Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

—“Why are we continually surprised by the level of evil women will do?”—Bryan
We discussed this in a recent staff meeting because it was the most significant outstanding question in understanding the current crisis.

And it turns out that while the ‘true nature of women’ was preserved until women were given the vote, it’s a western metaphysical, cultural, traditional presumption that began with women taking care of the farms (business) while men fought in the summers, through the medieval period’s attempt to domesticate men via chivalric ethics – which didn’t work until the rise of the middle class – through the victorian period that sought to domesticate the underclasses into middle class behavior as the industrial revolution took hold on society – through the progressive movement by the new england protestant women to advance the black vote, as precursor to advance the women’s vote – through the postwar NeoMarxist-Postmodern-Feminist sequence to undermine the west using women and minorities (just as they had with christianity).

No other civilization lionizes women outside of their roles in family. And every other civilization except those that have followed our model (japan, korea) has maintained the traditional tradition of contraining women to the domain of emotions and outside of the demotions of management, government, and war.

I’m still working on this question a bit, and I’ll continue until I’ve falsified it down to the sequence of first principles. But as far as I know, this answer (above) is correct. It’s one of the many reasons why the west differs so greatly from the rest, such that we are “W.E.I.R.D.” Because we gave women responsibility and held them to it at the level of their competency, and maintained laws and customs that prevented the exercise of their natural antisocial to antipolitical behavior. In other words, our laws and customs limiting female anti-social/anti-political behavior: the demand for agency without responsibility, and the demand for irresponsibilty in all things, by social wafare
using “GSRRM” or the sequence of ‘undermining to canceling to sedition to treason’ – therby using the weapon they evolved to rally males against alphas so that women (or just females back then) could control their reproduction and mazimize the number of males from which they could extract resources.

These laws and traditions we no longer enforce because of our hypothesis of an equality among humans that does not exist and cannot exist, and if it existed we would not only no longer be human – we would no longer be conscious beings, and we would regress to the bottom of the distribution – which is exactly what’s happening as women and their demand for irresponsibilty is propagated through the civilization through the democratic institutions without defense against the feminine instinct to promote anti-social to anti-political behaivor.

Cheers

Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation

Reply addressees: @bryanbrey @lporiginalg @DarnelSugarfoo

–“Evil men are punished for their bad behavior to a far greater extent than evil women are punished for their bad behavior. Both Machiavellian men and Machiavellian women exist, but men are held accountable more than women. We need to resolve the problem from both ends.”–@taylorburrowes

Yes you are correct. But men’s antisocial behavior is immediately dangerous and women’s antisocial beahvior is cumulatively harmful.

As far as I know I’ve done more work on this subect than anyone else past or present. And the only question that I simply can’t find a comfortable answer to is why do westerners in particular (W.E.I.R.D. culture) tolerate women’s antisocial behavior (undermining to sedition by social warfare), when other civilizations don’t. And when the Common Law did prohibit these behaviors prior to the constitutional era. Gossiping (undermining), and Shrilling (Karens), or anything that ‘disturbed the king’s peace’ by sewing discord was criminalized and we have some interesting records of punishment for it throughout the medieval period.

So women are only recently (since given the vote and entry into the work force) able to use politics and economics to scale their intutions. Yet these intuitions are the polar opposite of those that have made european civilization so disproportionately successful vs the rest. If not for women’s votes – or at least, single women’s votes – we would not have the crisis of the age.

Now, women’s behavior differs from men by a very simple set of variables that are rather obvious in differences in brain organization, neurochemistry, and behavior. Largely, the sexes evolved a division of labor in time, or what we call feminine empathizing in time vs masculine systematizing over time. This resulted in the feminine prey dominance in cognition and the masculine predator dominance in cognition. And together these resulted in masculine search for status and reproductive advantage by seeking responsibilty for private an common capital despite the risks of doing so, versus the feminine search for hyperconsumption, hypergamy, and irresponsibilty for common capital because of the risk involved in conflict and settlement of disputes over common capital.

Thats really the difference and that’s all of it. And that’s also what’s evidenced in sex differences in antisocial behavior, as well as sex differences in moral intution, and sex differences in political bias. Men for for maximizing individual responsibility and women vote for minimizing individual responsibility. For the reasons I’ve stated.

This only changes when women have three or more children, and then they carry the burden of the behavior of children the way men carry the burden of behavior of all of society – including the dangerous men.

It’s really that simple. 😉

Cheers

Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation

Reply addressees: @Josh_Ebner @taylorburrowes @NoahRevoy