Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • SELF DECEPTION: THE ELEPHANT, THE RIDER, THE DEMON, AND THE MACHINE The “Rider”

    SELF DECEPTION: THE ELEPHANT, THE RIDER, THE DEMON, AND THE MACHINE

    The “Rider” may not be able to engage in self deception, but the “Elephant” can absolutely deceive the “Rider”.

    The Rider: Reason (System 2) (the calculative system)

    The Elephant: Intuition (System 1) (The “Search” system)

    The Demon : The Cooperative Instinct (System 0) (Biases Property to Reproductive strategy)

    The Machine : The “Property” Instinct : (System Null) (Acquisitiveness)

    I knew it was possible to engage in self-deception, but I wasn’t able to articulate it before. Since ‘self’ consists of three entities, and the ‘self’ we are cognizant of is only one of three agents, the elephant can train the rider. Easily it turns out.

    The Demon is not aware of itself, it merely responds to commands. The Rider is cognizant of the elephant, but the Elephant chooses between the rider and the Demon, and never tells the rider of the Demon.

    HUMANS ENGAGE IN SELF DECEPTION. THE SINGULAR SELF IS A FALLACY. THE ARGUMENT AGAINST SELF DECEPTION DEPENDS UPON THIS FALLACY.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-10-08 13:19:00 UTC

  • “GENDER DIFFERENCES” READING LIST THE ANATOMY OF LOVE by Fisher WHY WE LOVE by F

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0449908976THE “GENDER DIFFERENCES” READING LIST

    THE ANATOMY OF LOVE by Fisher

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0449908976

    WHY WE LOVE by Fisher

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0805077960

    A NATURAL HISTORY OF LOVE by Ackerman

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0679761837/

    THE ART OF LOVE by Ovid

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0375761179/

    THE RED QUEEN by Ridley

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0060556579/

    DEMONIC MALES by Petersen

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0395877431

    THE ESSENTIAL DIFFERENCE by Baron-Cohen

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/046500556X/

    FEMINISM AND FREEDOM (its genetic) by Levin

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0887381251/

    WHY MEN RULE by Goldberg

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0812692373/

    THE INEVITABILITY OF PATRIARCHY

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0688001750/


    Source date (UTC): 2014-10-06 15:59:00 UTC

  • “UNAPOLOGETIC LIVING”– Masculinity for the 21st century. No more apologies. For

    –“UNAPOLOGETIC LIVING”–

    Masculinity for the 21st century.

    No more apologies.

    For anything.

    It was messy dragging the world out of ignorance and poverty.

    Yeah, we could have done a better job at it for sure.

    But the fact is, that from Burke forward, we did it.

    So I don’t apologize.

    Sorry.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-10-06 10:51:00 UTC

  • not narcissism. It’s theatre. Sorry but you’re making two catastrophic errors: 1

    http://stumblingandmumbling.typepad.com/stumbling_and_mumbling/2014/10/narcissism-hubris-and-success.htmlIt’s not narcissism. It’s theatre.

    http://stumblingandmumbling.typepad.com/stumbling_and_mumbling/2014/10/narcissism-hubris-and-success.html

    Sorry but you’re making two catastrophic errors:

    1) that rational argument is persuasive. That leadership of a body of people is rational. Only very naive people who lack experience as leaders make this error. Quite the contrary: mastering delivery, mastering body language. Mastering moral intuitions. Mastering not rhetoric but sermon is both difficult, an art, and mastery of leadership. I would enumerate the reasons why but this is the wrong forum.

    (2) Any reasonable student of Michels, Burnham, or the vast body of data on organisations would remind us of the obvious: that leadership is necessary, and great leaders are in fact worth their high cost to organisations.. Man is a tribal creature and a moral creature. Reason is a thin layer of justification and nothing more. We do not make great organisations by rational argument but by constructing a moral narrative in which all members are heroes.

    Some people should get out more.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-10-05 16:09:00 UTC

  • RESULTS OF TWIN STUDIES behavioural genetics and twin studies | hbd chick

    http://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2014/10/05/behavioral-genetics-and-twin-studies/CONFIRMING RESULTS OF TWIN STUDIES

    behavioural genetics and twin studies | hbd chick


    Source date (UTC): 2014-10-05 15:00:00 UTC

  • WHAT OPERATIONS ARE INVOLVED IN EACH OF THESE PROCESSES? (important) Reacting (t

    WHAT OPERATIONS ARE INVOLVED IN EACH OF THESE PROCESSES?

    (important)

    Reacting (to stimuli)

    Daydreaming

    Thinking

    Reasoning

    Calculating

    Following an Algorithm


    Source date (UTC): 2014-10-05 04:53:00 UTC

  • “A Norwegian businessman explained to me the other day that he comes to Lviv oft

    –“A Norwegian businessman explained to me the other day that he comes to Lviv often because Scandinavia has become a place completely devoid of femininity. I think it lazy, however, to blame the women. Men must realize that it has been decades since we were masculine. When was the last time you rose when a woman arrived at your table? wore a suit to the airport? fixed a leak in your sink? or had a fist fight?”-Don Finnegan


    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-30 14:27:00 UTC

  • Women have a lot of choices from 16-32, and men have a lot of choices from 35-up

    Women have a lot of choices from 16-32, and men have a lot of choices from 35-upward. So men are sort of picky complainers about women in my age range the same way that women are picky complainers when they are in their prime. The problem in our range is money. You can find nice girls, pretty girls, smart girls, and girls who don’t want to spend your money with reckless abandon. But its very hard to find all of that in one package.

    One of the reasons Ukrainian women in the last category are so rare, is that women compete here on femininity not masculinity, so they need resources to do that, and the result doesn’t make money, but encourages laxity. In the states women first want a man to increase status and consumption, then to increase resources for reproduction, then to provide economic security when the children are gone. Men tend to want the same thing all along: sex, nesting and care-taking.

    I have usually done pretty well by sacrificing a bit on looks to get intelligence. I suppose women look at me and sacrifice hight for intelligence (lol). However the combination of not-nice, and spending your money with abandon, is a pretty bad deal, no matter how smart and pretty they are.

    And since I am pretty much incapable of existence in the world without that care-taking, I’d prefer it was nice and to control the costs. 🙂

    sigh.

    Why share this. ‘Cause men don’t. And should. Whether you live old age in wealth or poverty depends largely on the woman you choose.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-30 11:02:00 UTC

  • memory is an awesome thing. new card. saw the pin printed about a month ago when

    memory is an awesome thing. new card. saw the pin printed about a month ago when i opened the mail. thought I’d copy it down later. realized I hadn’t, the other day. woke up this morning. vaguely recalled the moment. and then bang, there it is. so cool.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-29 12:09:00 UTC

  • The Evolution of Cooperation

    1) Acquisitiveness: To survive and reproduce, humans must acquire and inventory many categories of resources, and evolved to demonstrate constant acquisitiveness of those resources. 2) Property: The scope of those things they act upon, or choose not to act upon, in anticipation of obtaining as inventory (a store of value), constitute their demonstrated definition of property-en-toto.* (See Butler Schaeffer) “That which and organism defends.” 3) Value: Human emotions evolved to reflect changes in state of property-en-toto.* As such nearly all emotions can be expressed in terms of reactions to property. (imposed costs here, pre-moral, but also pre-cooperation, and only defense and retaliation, not cooperation) 4) Non-Conflict: That which humans act to obtain without imposition upon in-group members they evolved to intuit as their property, and demonstrate this intuition by defense of their inventory, and by their punishment of transgressors. 5) Cooperative Production: That which humans act in concert with one another to produce. (Important take-away is that the purpose of cooperation is material and reproductive production.) 6) Moral (cooperative) Intuitions(instincts): Moral intuitions reflect prohibitions on free riding by members with whom one cooperates in production and reproduction. (This is where free riding enters.) 7) Distribution of Intuitions by Reproductive Strategy: Moral intuitions vary in intensity to suit one’s reproductive strategy. This intensity and distribution of moral intuition varies between males and females, as well as between classes and between groups. 8) Variation By Family Structure: Moral rules reflect prohibitions on free riding given the structure of the family in relation to the necessary and available structure of production. 9) Resolution of Disputes: Property rights were developed in law as the positive enumeration in contractual form, of those moral rules which any polity (corporation) agrees to enforce with the promise of violence for the purpose of restitution or punishment. Conversely, any possible property rights not expressed, the community (corporation) is unwilling to adjudicate, restore or punish, or has not yet discovered the need to construct. 10) Instrumentation: Property rights are necessary for the instrumental measurement of moral prohibitions because of the unobservability of changes in human emotional states, and our inability to determine truth from falsehood. And as such we require an observable proxy for evidence of changes in state. 11) Family: As a general rule, as the division of knowledge and labor increases, so must the atomicity of property rights, and as a consequence, the size of the family must decline {Consanguineous, Punaluan, Pairing (Serial Marriage), Hetaeristic, Traditional, Stem, Nuclear, Absolute Nuclear}. 12) Transaction Costs: As the division of labor increases, relationships increase in distance from kin, increase in anonymity, decrease common interest, and the incentive to seize opportunities rather than adhere to agreements increases. This decrease creates the problem of trust, which increases costs of insuring any agreement is fulfilled, and decreases the overall number of possible agreements and the number of participants in any structure of production. 13) Trust (ethics in production): As a general rule, for the size of the family to decrease, and division of labor to increase in multi-part *complexity* then trust must increase, and trust can only increase with expansion of property rights to include prohibitions on unethical actions. Mere ostracization, boycotting and reputation are insufficient to preserve agreements (contracts). 14) Moral Competition (ethics in political production): (morals property rights, cheating) As a general rule, the scope of moral prohibitions expressed as property rights, must increase to limit demand for authority. 15) Demand for Authority: As a general rule, if a delay in the production of property rights evolves, then demand for authority will fill the vacuum with some form of authority to either suppress retaliation (conflict) or to prevent circumstances leading to conflict, or both.