I agree. Now, given that you understand this, because you’re one of the ten percent of thinkers, how do we help more women ‘move along the path’ without saying ‘wimmensz iz badd’? because I’m sure not keen on that message.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-28 16:45:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707436407520706852
Reply addressees: @mishf1sh
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707409458077524366
Um. No. I’m not saying that.
I’m saying that our genes and our cultures affect our thinking in predictable ways. And that the interesting thing about our two cultures, given that there are only three possible founding institutions for a civilization: Religion, State, and Law – we are the only two that chose law as our primary or secondary institution. And that this was a bit of luck since law is the optimum primary institution – and all other civs either failed at it, or produced commands instead of law.
The other is that i was one of the first people to ‘draw those circles’ and on Quora it’s still one of the most popular posts I’ve made. And the individual that claimed the ashkeanzi are within the southern European instead of the cross-bar of the “A” between european and semitic-african, is because the Ashkenazi are a hybridization of Jewish males and European females.
In other words, no the ashkenzim are not ‘white’ becuase they are not genetically white, and do not ‘think’ in european (masculine) terms.
However, at the rate of outbreeding at least in the USA it’s not going to matter at all. The same is true for Asians. The rate of their outbreeding is going to mean they disappear rather quickly.
I’m as worried as Bebe about Israel’s demographics. Because it’s been obvious for a very long time, and ideas are only as good as the brains that hold them.
I”m not anti=anybody. My work is designed to help us all prosper.
Reply addressees: @deportriggers @AviBittMD
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-28 08:18:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707308913081679872
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707289468552777764
Non-college-educated whites are not insulated from either the physical world, diverse populations, individual responsibility or market forces. They are also oddly better informed. And they are unable to get away with false virtue signaling and so less able to preserve illusions. They are also the only population that is reproducing at above replacement level.
Issue: college education for the majority of women does not convey any competency but grants access to clerical work that does not require physical labor. It also means that these women, by and large, have meaningless degrees, and more than a few of these degrees pay less than no education at all. Teachers, for example, are from the bottom 15 percent of their classes, are one of the two professions most likely to engage in infidelity (nurses being the other), and in keeping with female averages, about 30% are burdened with some sort of mental illness.
I’ve done the work on these issues, and here is the truth:
Republicans are smarter than Democrats.
Democrats are waaaaay more criminal than Republicans
Liberals are smarter than conservatives (ask why? #’s)
libertarians are the smartest of all.
Why these are true is rather obvious given the size of the different populations that identify by these terms.
The problem with most of the data is that authors are using degrees as a proxy for IQ, instead of IQ tests and SAT scores by degree. This is a good way to fool the (ignorant) population but … not people who know better.
Reply addressees: @RyanGirdusky @AnnCoulter
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-28 05:48:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707271133739761665
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707226421171474435
Avi,
I’ve done extensive work on the issue and the rabbinical claim that ashkenazim ‘think differently’ is true. It’s simple in that It’s a feminine cognitive bias, and is evident in everything from speech patterns, to word choices, to social norms, to professions, to the method of conflict, to the tendency to fictionalize and engage in social construction. It even shows up in antisocial behavior, criminal behavior, and most especially in lying. Personally I’ve found it fascinating. Because it explains why so many of the behavioral pseudosciences have been produced by ashkenazim – and even the method of argument across Rez, Kelsen, Dworkin and Hart: storytelling and seduction and seeking agreement, instead of testimony and truth upon which we can then discover agreement or not. Even the rather odd way that Einstein solved relativity with pictures instead of models, and why he caused the failure of physics in the mid 20th by re-platonizing physics and mathematics. And why Bohr, avoiding physics by claiming ‘just calculate’. Or why Freud, Marx, Boaz, and worse the frankfurt school – just literally made it all up. Or why Zinn and Harrari just fabricate stories that people want to believe. I mean, can we fix this? Sure. But it’s similar to the problem we’re seeing with women in education, academy, industry, and most importantly voting. Where women are the vehicle for face before truth, and expanding irresponsibilty. It’s quite fascinating. It’s just going to take a bit of legislation and a lot of education.
The other interesting observation is that the jewish recovery and restoration of jewish law, was in rsponse to the dominance of european law. And it turns out that the masculine and feminine traditions combined with our mutual use of law, is what produced our mutual advantages – even if, the jews could never develop a stable durable state, so focused on family and socialization, where europeans focused on politics and technology.
Reply addressees: @AviBittMD
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-28 04:59:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707258737809825792
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707231106498433213
So yes, IQ is a measure of (g) which is a synthesis of verbal(feminine bias) vs spatial(masculine bias) and it’s literally a measure of neural adaptivity. It’s really not much more than the friction or lack of it in neural connectivity.
The science is a little confusing, but it appears that even in twins it can vary quite a bit. The reason being that neural formation in utero is only probabalistic, and the first two years after birth continue the trend. So even in identical twins you can have quite a bit of variation just because they shared a womb with some variations.
Reply addressees: @akingoffools
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-28 04:47:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707255625112080384
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707253216419950719
Please accept that I understand these things – in great depth. And that in general we also measure variation between years and over years. And we measure groups, and compare groups, with ‘whites’ being the measure of 100 and others varying from it. So while whites are remaining similar, well, similar enough, despite our deep losses from the industrial revolution, the collective measure of the USA will drop relatie to the white average. So, what we are seeing is the USA getting dumber and the numbers I stated really happening.
Keep in mind that under 105, it gets bad really fast. Above 115 it gets better a bit at a time. And we are already having a problem finding labor that can operate high tech machines.
Reply addressees: @akingoffools
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-28 04:44:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707254819386245120
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707253216419950719
AS US IQ DECLINES: WORTH REGULAR REPOSTING
The percent of the population that is all but unemployeable was 16%. It is heading to 25% as immigration increases, reproductive asymmetry remains, and as a result IQ decreases.
What are we going to do with a modern economy where a quarter of the population is unemployable? What are we going to do with the clerical white collar workers (women) that have expanded since the computer revolution in the 1980s. The laborers were hurt by mechanization, and the white collar workers who shuffle information are going to be hurt by AI. What if we can’t find anything that’s more than subsistence level for more than a quarter, to maybe a third of the population?
https://t.co/HbRon4CZpY
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-28 01:49:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707210768922378240
(Women can do it if we make it socially acceptable (necessary) for them to do it. I think. I think. There are already bout 10% who can. It’s got to be possible for more than that.)
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-28 01:33:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707206744361836656
Reply addressees: @FeminaStudiosa
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707205412070547952
I do true. It’s a man thing apparently. 😉 Data is its white wealthy women who are neurotic causing the woke suppression in academia, and it’s single women and moreso women without children that are skewing the voting left.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-28 01:08:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707200534036254949
Reply addressees: @justinmchase @afrointernet @schizarella
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707199548857180671
Yes. But again. The problem is women. It’s just women. The problem isn’t the west, or our men, it’s just women. So knowing that, what do we do?
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-28 00:39:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707193174077178264
Reply addressees: @6745i473
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707191383390401002