Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

SEX DIFFERENCES IN WORLD MODELING
–“True education is living with real people and understanding life’s struggles and the humanity we all share.”– Sue Ellen

Technically speaking, that’s not education (a generalization of empirical evidence) that’s called ‘idiosyncratic experience’, which means ‘unscientific’. And it’s unscientific, yet ‘believed’ partly because you, like all of us, select for interactions with people already aligned, but as a woman you empathize, suffer pervasive “false consensus bias”, and fail to systematize. Women’s minds (mostly) live in a world of empathy and justification to avoid conflict and responsibility for its settlement, and men live in a world of systemization and falsification so we take responsibility to handle and resolve conflict.

Anyone who has run businesses or invested around the world, worked in the state department, intel, or the military, can readily explain that one-on-one, chattering around the world, we find ourselves similar. But conversely, discussing any set of ideas, how to solve challenges, or listening to the complexity – and especially the lack of it – in native conversations around the world, rapidly demonstrates how alien we are from one another. And that alienation increases as class decreases.

In other words, you are the victim of naive bias.

And in general, this is why men don’t take women seriously outside of their sphere of interpersonal competency. And for what it’s worth, the expression of these female traits in the voting pattern is the source of today’s vast conflict that’s leading to secession and civil war.

Cheers

Reply addressees: @LucidPams @TheAutistocrat