Curt Doolittle

Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • “The Natural Law Institute finds the distinction in the cognition of time betwee

    –“The Natural Law Institute finds the distinction in the cognition of time between the masculine psyche and the feminine psyche to be axiomatic in the determination of human behavior.”– Dr Brad

    Correct.

    Sex Differences in Cognition
    Our findings are that all differences in cognition valuation and expression, other than those of genetic load or in-utero development, are caused by sex differences in the organization of the brain for the purpose of dividing the labor of the sexes into specializing in opposite time frames.

    Why? Physics and Ternary Logic of the Universe.
    Think of humans evolving from fast male sperm predator, and slow female egg prey if you want a humorous analogy to help you remember. But while easy to remember and somewhat humorous, the analogy is quite accuratly the causality. Explaining why this division of labor exists produces an origin of sex differences in physics and combined with differences in responsibility and status seeking provides the three causal properties that define human differences in behavior. Nature likes ternary logic which is something we explore elsewhere if you want to twist your brain inside out on yet another issue. 😉

    Methodology
    Though our work is entirely based on the intersection between neuroscience – particularly over the past decade, and linguistic analysis (from computational linguistics) our methodology uses similar techniques to intelligence, personality, moral bias, and psychological bias testing, but we do so by constructing expression from the causalty of the underlying organization of the brain (neurology) instead of deduction from from language alone. (Which has plagued psychology since its origin.)

    I hope this helped.
    Hugs and such

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @WerrellBradley @GimmeSuede @SamMcGeeHall1

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-15 15:51:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702711820732051456

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702707895690010818

  • That’s a common error comparing two population sizes Liberals are to left of cen

    That’s a common error comparing two population sizes
    Liberals are to left of center as libertarians are to right of center. libertarians are smarter than liberals. Republicans are smarter than democrats. And education credentials are an inverted proxy for intelligence given the vast number of women with nonsense degrees who are the dimmest pool in the academy and the reason for degree asymmetry in the sexes. You make less money with many of those degrees that if you didn’t go to college.

    We’ve known this since this nonsense emerged in the early nineties. But it’s a bit of nonsense statistics justifying motivated reasoning, but a meme we can’t seem to suppress.

    Although we have settled the mental illness issue as heavily biased to liberals given it’s a feminine moral disposition with attendant neuroticism.

    Reply addressees: @monitoringbias

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-15 13:30:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702676326404993024

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702465790279131379

  • No. I’m talking about differences in brain development, structure, and organizat

    No. I’m talking about differences in brain development, structure, and organization between the lateral in-time empathizing, pictorial, and verbal bias vs the longitudinal over time systematizing, modeling, and symbolic bias. Nature evolved us to divide cognitive labor between…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-15 13:13:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702671984507638261

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702580897482985548

  • Meaningful differences in Intelligence discussed in response to why I don’t play

    Meaningful differences in Intelligence discussed in response to why I don’t play IQ phallus comparison games so much as criticize presumptions of the male tendency to assert opinions only possible or claims that it’s meaninglessness in demonstration of its absence. 😉 https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1702668304865746993

  • I don’t because it leads to nonsense signals from the worst sort. Truth is that

    I don’t because it leads to nonsense signals from the worst sort. Truth is that as you approach 140s you’re facile enough to accomplish anything with consistent effort over long periods of time. And as we approach 160 we are not sure what we are testing that’s meaningful in outcomes. There are plenty of 170s who are unstable and work as cashiers at seven eleven so to speak. Or like the recent millenniums prize winner who are recluses and otherwise invisible. These are, at some point, statistically interesting in comparing outliers’ differences in performance in time, and less about what they accomplish with it. Whereas under 140 there appear to be limits to what people accomplish in every standard deviation – though it varies quite a bit by personality within each standard deviation between people.

    Conversely, it absolutely astonishes and horrifies me how non linearly logical ability crashes below the mid 90s. Meaning Democratic government with open unregulated participation without demonstrated real world achievement in middle class responsibilities is never going to accomplish anything but burning accumulated social, economic and political capital.

    As anyone who studies my work will eventually discover, I have more than enough to accomplish very difficult ambitions over time. But I also know it’s not enough to compete with the minds I mentioned in the previous post within time. And because of personality traits, I lack the desire or need for approval sufficient to submit to relative economic poverty, management of my learning by others, and academic politics, so I work best independently as I wish to and usually in competition with my business interests, despite that I build companies as social science experiments.

    My particular talent is a very subtle autistic pattern recognition across a very lucky long term memory. But unlike the outlier mathematicians I’ve mentioned, my attention regulation and resulting working memory differences, as well as unwillingness to work endlessly with puzzles (math etc) dependent on extraordinary working memory, instead of real world problems that are dependent upon extraordinary associative memory rather than working memory, led me to my work within my limits, which like my memory led to a very broad achievement in epistemology, logics, and behavioral science instead of a narrow technical innovation in the more challenging subject of math.

    I hope this helps. I find this explanation is most useful for others.

    Reply addressees: @ezra_tezra @KirkegaardEmil

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-15 12:58:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702668304656056320

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702581145097884159

  • Mark The current female dominance of clerical, interpersonal, and administrative

    Mark
    The current female dominance of clerical, interpersonal, and administrative work (which they are frankly better suited for than most, but not all men) have been made possible by the advent of the computational revolution.

    They are also about to be replaced like labor was by robotic information.

    Meanwhile we are re-industrializing faster than we industrialized during the war era, and our fundamental problem mis that we have no equivalent to German education, training, and apprenticeship that will help our male labor master the relative difficulty of computer aided production

    Reply addressees: @toodarkmark

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-15 01:16:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702491507071090688

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702400597201187072

  • Sexual Selection(internal focus) vs Natural Selection(External focus) I watch wo

    Sexual Selection(internal focus) vs Natural Selection(External focus)

    I watch women, who are commonly the victims of loss of situational awareness given female bias to empathizing (or shopping) in time vs male bias to environment and systematizing over time, that human interaction by display and speech is the greatest concentration of relaxed stimulation humans can experience, frequently let children, themselves, or others be victims of hazard

    If you study human suggestion, manipulation, coercion, deceit, lying, fraud, denial, undermining and sedition for a bit, you rapidly realize that people are doing the same thing to one another in status, social, economic, and political terms constantly, and that the military just teaches it as standard practice.

    Not that I recommend it. My career feels a bit like a Roman sewer cleaner for human behavior, and there are better ways to make a living that help you preserve your optimism – assuming you have some to start with 😉

    Hugs.

    PS: Jayman rocks. 😉

    Reply addressees: @JayMan471

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-15 01:13:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702490717900173313

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702469701245210986

  • RT @restoreorderusa: The Connection Between Testosterone and “Racist” Beliefs Sc

    RT @restoreorderusa: The Connection Between Testosterone and “Racist” Beliefs

    Scientists at the University of Delaware found that men with…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-14 07:33:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702224074993217777

  • Great response. Remaining objection: I’m looking for the IQ as whether it’s meas

    Great response. Remaining objection: I’m looking for the IQ as whether it’s measured or proxied by degree. If it’s the latter it’s meaningless. (And curious about the personality data method of collection).
    Thanks if your patient and kind enough to reply,.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-14 03:07:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702157003798298626

    Reply addressees: @cremieuxrecueil

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702155696442126595

  • Vaccination = Intelligence? Not likely intelligence (whatsoever). Luxury Beliefs

    Vaccination = Intelligence?
    Not likely intelligence (whatsoever).
    Luxury Beliefs. Virtue Signaling. Close quarters white collar employment. Female density in white collar employment. False proxy of degree for intelligence. (The big hole in most of this nonsense.) Institutional pressure. Insurance fears.

    Correlation is rarely causation.
    Most first order correlations do not expose the distribution of incentives.
    This is one of them.

    The statistic we DO know is that empathizing (feminine) and systematizing (masculine) plus neuroticsm and feelings of helplessness in unstable classes produce expected distributions in the poplation not subject to institutional pressures.

    Unfortunately I had to make the decision of whether to continue to debunk bad social science, and in particular economics, or work on legal reform that would fix it less directly but fix the problem more broadly.

    But any behavioral economist should have been able to enumerate the various and rather obvious causal distributions that would need to be acounted for but are clearly absent in the source data – because the outcome was desired by not including it.

    You shoujld have seen what I found out working with climate scientists and the ‘global warming’ institutions back in 09.

    Reply addressees: @cremieuxrecueil

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-14 03:00:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702155224138252288

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702132016831971365