Genetics > Vitamin D deficiency > Asthma > Fungal vulnerability.
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-24 22:05:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694833451956859319
Reply addressees: @EricMorganCoach @Rasterdingus
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694811786824868138
—“…men are more likely to live in a fantasy DESPITE the fact that a sizeable number of men, like a sizeable number of women, believe in the fanciful notion that politicians are our “public servants “….even when reality shows this is clearly not the case?”— @joanlarma
That’s contrary to all historical evidence. In fact the percentage of women who vote for a candidate on likability is astounding, and combination with voting on looks, is terrifying. In fact we would never have elected a left leaning president without women voters. In large part, women are low information voters who are easily manipulated and bias bias in favor of exporting responsibility onto men. Worse, for every male conspiracy theorist, there are two female oppreseion theorists. The tipping point is securely married with three or more children, more if christian, more if ethnically european.
But in support of half of your observation, there is no correlation with public want and political provision at all. In general the state is self interested, the country is too big and diverse for the centalization of social policy, the financial system’s dominance in economy and politics at the expense of social cohesion, and the war on the middle class to resist it all – because they are the only responsible class – combined with the federal government’s geostrategic role highly skews its behavior in favor of peers and yes against the people. Meanwhile the people would follow europe into suicidal sependency if given the opportunity..
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-24 18:44:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694782650941104128
–“Men live in reality but like visiting fantasy. Women live in fantasy and hate living in reality”—
Why? Actions, accountability, loyalty, responsibility and capitalization vs words, unaccountability, temporary devotion, irresponsibility and hyperconsumption.
Why? Female Demand, Male Supply, behavioral economics in everything.
Feminism is undoing thousands of years of western pedestaling of women, tolerance for female antisocial behavior, and the resulting possibilty for compromise between the sexes in the production of families that produce intertemporal security.
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-24 16:48:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694753619097145352
–“Men live in reality but like visiting fantasy. Women live in fantasy and hate living in reality”—
Why? Actions, accountability, loyalty, responsibility and capitalization vs words, unaccountability, temporary devotion, irresponsibility and hyperconsumption.
Feminism is undoing thousands of years of western pedestaling of women, tolerance for female antisocial behavior, and the resulting possibilty for compromise between the sexes in the production of families that produce intertemporal security.
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-24 16:48:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694753218583056387
–“Men live in reality but like visiting fantasy. Women live in fantasy and hate living in reality”—
Why? Actions, accountability, loyalty, and responsibility and capitalization vs words, unaccountability, temporary devotion, irresponsibility and hyperconsumption.
Feminism is undoing thousands of years of western pedestaling of women, tolerance for female antisocial behavior, and the resulting possibilty for compromise between the sexes in the production of families that produce intertemporal security.
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-24 16:48:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694747801240940544
WHY THE ENEMY CREATES IDENTITY CONFLICT
–“Everybody who comes into clinical session whose reasonably troubled has an identity problem.”– Jordan B Peterson
There is a much deeper implication to Peterson’s insight than is apparent. In fact, he’s identifying the cause of the macro problem.
Our work: humans require standards of measurement that together produce a network of decidability that produces minfulness, confidence, by the ability to organize feelings, intuitions, impulses, reason, experience, and evidence, and the ability to produce continously positive feedback by success in internal, social, economic, and political environment – by alleviating the confusion, mindlessess, disorientation, and disassociation caused by neuroticism in the absence of that capacity for self regulation. Without that mindfulness we will latch onto some impluse that we feel we DO understand and essentially develop addictions the the false successful feedback of control over life by satisfying that impluse no matter how odd (or base) that it is.
This is why the enemy are fomenting ‘identities’ so that we are baited into the hazard of being esily manipulated by verbal and imaginary social constructions, and as a consequence disconnecdting our behavior from reality, and couasing the vast hormful consequences of both the resulting addiction, the social economic and political consequences, and the empowerment of sick, evil, people into continous manipulation, deception and authoritarianism – by the simple act of destroying reality as a standard of measurement by which we self-organize our behavior, cooperation, success, and evolution.
No more ‘drugs of words’. No more lies. No more social constructions of falsehoods that bait people into the hazard of dysfunction, dysgenia, and decline.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-24 15:33:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694734752614416384
RT @BronskiJoseph: Do spouses have more similar IQs than expected? The research suggests that the answer is yes. One study found that the cā¦
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-24 14:30:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694718714669920632
RT @robinhanson: Why is the cultural prestige/influence of music 10x that of video games, if game industry is 10x larger?
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-24 14:15:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694715108600209654
Correct. Most people are bots, participating in a “open conspiracy of common interest (public)” and not a “closed conspiracy of intent (secret)”, or open conspiracies of intent (not secret).
However there are conspiracies such as the intentional conspiracy to “March through and destroy the institutions of cultural production of western civilization and its demand for individual responsibility” and the resulting spread of that open conspiracy of intent into “open conspiracies of common interest”.
Reply addressees: @bryanbrey @AshaLogos
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-23 20:29:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694446698578210816
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694445550098096192
Intersexual Conflict: Overstating the case to make the case?
–“There is no burden of performance on female competence, which is why women get away with saying ****** ****, which is why no one gives a **** what y’all think.”– F&F Miami August 2, 2023 (ouch.)
(Note that F&F has been recently demonetized by YT. There is an organized effort to purge social media prior to the election cycle, just as there was leading up to the last, and after, as I’d warned. Somehow the organization (conspiracy) of attempts to silence public debate has not ended up in the courts as a class action. I assume this legal correction will occur in the next two to five years.)
Though, AFAIK, this criticism by F&F is largely directed at younger women. And so I think all of this overstates the case, and it’s only the present young generations are most devoid of competence and especially responsibility.
In the scientific literature, the phrase is “Both men and women coddle women”. And the less sanitized version is “Men don’t take women outside their sphere of responsibility seriously”.
Why do we behave this way? Well, women (least when fertile) have intrinsic value, but men must demonstrate value. The burden of performance is entirely male. Although it doesn’t tell us why either sex continues to demonstrate this behavior.
My understanding both from the literature and from running large organizations is that neither sex takes women’s speech seriously outside of their direct sphere of control. Or, more generally, we tend to listen carefully to women on the empirical (what they observe) and to men on the theoretical (what they predict).
The same is true in all areas of performance: we see smart women in the empirical and practical but the theoretical and innovative is entirely the domain of men. Why? verbal, pictoral, empathizing, and juggling many, vs spatial-temporal, systematizing, and predicting fields of outcomes. That’s the cognitive difference between the sexes and it’s obvious in the organization of neural connectivity in our brains.
But:
Women have been able to capture the majority of white-collar clerical jobs and are financially secure at a younger age than their male counterparts. So the intersexual market asymmetry is profound.
IMO many to the majority of these jobs are about to vaporize, because these are the next layer of jobs to be replaced by technology. While repatriation of industry, beginning with strategic and increasing to most, will rebalance this sex difference over the next decade.
However, at present rates of marriage and reproduction that means that there will be no workers to pay for their retirement, health care, or even keep prices down.
Destroying the family wasn’t a very good idea. š
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-23 04:01:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1694198184296235008