The critic criticizes, the creator makes.
OMG. That’s it. ENVY AND CONTROL
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-26 05:16:00 UTC
The critic criticizes, the creator makes.
OMG. That’s it. ENVY AND CONTROL
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-26 05:16:00 UTC
WE ARE COMPATIBLE
1 – MALE AND FEMALE REPRODUCTIVE COMPATIBILISM.
2 – PROGRESSIVE, LIBERTARIAN, AND CONSERVATIVE MORAL COMPATIBILISM.
3 – ARISTOCRATIC AND ASHKENAZI SOCIAL COMPATIBILISM.
You know, that it’s democracy that makes us incompatible. Because under democracy, we have nothing but tyranny of the majority, because democracy merely justifies monopoly. The market allows us to cooperate even though we have different preferences and values. But the market can’t always help us with commons. Why isn’t the government like a market; a place for exchanges, rather than a means of justifying one group’s dominance of another?
THE TRUTH MAKES US COMPATIBLE.
But only if the law reflects the truth.
There is only one moral principle.
And every time we violate it, we lose an opportunity for mutually constructive exchange. We create conflict.
We were the people who told the truth. They taught us to lie.
ITS TIME FOR A RESTORATION
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-24 08:43:00 UTC
http://yoelinbar.net/papers/political_diversity.pdfPolitical Diversity in Social and Personality Psychology
Yoel Inbar and Joris Lammers – Tilburg University
—“A lack of political diversity in psychology is said to lead to a number of pernicious outcomes, including biased research and active discrimination against conservatives. The authors of this study surveyed a large number (combined N = 800) of social and personality psychologists and discovered several interesting facts. First, although only 6% described themselves as conservative βoverall,β there was more diversity of political opinion on economic issues and foreign policy. Second, respondents significantly underestimated the proportion of conservatives among their colleagues. Third, conservatives fear negative consequences of revealing their political beliefs to their colleagues. Finally, they are right to do so: In decisions ranging from paper reviews to hiring, many social and personality psychologists said that they would discriminate”—
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-23 14:43:00 UTC
[J]ust as male and female evolutionary strategies are different, but compatible with the proper institutions and incentives, White European and Jewish evolutionary strategies are different, but compatible with the proper institutions and incentives. But would the jews give up their parasitic ethics? I don’t think so. Any more than whites will give up heroism. Truth and trust are far less advantageous that pragmatism and parasitism. Truth and trust works best for a warrior people. But for a commercial people pragmatism and parasitism is a superior strategy. The problem is that you can’t build fixed capital without warriors.
[J]ust as male and female evolutionary strategies are different, but compatible with the proper institutions and incentives, White European and Jewish evolutionary strategies are different, but compatible with the proper institutions and incentives. But would the jews give up their parasitic ethics? I don’t think so. Any more than whites will give up heroism. Truth and trust are far less advantageous that pragmatism and parasitism. Truth and trust works best for a warrior people. But for a commercial people pragmatism and parasitism is a superior strategy. The problem is that you can’t build fixed capital without warriors.
COMPATIBILISM
Just as male and female evolutionary strategies are different, but compatible with the proper institutions and incentives, White European and Jewish evolutionary strategies are different, but compatible with the proper institutions and incentives. But would the jews give up their parasitic ethics? I don’t think so. Any more than whites will give up heroism. Truth and trust are far less advantageous that pragmatism and parasitism. Truth and trust works best for a warrior people. But for a commercial people pragmatism and parasitism is a superior strategy. The problem is that you can’t build fixed capital without warriors.
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-23 00:11:00 UTC
ONE OF THOSE THINGS THAT I DIDN”T WANT TO UNDERSTAND
My work has led me to this conclusion:
1) Humans must acquire – and acquire all sorts of things.
2) To acquire among others we negotiate.
3) In negotiation we justify.
4) We trade signals to to obtain discounts in exchange for status.
5) Truth (correspondence) about the real world provides a negotiating advantage.
6) Truth in social matters would disallow discounts obtained in exchange for status (or other opportunity)
I will try to expand that a bit, but it isn’t any more complicated than that.
Some people are much better at justifying than others. (verbal acuity)
Universalism is a form of justification that makes use of cognitive biases: Caldnin’s “weapons of influence” are means by which we justify (steal) in by taking advantage of cognitive biases.
Our genes are selfish, They need to be. And selfish genes win.Truth can be an advantage or a handicap. Justification can be an advantage or a handicap.
If you grasp this then it sort of ruins the whole moral nature of christendom. We are not families. If we treat one another as kin then, some families will be destroyed by other families.
Cooperation on means is mutually beneficial. But, universalism is a deceptive attack on the excellent and true. It is parasitism.
If that doesn’t ruin your philosophical day, then not a lot will.
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-20 01:26:00 UTC
(man stuff) (creepy)
Last night, tall, late 50’s, unfit, total lack of shoulder and chest muscle, clearly sedentary, beta male, with a ‘travel companion’ arrives at the hotel, both with uncomfortable body language. He displays nervous but boyish glee, she the professionalism of a salesperson. While just above average by Ukrainian standards, she’s in the upper 10% of western standards.
These women can make 800 a month in usual jobs, or a thousand dollars to two thousand dollars or more a day accompanying some guy on trips. In case that isn’t clear, she can make more money on a two week vacation than she can in a whole year in a regular job.
I mean. I am not against it at all. But the freaking guy made my skin crawl. So my objection is merely empathy for her as a business person. I have spent most of my life in consulting. It’s all too often prostitution – doing what you don’t like, and sometimes what doesn’t need to be done, and once in a while, what shouldn’t be done, for money.
Now I’m one of those people that won’t do what shouldn’t be done – for money or otherwise. But I have done a lot of things I didn’t enjoy doing.
Creepy customers are something to avoid – no matter which profession that you’re in.
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-19 23:57:00 UTC
http://billmoyers.com/2014/07/17/scientists-are-beginning-to-figure-out-why-conservatives-are%E2%80%A6-conservative/Old news but conventional wisdom changes through repetition.
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-18 06:24:00 UTC
Lets face it. Men invented sunglasses so we could leer less obviously on one hand and show less fear and insecurity on the other. π
Its a win under both conditions. π
Rayban polarized. )
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-16 05:03:00 UTC