Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • As far as I know Ashkenazi IQ is between 108 (likely) and 110 (less likely). Unt

    As far as I know Ashkenazi IQ is between 108 (likely) and 110 (less likely). Until the industrial revolution reversed darwinian reproduction, the IQ of anglos was probably similarly in the 100 to 115 range which is rather obvious from the evidence. (I spoke to Lynn about this quite a bit before he passed.)
    As far as I know, the Ashenazi distribution is wider, so there are more over 140 than Europeans, just as (as far as I know) the east asian distribution is narrower.
    As far as I know the Ashkenazi IQ advantage is by higher verbal intelligence. It is also declining because of outmarriage.
    If you follow me I explain in detail race differences in intelligence, and in particular the masculine european vs feminine Ashkenazi difference in intelligence – the only two groups that produce intellectuals of consequence for reasons I also explain elsewhere.
    There is, however an unstated value to feminine cognition applied to female preferred work – work capacity is higher because it’s less costly. Again, something I can explain elsewhere.
    We are in a period where verbal aculity, feminine cognition, and overproduction of the clerical class is an extraordinary value – though AI will likely end most of that rather quickly.
    The jews specialize in professions that are also biased in favor of feminine cognition, feminine conflict, and competition strategy – though I don’t want to go into that here. Those professions, like seduction, focus on baiting into hazard, under plausible deniability.
    They do not focus on production particularly of commons.

    Reply addressees: @Airmanareiks @UBERSOY1 @JeanReinfort @polygenic_ @KirkegaardEmil @jollyheretic


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-08 23:59:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1689063768787996673

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1689044364545159168

  • This data is nonsense. It’s using only 100k people and from non-random sources,

    This data is nonsense. It’s using only 100k people and from non-random sources, and I can’t even figure out if it was a web survey or something legitimate.
    AFAIK German IQ at 99 is reversing the flynn effect like most advanced countries by a combination of taxes that suppress…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-08 23:47:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1689060826097819649

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1689050152756031488

  • Hmmm… that’s not necessrily possible, becausewe don’t know which principles. A

    Hmmm… that’s not necessrily possible, becausewe don’t know which principles. And because humans choose their ingroup above all else. That ingroup might be ethnicity, or it might be cult, or it might be ideology, But when the chips are down, and we are at war, they choose kin – because that’s genes talking. So depends on if you mean choose nations with the best principles I’d go with that one, and if it means choose nations with the best principle that is natural law then of course, that’s the best of all. 😉

    Reply addressees: @univcompass


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-08 17:42:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688969044865519624

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688964133868212225

  • Hmmm… that’s not necessrily possible, becausewe don’t know which principles. A

    Hmmm… that’s not necessrily possible, becausewe don’t know which principles. And because humans choose their ingroup above all else. That ingroup might be ethnicity, or it might be cult, or it might be ideology, But when the chips are down, and we are at war, they choose kin – because that’s genes talking. So depends on if you mean choose nations with the best principles I’d go with that one, and if it means choose nations with the best principle that is natural law then of course, that’s the best of all. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-08 17:42:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688969044269928453

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688964133868212225

  • “SOFT WHITE UNDERBELLY’S” SOCIAL SCIENCE VIDEOS Yes. He’s using a similar method

    “SOFT WHITE UNDERBELLY’S” SOCIAL SCIENCE VIDEOS
    Yes. He’s using a similar method to leverage social media to conduct social science – and he’s non-manipulative in his work, which makes it good science. I use arguments to expose demonstrated behavior via langauge. He uses narrative testimony to do the same. it’s good science. And it’s especially good because it’s accessible science.

    In economics we call it ‘slumming’. Meaning living with drug dealers to learn the drug dealer economy and the behavioral economy under it.

    I prefer to call it ‘field research’. 😉

    Differences I can do mine from a laptop and a coffee shop. He has to find people on the street, convince them he’s sincere and not a threat, build trust, and arrange an interview without breaking that trust.

    Reply addressees: @dissidentwrath


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-08 14:47:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688924827179233281

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688840141266092032

  • I agree. But then as a teacher, part of my job is to lay out the field of opport

    I agree. But then as a teacher, part of my job is to lay out the field of opportunities so that people make the choice of their own volition of and own it. This turns out to be more effective at producing the best choice, than trying to persuade those that overvalue their own…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-08 14:29:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688920472485081088

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688892477296590848

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @RobOU812Rob @aldafa_ir @JaredAberach FIXING MARRIAGE – AND N

    RT @curtdoolittle: @RobOU812Rob @aldafa_ir @JaredAberach FIXING MARRIAGE – AND NAXALT VS DISTRIBUTIONS
    There is a common cognitive bias cal…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-08 14:25:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688919320259354624

  • FIXING MARRIAGE – AND NAXALT VS DISTRIBUTIONS There is a common cognitive bias c

    FIXING MARRIAGE – AND NAXALT VS DISTRIBUTIONS
    There is a common cognitive bias called NAXALT, predominant among women, but still present in some men, to fail to comprehend descriptions of the probability of a bell curve, by overweighting the outliers in a distribution. The reason? There is a deep and inescapable tendency of the feminine mind to seek magical thinking rather than self regulation, and the subjugation of impluse intuition and emotion to deliberate reason.

    Now, it’s almost impossible to know if you are going to be part of the nearly sixty percent of marriages that fail, and the additional ten to twenty percent that fail but do not divorce, in the hope that you might be part of the twenty percent that do not fail and do not end in divorce.

    The point being that the legal interference in marriage and mating has been catastrophic, and destroyed the institution – an institution whose original purpose was 1) to prevent retaliation cycles since men will kill over mates more so than for any other reason; 2) to protect the community from single motherhood and externalization of costs, or burden of the return of the mother and her offspring to her parents, by the community guarranteeing non-interference and punishment for interference; 3) third to maintain capital (property, assets, livestock) within the family and inheritance for it’s collective survival over time.

    So the point is that (a) we could follow Quebec and essentially abandon marriage. It works just fine. (b) We could restore marriage as an institution with the defenses and punishments. (c) We could create a three tiered market of 1) unattached cohabitation, 2) voluntary contractual partnerships consisting of reciprocal power of attorney and a required prenup that stated the division of assets upon termination of that power, and 3) restore the institution of marriage as one which parties internal to and external to the marriage are liable for interference in that marriage. And otherwise end all common property, alimony and child support.
    That would provide a set of options that reflect the incentives of the age of women’s economic and reproductive independence where single motherhood is not only common but the emergent norm.
    The solution to the marriage question is rather obvious. We could enact it with one legislative use of the pen. What I expect would happen is that couples would start with contractual partnerships

    Reply addressees: @RobOU812Rob @aldafa_ir @JaredAberach


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-08 14:25:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688919307865243649

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688899747795308550

  • RT @DegenRolf: As people get older, their personality becomes more mature, with

    RT @DegenRolf: As people get older, their personality becomes more mature, with Neuroticism decreasing, while Conscientiousness and Agreeab…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-08 05:23:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688783034319880193

  • RT @LukeWeinhagen: @EricMorganCoach I’ve always found Stefan Molynuex’s conceptu

    RT @LukeWeinhagen: @EricMorganCoach I’ve always found Stefan Molynuex’s conceptualization of love to be the most useful (though I’d swap th…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-08 03:59:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688761777859825664