Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • AN HOMAGE: THE END OF LOVE OF THE EXPERIENCING OF DRIVING? Most people buy exoti

    AN HOMAGE: THE END OF LOVE OF THE EXPERIENCING OF DRIVING?

    Most people buy exotics entirely for signaling purposes. They certainly do not buy them for utilitarian transportation. But for some minority of owners, the pleasure of driving something terribly powerful, elegant to look at, visceral to command, and mechanically uncompromising is a pleasure in itself.

    In an era of commuting, where we often seek to replicate our living rooms in order to reduce the tedium of repetitive driving, or where we augment that utilitarian purpose with consumer status signaling, the pure pleasure of the experience of driving the sports car or the experience of adventure from driving the grand touring car is often forgotten.

    We have few places where we can experiment with our sports cars without fear of prosecution, and the world has shrunk so much and become so densely populated, and our roadways so utilitarian, that the grand touring experience has become one of selecting from a set of fixe drives through aging natural amusement parks rather than a means of exploring the world around us, and loving the experience of it.

    For many, the signaling that comes from driving a Ferrari is a net benefit. THey attract attention. For some of us, they attract too much attention. It’s painful to come back to your car after ten minutes and find a dent in the hood and fresh droplets of pistachio ice cream on it, because someone who does not know better sat on the car as a photo opportunity.

    For that reason, the Porsche truly is the best brand with which to experience the world. They are uncompromising machines. They are durable machines. They’re beautiful machines. And they’re thrilling to drive. And you don’t have to leave them with a hotel valet. You can leave them in a parking lot without worrying that they’ll attract the attention of the impulsive if you want to have an espresso while sitting in the sunshine, people-watching at a cafe.

    Much of the world that was explorable with postwar British sports cars is gone. The developed world is too highly populated, and human culture no longer functions in open air of markets and city streets. That postwar exploratory experience today is better found with a Jeep or Land Rover in the developing world. Outside of Los Angeles, the postwar baby boom car culture – cruising – as a means of socializing, is not only impossible but open to prosecution, because it is indistinguishable from criminal surveillance by gangs, or inebriated risk taking by the young. To some degree urban foot traffic in europe is the only way to have that social experience. Online socialization hardly suffices. But the thrill of driving is reserved tot hose people who participate in celebratory rallies like the Gold Rush or Gumball rallies. Rare events that are expensive and orchestrated, not recreational exploratory opportunities to gain insights into and compassion for, your fellow man.

    Driving is an expresson of freedom. A gift of modernity: our ability to move outside of our twenty mile radius of possible life experience with ease. A way of touching more humanity that we could without it. It was a privilege. A reflection of a time of rapid change. And what little is left for us, is best experienced not with an exotic which is the focus of your attention, but by a little sports car, where humanity, despite it’s materialistic homogeneity. is the focus of your attention.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-04-06 13:07:00 UTC

  • Do We Have Occasion To Verbally Criticize The Feckless?

    Murray states:

    we must change the language that we use whenever the topic of feckless men comes up. Don’t call them “demoralized.” Call them whatever derogatory word you prefer. Equally important: Start treating the men who aren’t feckless with respect. Recognize that the guy who works on your lawn every week is morally superior in this regard to your neighbor’s college-educated son who won’t take a “demeaning” job. Be willing to say so.

    This shouldn’t be such a hard thing to do. Most of us already believe that one of life’s central moral obligations is to be a productive adult. The cultural shift that I advocate doesn’t demand that we change our minds about anything; we just need to drop our nonjudgmentalism.

    It is condescending to treat people who have less education or money as less morally accountable than we are. We should stop making excuses for them that we wouldn’t make for ourselves. Respect those who deserve respect, and look down on those who deserve looking down on.

    via Why economics can’t explain our cultural divide – Society and Culture – AEI.

    I understand that we can use this approach in the various media. But as a people who have also become spatially independent and therefore socially isolationist, and who converse with little more than our televisions while watching shows that reinforce our sentiments, in an society where politics rewards polarity, in an economy that must desperately seek the favor of consumers and can brook no negative feedback, where the few people with whom we share no sentimental differences, then there remains an interesting question: In what circumstance may we provide this feedback? Really.

  • END OF THE SUCCESS GAP? “The success gap for women age 40-44 declined significan

    http://www.econ.washington.edu/user/erose/hypergamy_solew.pdfTHE END OF THE SUCCESS GAP?

    “The success gap for women age 40-44 declined significantly in the 1980’s and 1990’s. In fact, according to some measures, the gap has disappeared.

    Hypergamy has declined as well. What has changed is that marriage rates for the less educated have declined precipitously, although the patterns differ for blacks and for whites. I also track education-marriage and education-motherhood profiles.”


    Source date (UTC): 2012-03-29 18:53:00 UTC

  • HYPERGAMY? I think this is more of a numeric artifact produced by declining marr

    http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2012/03/puerto-rico-hypergamy-fact-of-the-day.htmlREDEFINING HYPERGAMY?

    I think this is more of a numeric artifact produced by declining marriage rates, and an error in over-attribution of status to income. Women are not ENTIRELY money motivated, just as men are not ENTIRELY motivated by physical attraction.

    1) Hypergamy is not synonymous with mating with alphas, only ‘the best she can get’. Or ‘better than she is used to’.

    2) If male status signals are less dependent upon income, then they will be more dependent upon physical traits, relationships and behavior. In other words, men who are underemployed will find alternate means of signaling.

    The eastern european and Mediterranean (PIGS) males manage to do this effectively already. So do african american males. They exaggerate masculine traits which cast higher income males as effeminate. In other words, traditional masculine traits and physicality compensate for income signals.

    I don’t know why this is surprising. Males vary more than females in ability. There are always ‘unfit’ males that women must ‘marry down’ or ‘mate down’ with. Simply because without polygamy or serial marriages, some portion of women must always ‘settle’ because of the scarcity of ‘good’ men.

    3) This change is occurring only in the lower classes. And only relates to marriages not mates.

    4) The combined burden of unemployed and unemployable males and dependent females will have a higher impact on the state’s finances and the polity than any change in mating patterns. THis will further undermine the institution of marriage and individual accountability (as Murray suggests.)

    But in essence, I think as economists we overrate income. It’s just one of the available signals. And since women and men have different reproductive strategies, and since men vary more than women in ability, it is quite possible for men to adapt without impact to traditional masculine and feminine gender concepts that are outside of the economic sphere.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-03-29 18:45:00 UTC

  • END OF HYPERGAMY? I don’t think so. A redefinition of marrying up is more likely

    http://www.amazon.com/dp/1439197717/ref=tsm_1_fb_lkTHE END OF HYPERGAMY?

    I don’t think so. A redefinition of marrying up is more likely instead. I do think that there is a permanently unemployable lower class of men that will choose to demonstrate their masculinity in more masculine ways — as do Mediterranean and african american men. That said, we’ve reached the balance point in the economy, with women replacing lower quintile men — thus accurately reflecting IQ distributions between the genders.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-03-29 18:40:00 UTC

  • Haidt – liberals and conservatives – their sentimental differences

    http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/the-righteous-mind-by-jonathan-haidt.xmlJonathan Haidt – liberals and conservatives – their sentimental differences.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-03-25 18:05:00 UTC

  • RULE 🙂 “Our study confirms our hypothesis that people with autism have higher p

    http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/News/Media-office/Press-releases/2012/WTVM054757.htmAPIES RULE 🙂

    “Our study confirms our hypothesis that people with autism have higher perceptual capacity compared to the typical population. This can only be seen once the task becomes more demanding, with more information to process. In the more challenging task conditions, people with autism are able to perceive significantly more information than the typical adult.”

    “The finding may help explain why people with autism spectrum disorders, such as Asperger’s syndrome, may excel in some careers … which can require intense concentration and the ability to process a great deal of information …

    Our study clearly shows that people with autism can do better than typical adults in tasks involving rapid presentations of a lot of information.”

    Aspies, depending upon the severity, are at a disadvantage in some ways, but you can learn empathy if you work at it.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-03-25 18:00:00 UTC

  • Oil is nowhere near as troublesome as the different points of Peak Female and Ma

    http://www.capitalismv3.com/2012/03/23/the-real-reasons-there-arent-many-high-earning-female-ceos-and-business-owners/Peak Oil is nowhere near as troublesome as the different points of Peak Female and Male participation in the workforce. Unemployed women can participate in child rearing. Unemployed men create civil disruptions.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-03-23 22:35:00 UTC

  • FILLICIDE STATISTICS “Among children under age 5 years in the United States who

    FILLICIDE STATISTICS

    “Among children under age 5 years in the United States who were murdered in the last quarter of the 20th century, 61% were killed by their own parents: 30% were killed by their mothers, and 31% by their fathers. … 72% of the mothers had psychological problems.” — From 39 combined studies.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-03-02 06:26:00 UTC

  • DO YOU TALK TO YOURSELF? Why do people talk to themselves? The humorous response

    DO YOU TALK TO YOURSELF?

    Why do people talk to themselves? The humorous response is “So that I have someone intelligent to talk to.” But humor aside, the traditional psychologist’s argument has been that by involving more senses, verbalization helps to block out distractions, and to focus our thinking – especially when alone, and when under stress or when we want to plan.

    But in Daniel Kahneman’s language, it means “System 2’s intentional system can more easily take control of System 1’s automatic system”. I tend to think of it as intentionally inserting stimulation into system 1.

    System 1 is very, very loud in my head. That’s why I like to be around people. They keep me linked to the real world despite the bright and intense mental reality that emerges from System 1, in someone who has such exceptional memory. I think all mild “Aspies” have this problem, and all Autistic people are complete victims of it.

    Does this sound like I’m happy to intellectualize talking to myself? It does. It also explains why I’m more likely to do it when I’m tired and surrounded by a lot of stimulation: the need to crowd out the sensory data so that I can focus on whatever it is I’m trying to concentrate upon. Most Aspies and all Autistics cannot as easily filter stimuli as well as normal people.

    Perhaps I’ll feel a smidgen less guilty about talking to myself when I’m trying to plan the rest of my day from now on – but I doubt it.

    =====

    PLEASE READ

    Please read “Thinking Fast And Slow”. For those people who haven’t kept up with research in psychology, he’s condensed the past half century into a few narratives which will help you understand our world better. And most importantly for conservatives and libertarians, he’s helped explain why conservatives are right in their concern about human hubris in everything – because we are intuitive more than rational and our intuition is terrible at statistics. In fact, the fact that we need the field of statistics is an attempt to overcome our incompetence in judgements about complex relations.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-01-23 11:01:00 UTC