Education can help following rules. It cannot improve intelligence directly. But it can improve one’s use of the intelligence one has.
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-01 16:48:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719758388937068811
Reply addressees: @thedualMan @mhsalameh @DillyHussain88
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719758121231335519
RT @EPoe187: One thing I’ve noticed: Although talking about race differences is still taboo, fewer people plaintively ask: But why talk abo…
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-01 04:11:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719567776174497882
RT @curtdoolittle: @Jake64533383814 @JohnArthurRyan THE “I THINKS” OF WHY WE LOST
I think the pill, abortion, ending liability for the inte…
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-31 18:03:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719414908628930832
THE “I THINKS” OF WHY WE LOST
I think the pill, abortion, ending liability for the interference in a marriage, enacting involuntary marriage (common law marriage, state imposed marrage), no fault divorce, common property, alimony, and child support, especially child support for non-biological children was a catastrophe and there is no escaping it.
I think giving women the vote without giving them a separate lower house of government was a catastrophe because women think speak and act (and vote) against responsibility in everything they do – despite that our civilization’s success is almost entirely cauased by our maximization of individual responsibility in exchange for individual rights. Multi-house government exists to produce and test concurrency between the regions and classes. We neede another house for the sexes. This would create a market for the production of commons that preserved the interests of the minority (productive men in this case) from mob rule (women).
I think introgression of women into the workforce displaced men from the more family-friendly jobs more than added a contribution, and then offshoring male jobs displaced those displaced. Immigration has only exacerbated that problem dramatically.
I think all productivity contributed by women’s addition to the workforce has been consumed by increases in taxation. An I know for certain that it’s destroying our rates of reproduction necessary to maintain benefits and services.
I think we misunderstand our failure to make good use of and prevent bad use of fiat currency, and we tend to throw the baby out with the bathwater. I think the abuse of the pretense of eternal growth to rely on intergenerational redistribution via the benefits system, instead of using the singapore method of saving and investing is the bigger problem. I think interest on consumer purchase of capital like homes and durable goods is a crime. (I’m correct). I think taxation that’ contributed to the general pool and isn’t itemized as expense, debt, and repayment, is a crime.
When I say “I think” It really means “I know”. 😉 I’m just being polite. 😉
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation
Reply addressees: @Jake64533383814 @JohnArthurRyan
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-31 18:03:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719414855109603328
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719409976748462501
I’d have to understand what you mean by ‘never get’ what?
The feminine mind empathizes in time while the masculine systematizes over time.
This produces a concept of individuals vs polities.
The feminine mind will demonstrate the “NAXALT/AXALT” fallacies. It’s the easiest method of identifying sex differences in cognition.
The feminine mind will react against individual pressure to adapt. The masculine mind wont. Because having to think instead of feel requires self regulation, and the feminine mind seek to depend on feeling rather than thinking whenever possible.
Reply addressees: @JayWalk87598457 @lleahgold @schizarella
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-31 16:14:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719387499066269699
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719373944736653428
There are factions. Some are bad. Some are good. Just like your generation has absolutely immature infantilized cowardly uselees males, and some of the opposite. The early 20th created the false promise of the end of scarcity and the promise of endless growth. That dream ended in the 70s. Nixon-to-Regan’s financialization kept it working through the 90’s. But by then we’d exhausted both financialization and our economic leverage over the developing world. This crashed in 08. And we should have a world macro crisis reorganizing the world between 2020and 2035. Right now it’s starting and building momentum.
But the unerlying problem is really just women – or more im portantly, single women. That’s who determines the vote. And that’s who the politiy and economy pander to. And women will never vote for or advance responsibilty, agency, or competition.
Reply addressees: @RealDanielShays @sqpatrick77
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-30 14:21:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1718996619775885312
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1718995179955220909
No. And get ready: female employment is the greatest prophylactic … as long as you don’t promote underclass reproduction and instead, radically constrain it.
War is however one of the four means of radical reorganization of society. And often for the worse.
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-29 22:59:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1718764448406454438
Reply addressees: @PatrickSRRAUSCH @DreadBobby1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1718762114746024343
Declining scale as neoteny progresses:
Aggression < impulsivity < midfulness.
African and afro-asiatic populations more so.
Iranic-to-caucasian populations less so.
Europeans less so.
Asians less so.
Mindfulness training can modify almost all human groups to some degree and…
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-29 18:54:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1718702851361235403
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1718680202325160381
Height is usually selected in favor of protein, strength, climate, … and war.
Genetic Factors:
Founder Effects: Northern European populations could have experienced founder effects that emphasized genes for greater height and a more robust physique.
Positive Selection: These genetic traits may have offered survival advantages in the environments where these populations evolved, thereby becoming more common over generations.
Climate: The cold climate may have led to a selection pressure favoring a body type that conserves heat more efficiently. Larger, sturdier bodies have a lower surface area-to-volume ratio, which aids in heat conservation.
Diet: A diet rich in protein and dairy, facilitated by agriculture and animal husbandry, can lead to greater height and robustness.
Sexual Selection: Cultural preferences could favor taller, sturdier builds. Over time, this would result in a population that is taller on average.
Social Stratification: In some societies, height and build could be associated with social standing, potentially leading to better opportunity for nutrition and mating for taller individuals, which could be passed on to offspring.
Reply addressees: @thedualMan @EPoe187 @DrCamiloOrtiz
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-29 18:24:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1718695230004740096
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1718681537724535173
If the feminine mind did not hold the unconstrained vision, mothers would give up on their children. If the masculine mind did not hold the constrained vision, no group would survive the disorder. So, we see feminine opportunity and masculine scarcity. Evolution always divides the labor. Among humans it divides the cognitive labor of “TIME and SCALE”.
(Note: See Thomas Sowell: A Conflict of Visions)
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-28 13:14:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1718254870413578240