Curt Doolittle

Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • Autism as you refer to it is just the extreme male adult systematizing brain lau

    Autism as you refer to it is just the extreme male adult systematizing brain laundering all speech of loading, framing, obscuring, wishful and magical thinking, and the fictionalisms such that it sounds uncaringly legalistic, empirical, and scientific (and it is) rather than philosophical and theological which don’t launder themselves of loading, framing, and obscuring. But it is those emotions loadings and framings that are signals of alliance for your subconscoius. And I’m eradicating the ability to use that alliance signal and emotions to decieve you. As such you understand the truth and absence of deceit (or not)and understand what’s necessary for victory (or not). Measurments aren’t emotionally rewarding – they’re just true. 😉

    Reply addressees: @UBathys

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-21 17:12:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671566798376796174

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671562649635819520

  • LEARNING TO SPEAK IN PUBLIC –“To learn to speak distinctly, Demosthenes talked

    LEARNING TO SPEAK IN PUBLIC

    –“To learn to speak distinctly, Demosthenes talked with pebbles in his mouth and recited verses while running. To strengthen his voice, he spoke on the seashore over the roar of the waves.”–

    I prefer acting lessons, to public speaking lessons but whatever works.

    I learned far more from the study of shakespearian actors than from public speaking courses.

    Why? Most of us know our content (or we shouldn’t be speaking). When the problem is focusing on our diction, inflection, pace, volume, eye contact, body movement and gestures.

    I try to interact with the audience in person before any speech, so I develop a sense of ‘who am I talking to here’, and then take off my glasses when on stage, so that individual expressions in the audience don’t distract the autistic monster in my head that notices every detail. 😉

    Myself, I hate being the center of attention but I love ‘preaching’ to the audience. 😉

    Why Am I Writing This?

    Because we all know someone who has ability and talent but lacks the confidence in speech and skill in presentation that separates that individual for success and wealth. 😉

    Cheers

    PS: Ordinary acting (pretending) in the british school, not method acting (being) in the american school. And shakespearian stage acting (orating) rather than film acting (signaling).

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-21 16:35:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671557451269779456

  • Stereotypes are the most accurate measure in social science, and they are the mo

    Stereotypes are the most accurate measure in social science, and they are the most observably consistent human behavior.

    A biological fact like a statistic can be justified.
    Demonstrated behavior cannot.

    You’re showing your European ‘believe the science’ bias. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-21 14:49:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671530908850036738

    Reply addressees: @Glace15840573 @TheAutistocrat

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671529961578954753

  • It’s a personal affection. That’s different from rational judgement

    It’s a personal affection.
    That’s different from rational judgement.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-20 23:02:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671292360272093184

    Reply addressees: @Lord__Sousa @VladRomanyuk6

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671291415219822592

  • Well, they have A Class, they just don’t have Class. 😉 WHAT DOES ‘HAVING CLASS”

    Well, they have A Class, they just don’t have Class. 😉

    WHAT DOES ‘HAVING CLASS” MEAN?

    –“Having class is a phrase that refers to displaying good manners, being respectful and considerate of others, and having a certain level of sophistication and elegance in one’s behavior and appearance. It is often associated with a high level of social grace and refinement.”–

    What’s Missing:
    “The observable effects of behaving with responsibiilty, intention, and deliberiate decision, in demonstrating excellence within one’s capacities.”

    ie: It means you are no risk because you demonstrate exhaustive self regulation.

    Reply addressees: @ThruTheHayes @Hrafnskall @alsey_miller @PaulGottfried6 @ConceptualJames

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-20 20:32:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671254828205453312

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671253179038846978

  • MALE Mlitary -> Political -> Economic -> Social -> Interpersonal vs FEMALE Inter

    MALE
    Mlitary -> Political -> Economic -> Social -> Interpersonal
    vs
    FEMALE
    Interpersonal -> Social -> Political -> Economic -> Military

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-20 20:20:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671251776388104193

  • GREAT QUESTION –“Why not just say: “Slave morality is female morality, and mast

    GREAT QUESTION
    –“Why not just say: “Slave morality is female morality, and master slave is male morality, because these are terms for sex differences in instinctual responsibility for the commons.” Why use “indifferent from”?”–

    Because I was trained in economics and I work in epistemology and decidability, and a such “is” means equals or identical to, and that would be false.

    1) In economics, things are either marginally indifferent or marginally different, but almost never the same. Ergo, if you have 100 bags of flour to make it through the season, the first back is of lower subjective value than the last. If we are buying that same flour on the market in a commodities trade, then it’s possible they are marginally indifferent for all purposes. Despite that there are no such conditions because all flour, like all oil, is not identical in composition and quality. Ergo “identity is a property of the risks of inequality”.

    2) In decidability and in operational prose within decidability, we only use the word ‘is’ as ‘exists as x’ not as ‘is equal to or approximately equal to’, because the copula (the verb to be) is the means by which most sophistry, deceit, and philosophical nonsense is constructed. For that reason, we generally prohibit the use of the verb to-be in proofs of constructability (truth statements).

    So your question is the equivalent of why a mathematician uses specific symbols: it’s the same reason. Symbols in math, and operational language in testimony, are just a requirement of the grammar of disambiguation necessary for the use of each in the conduct of any measurement. Because ambiguity is the cause of logical falsehood.

    I hope that very nerdy explanation helps. 😉

    Reply addressees: @patriciamdavis @TheAutistocrat @PaulGottfried6 @ConceptualJames

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-20 13:47:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671152763709841410

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671149771233579012

  • FOUNDATIONS OF CONSCIOUSNESS SERIES (Added another video) A couple of years ago

    FOUNDATIONS OF CONSCIOUSNESS SERIES
    (Added another video)
    A couple of years ago I started producing a series of videos from the basic nervous system through to consciousness. I’d forgotten to publish this one on spaces and places (our sixth sense), and I’ve also recorded the Hippocampal region (where we create episodes and auto-associations, and predictions – where the magic happens).

    I’m not thrilled with the recording quality because I was in ‘constrained’ circumstances taking care of an elderly parent and recording in an auditorium. That said, I’ve written most of the content for everything through the circuits of the brain and yes, the experience of qualia and consciousness.

    My intention was to demystify (end the philosophical sophistry and pseudoscience) and explain with relative clarity how simple the brain, mind, and consciousness really is, despite its massive parallelism. And it really is quite simple. If it wasn’t, then flip-book animations wouldn’t work. 😉

    These videos were the original first course of the Foundations (The Work). But we found we needed to start with a much simpler starting place. So we switched to the discussion of how to present the content, and eventually (almost two years ago) decided to use the first principles, despite my original desire to start with the brain, the logic, then grammars, then the first principles (scientific laws).

    There are content creators today who are doing similar work even if less coherent in explaining the functions of the brain as an ‘operating system we experience’.

    But this will get the point across for those who are interested.

    I will most likely have to re-record the whole series at some point and have someone increase the production quality – when I have the time, which I rarely have.

    For now we are working on the first book and the constitution. From there we will have the foundations to work on the rest of the books and the lessons. for them. But again, we are effectively trying to produce a four year program in multiple disciplines with a tiny team and it’s not easy. Ask anyone who has produced college courseware for stem.

    https://t.co/yC9VUXDIU7

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-20 00:29:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670951856032366597

  • Q: “How Do We Avoid Nihilism?” By loving ourselves and taking on that responsibi

    Q: “How Do We Avoid Nihilism?”
    By loving ourselves and taking on that responsibility, we had attributed to god with confidence that we can, despite struggles, persevere and evolve into the gods we imagine. And make a garden of this planet and this universe, that if such a god…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-20 00:09:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670946950798012420

    Reply addressees: @KomondorDaugrin @TheAutistocrat

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670943708919877635

  • Q: DOES FREE WILL EXIST? Excellent example of a question that is intentionally o

    Q: DOES FREE WILL EXIST?

    Excellent example of a question that is intentionally or not misunderstood and misrepresented.

    Can we, and therefore are we responsible and accountable for our actions – particuarly in the sense of criminal, ethical, moral, seditious, and treasonous.…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-19 21:49:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670911704568406020

    Reply addressees: @tryanph

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670908605439287296