Psychologizing is one of the feminine means of undermining by projection, under the presumption that the masculine is motivated by feminine emotion rather than systemizing reason.
Feminine GSRRM demonstrated once again. 😉
You do realize that you’re displaying female antisocial…
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-21 16:01:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693654546097000637
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693653154171179513
Tip: Natural selection isn’t opinion nor is the temporal division of cognitive labor between the polarity of the sexes, neotenic domestication as the direction of evolution, or genetic load resulting in sexes, classes, races.
The universe is a vast irradiated hosile wasteland. Evolution isnt caring, considerate, or merciful – but brutally utilitarian. And truth is merely self defense.
I don’t make the rules. I just prevent others from lying about and denying them. And I compose law to prevent that denying, deceit, lying, fraud and social construction of fraud so that mankind is defended agains nature and the wicked – those who rebel against truth with undermining, sedition, and treason.
ie: You.
Reply addressees: @MaxImp707
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-21 15:53:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693652573742313473
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693641971544248654
RT @DRolandAnderson: “The evolution of how our brains are constructed produces the behaviors that we demonstrate.”
@curtdoolittle
Biltong…
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-21 03:47:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693469843159200168
Already done: Murray’s book: Human Accomplishent
my work contains the equivalent explanation of the evolution of sedition, deception, lying and denying.
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-20 21:03:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693368273981554793
Reply addressees: @TabbyTeamster
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693363431208845756
no. tests were dumbed down into verbal to limit sex differences, and no matter what men dominate the extremes. Ther are no females in the Hilbert range, and the Iq curve for autists is inverted, with autism the extreme male brain. Instead the sexes divide cognitive labor of…
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-20 19:51:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693350097159860689
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693323339626905995
Well I understand it’s a symptom, even though the entire spectrum that’s the cause, is the result of feminine cognition on one hand and the remnanats of the first feminine destruction of european civilization.
I hardly need spoon feeding. But you’re assuming whatever frame you’re…
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-20 00:16:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693054484983812444
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693027558634222050
Hard to be picky when your job is unification of the sciences.
Anyway, as far as I know, I’m one of the leading researchers in sex differences in cognition, and one of the only, if not the only, active in sex differences in lying. Which is why you are about as complicated to me as a three-year-old denying she ate the cookie. In other words, you’re demonstrating, rather quickly, dark triad, female antisocial behavior, and feminine methods of lying and denying but attempting undermining in lieu of argument. The primary determinants of the female methods of lying are low verbal intelligence, and (of course) being female, or having a female temperament (personality), and demonstrating dark triad behavioral traits.
Now you wouldn’t think computational linguistics would be able to achieve these insights before last November, but now that we have AI’s demonstrating it every single day by the millions it’s more obvious and I have less effort to expend in explaining it to the wicked, and ignorant.
Cheers.
Reply addressees: @Redheadarts @shirleyhelliwe1 @BladeoftheS
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-19 20:52:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693003014380859392
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1692992066140164201
Well, again, i’m not sure that’s true. The eugenics movement sought to use the same criteria we used in domeisticating all otehr animals: physical fitness, mental fitness, demonstrated by the ability for self sufficiency, and ability for peaceful cooperation with others. Pretty…
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-19 14:12:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1692902477497041049
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1692835097949442208
It is possible that you don’t share Aurelius’ world view becaues you don’t bear any meaningful responsibilities for others at any scale that would make such insights relevant to you – though in a democracy, cognizance of that relevance in matters of policy would be to the benefit…
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-19 14:02:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1692899890584514753
Reply addressees: @day_sunflowers @Zalaventurero @LengdungT @Culture_Crit
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1692875820795097501
Not an argument. High probability of female cognitive deficit in the conflationg of and reversal of approval and truth.
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-19 13:59:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1692899153171390634
Reply addressees: @Redheadarts @shirleyhelliwe1 @BladeoftheS
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1692880071227314244