by creating demands from men, as a means of evading risk.
    The result is that men invent everything of consequence other than children, and women in politics has been a catastrophe, even if women in the economy has been beneficial.
    Now all of us get better at what challenges and fulfills us without causing us to fail. Ergo despite IQ improving learning times, people with different IQ’s pursue interests that vary so that they satisfy challenge and fulfillment to the best of theire ability and opportunity.
    And so the guy with a 105 IQ that fixes cars is going to be better at it over time than the guy who fixes or advances complex mathematical formulae. Because both would fail at one another’s jobs. The lower IQ at the ability, and the higher IQ at interst.
    Ergo DEMONSTRATED INTELLIGENCE is like applied science: it’s how you apply the resources of your intelligence and knowledge successfully or not.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @Barbarian_Brain @dosontheshinshi @MudKevin


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 19:40:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670154542493605890

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670148964333617153

  • You’re proving my point that women can’t tell the difference between truth and p

    You’re proving my point that women can’t tell the difference between truth and preference – and lying as I’ve documented in detail, and explained with excruiciating precision.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 19:19:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670149272879214593

    Reply addressees: @helenfromhel

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670148666483417088

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @_markenau @digitildream @realdanstilwell (Eugenics is about

    RT @curtdoolittle: @_markenau @digitildream @realdanstilwell (Eugenics is about race? Thats not true. Eugenic reproduction benefits every r…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 17:36:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670123162355265538

  • (Eugenics is about race? Thats not true. Eugenic reproduction benefits every rac

    (Eugenics is about race? Thats not true. Eugenic reproduction benefits every race. The difference is that given race differences in average IQ (a lot, except between east asians(105) and western europeans(103)), some populations require radical reduction of their ‘unfit’. So all races are affected, but some races are affected more than others – but that just means the benefit for those more affected is greater than the benefit of those less affected.)

    Reply addressees: @_markenau @digitildream @realdanstilwell


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 17:36:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670123138586140673

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670120079986421762

  • The Eugenics program was successful when limited to constraint on reproduction (

    The Eugenics program was successful when limited to constraint on reproduction (single child, or sterilization), and hanging of serial criminals (elimination). That is ‘soft’ eugenics that we have practiced since we began domesticating animals. The industrial revolution eliminated the constraint on dysgenic reproduction and this is why our genetics are declining and one of the two reasons IQ is declining (other than immigration). When IQ is the single most important property of a population that affects every other aspect of life more so than any other.

    There are only four factors that determine the relative quality of life of a population:
    1) Homogeneity
    2) Scale
    3) IQ
    4) Rule of law by the natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity we call ‘tort’.

    That’s just math. It’s inviolable

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @XLColdJ @xMajorKills


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 17:29:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670121380652646400

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670120192880558080

  • Environment has almost no impact on individuals. Genetics do. What we can do is

    Environment has almost no impact on individuals. Genetics do. What we can do is provide training to eliminate the maximum ignorance, error, bias, deceit.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 17:24:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670120286010654720

    Reply addressees: @MudKevin @Pepe65318510638

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670104507227987974