BTW: Social media is not a meaningful sample of the population. in fact is is most likely the people who talk promote, advocate, whine or complain but actually DO nothing whatsoever.
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-15 02:41:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713384512279708105
Reply addressees: @sqpatrick77 @radiofreenw
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713380587732414859
CARL
We haven’t ever spoken but the west is only having one crisis and that’s the failure to constrain female antisocial, antipolitical behavior whether it is from a group of foriegn elites that make use of the feminine method of warfare, or the domestic women who fall for it, embrace it, spread it, becuase it’s sensible to them. In the USA there would never have been any of these results if women hadn’t been given the vote. I hate that this is true. But it is. And so the claims are civilization is lost are only as true as our willingness not to impose laws that limit the continous undermining of female intution which is the polar opposite of man: hiding behind moral pretense for what is really nothing more than the evasion of responsibility for the commons, because of the conflict and risk of bearing that responsibility.
Reply addressees: @Sargon_of_Akkad
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-15 02:38:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713383790658064385
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713371848296087847
RT @WalterIII: Feminine hyperconsumption is a good, its the general state of animals in nature, and focused on the present moment in time.…
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-15 02:33:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713382456642920614
Basically, yes. Though, I don’t like the term patriarchal, but it just means ‘responsibility’ and while very few women are eithr psychologically or physically willing and able, a majority of men are willing to bear the stress and risk of conflict in defense of the private and…
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-15 01:01:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713359372032598423
Reply addressees: @edlir__ @LadyYlva
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713356377312170494
This makes sense:
–“The essay implies that females exploit the males, and ends with “let’s change laws” to inhibit such exploitation”–
The second doesn’t (yet)
The origin of education is the catholic church’s foundation of the monastic schools, church schools, and academies.
This spread to the church’s town schools where boys 7-14 were taught basics and eventually arithmetic.
Education for the poor was mandated by the Church in 1179 decreeing that every cathedral must assign a master to teach boys too poor to pay the regular fee.
With few exceptions, priests and brothers taught locally, and their salaries were frequently subsidized by towns. Private, independent schools reappeared in medieval Europe during this time, but they, too, were religious in nature and mission
Johannes Herbart developed a system of pedagogy widely used in German-speaking areas. Mass compulsory schooling started in Prussia c1800 to “produce more soldiers and more obedient citizens”
In the late 19th century, most of West, Central, and parts of East Europe began to provide elementary education in reading, writing, and arithmetic, partly because politicians believed that education was needed for orderly political behavior.
What I suspect you are imagining is the german development of kindergarten in the lat 19th century because the industrial revolution had made possible women working outside the home.
Education’s always been a male thing.
It’s not a wonder that woman are destroying it.
Reply addressees: @testererr
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 20:11:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713286338038919168
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713281127039819963
No. I’m observing the various methods by which religious substitutes are being sought in the population, and comparing them to the behavioral science that creates the demand for such things – it’s just mindfulness. And comparing them to the history of different models whether confucian philosophy, stoicism and epicurianism, buddhist pre-religious philosophy, shintoism with Buddhist trappings, hindu mythology as religion and widom literature, the abrahamic sequence of slave revolt religinos, and of course the african versions of pentacostalism, and finally african magical religion.
Reply addressees: @chucktowngent @SwornInvictus
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 18:55:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713267262902173696
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713263878665077063
It means there is a demographic pyramid of age groups, and that if we survey school children today, that it will still take sixty to eighty years for their statistics to work through the population.
If you do research in this field they tell you to ignore israel, lebanon and one…
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 18:17:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713257730511716409
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713194645801369946
If you realize that the semitic behavior is just feminine cognition, and you realize that the cognitively feminine (mostly women but some immature or broken men too), then you realize it’s just genes talking and that we have to implement laws to constrain their behaivor because their instincts are not just bad but catastrophic, and for all intents and purposes accidentally evil. The only reason you have to blame people is once they know the answer, once we’ve imposed the law, and then they resist it.
Reply addressees: @P1nKAPanther
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 18:13:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713256641708056577
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713235205031416007
YES DUGIN’S A CRACKPOT – BUT HE HAS ONE POINT WORTH GRASPING: WOMEN ARE MAKING THE WEST LOSE.
Of course Dugin’s is a crackpot. However my point is that even a crackpot gets something right once in a while:
I use every possible example I can, to explain that the world regjection of the west is primarily due to the introgression of women into economy and polity, and jewish elites providing the marxist sequence of justifications for female antisocial behavior: Neo-Marxism(cultural marxism), Postmodernism (truth marxism), Anti-Male Feminism (Female Marxism), Woke (Race Marxism), providing women a false pretense of victimhood imposed by white men, when it’s the laws of the universe, laws of nature, and laws of the genetic division of cognition, valuation, labor, and advocacy, between teh sexes, classes, civilizations, and races. And the capture of our education, our academy, our bureaucracy, and our government by jews and women advancing the female strategy of seditious undermining to getnerate conflict under the pretense of oppression, when in fact women are always and everywhere hyperconsumers, evading responsibilty for both private and common, and in the process forming the army that is destroying our civilization from within – the same way women destroyed the Roman civilizatoin from within using thhe false promises of christianity as a women’s and slaves’ revolt against aristocratic meritocratic western civilization. So jews, (muslims) and women are bringing in another dark age if we don’t stop the destruction they’ve brought about, and the world conflict they’ve brought about through the export of their natural immorality and deviancy to the rest of the world as a virtue rather than a crime.
Reply addressees: @Nataraj4308
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 17:45:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713249621751783424
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713222944178995289
Can We Reform Women And Restore Our Civilization?
Women aren’t consciousof their antisocial behavior as unethical, immoral, and criminial evasion of responsibility for the commons. I’ve done the work: we can clearly implement the law prohibiting their behaviors by either sex and in doing so train the entire population back ito a high trust society.
The problem is, without this articulation of the cause, the behavior, and the limits on the behavior, and without the reinforcement of the law, women will not constrain one another to prosocial behavior,and will continue to manufacture false oppression narratives that they hide behind to excuse their antisocial behavior – which always and everywhere is nothing but the evasion of responsibility for the commons, which, in the end, is what citizenship consists of.
If you can’t defend the commons, by taking responsibilty for defending the commons, including by display word and deed, despite the emotional, social, and physical risk, then you can’t have access to citizenship because that’s what citizenship means: responsibility.
You can have juridical defense (negativa) but you can’t have political or legislative influence(positiva).
Reply addressees: @Agkistrodon14
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 17:36:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713247362179629056
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713234637126836240