Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • Why Aren’t There More Female Directors

    [T]op 100 films (directed by women) – a list by minalex The problem is that there is only one money making director on that list that can compete with men as a rule rather than as an outlier, and that’s KB. It’s not about whether you like the movie. It’s about whether people will drive, fill up the gas, get a date, drive more, park, walk, buy tickets, grab something at the snack bar, watch a movie, go for a drink or food after the movie, drive the date home, drive home. If you cant get someone to do that it’s not a movie. It’s a daydream. It’s not business its recreation. If you want to make it as a woman director, follow the advice we got in film school: shoot a trailer, shoot a sex scene (yeah, that’s what we were taught – it’s hard to do), shoot a car chase, shoot a horror movie that doesn’t make people laugh at you, and blow people away with how much emotion you created with how little resources. A drama doesn’t take skill in managing the audience experience. Then make the case you will make money. After all. That’s the business. Men are more likely to trust men. Men are more likely to take risks. Men are more likely to lose health, life, family and home for their work. Men are more likely the high performing outliers. We invest in who we trust. So there is a bias toward men by men for completely logical reasons: evidence. What I remember hearing from women all the time was “I want to make a movie at my pace with my aesthetics, on the budget I need to do that”. Made me cringe. There are thousands of guys out there willing to make a movie that makes money at whatever pace the money requires. You gotta get people out onto the street and into the theatre, you’re competing with video games, and the internet, not other movies. The test is not whether one movie is better than another. Its whether people will choose to go to your movie during it’s first weekend over video games, Netflix, the internet and whatever else they can choose to do. Enough complaining from me. Just tired of dealing with bias claims in all walks of life when the problem is trust and evidence. If women need to make movies because they’re women then raise money and build a studio to do it. If you can’t get into business raising your own money, than that’s just empirical. If you can’t stay in business, then that’s just empirical. Its just what it is. Movie making is an extreme right of the curve high risk business. It’s gambling. Some people do it for love at great personal cost, often, if not most often, experiencing tragic failure. Other people do it because they know how to make money at it. And others are willing to burn life, health, family, friends, and every cent they have to make it happen. And that inspires trust. The kind of trust you give budget to.

  • OMG. Appealing to altrusim is an act of pre-shaming… That’s why it works. damn

    OMG. Appealing to altrusim is an act of pre-shaming… That’s why it works.

    damn.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-22 04:25:00 UTC

  • Some groups are just really, really, really good liars. They have weaponized lyi

    Some groups are just really, really, really good liars. They have weaponized lying in order to take advantage of altruism.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-22 03:37:00 UTC

  • I mean, in any distribution of verbally talented people you will find those who

    I mean, in any distribution of verbally talented people you will find those who engage in truth telling, those who engage in pragmatism, and those who engage in lying.

    We should expect groups of verbally talented people to contain cadres that specialise in cheating, suggestion obscurantism, loading, framing, pseudoscience and lying.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-21 19:12:00 UTC

  • WHY AREN’T THERE MORE FEMALE DIRECTORS? Top 100 films (directed by women) – a li

    WHY AREN’T THERE MORE FEMALE DIRECTORS?

    Top 100 films (directed by women) – a list by minalex

    The problem is that there is only one money making director on that list that can compete with men as a rule rather than as an outlier, and that’s KB.

    It’s not about whether you like the movie. It’s about whether people will drive, fill up the gas, get a date, drive more, park, walk, buy tickets, grab something at the snack bar, watch a movie, go for a drink or food after the movie, drive the date home, drive home. If you cant get someone to do that it’s not a movie. It’s a daydream. It’s not business its recreation.

    If you want to make it as a woman director, follow the advice we got in film school: shoot a trailer, shoot a sex scene (yeah, that’s what we were taught – it’s hard to do), shoot a car chase, shoot a horror movie that doesn’t make people laugh at you, and blow people away with how much emotion you created with how little resources. A drama doesnt take skill in managing the audience experience. Then make the case you will make money. After all. That’s the business.

    Men are more likely to trust men. Men are more likely to take risks. Men are more likely to lose health, life, family and home for their work. Men are more likely the high performing outliers. We invest in who we trust. So there is a bias toward men by men for completely logical reasons: evidence.

    What I remember hearing from women all the time was “I want to make a movie at my pace with my aesthetics, on the budget I need to do that”. Made me cringe.

    There are thousands of guys out there willing to make a movie that makes money at whatever pace the money requires. You gotta get people out onto the street and into the theatre, you’re competing with video games, and the internet, not other movies. The test is not whether one movie is better than another. Its whether people will choose to go to your movie during it’s first weekend over video games, netflix, the internet and whatever else they can choose to do.

    Enough complaining from me. Just tired of dealing with bias claims in all walks of life when the problem is trust and evidence. If women need to make movies becasue they’re women then raise money and build a studio to do it. If you can’t get into business raising your own money, than that’s just empirical. If you can’t stay in business, then that’s just empirical. Its just what it is.

    Movie making is an extreme right of the curve high risk business. It’s gambling. Some people do it for love at great personal cost, often, if not most often, experiencing tragic failure. Other people do it because they know how to make money at it. And others are willing to burn life, health, family, friends, and every cent they have to make it happen. And that inspires trust. The kind of trust you give budget to.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-21 15:47:00 UTC

  • Q&A: “Why do people get triggered by Curt and immediately downvote his videos? T

    Q&A: “Why do people get triggered by Curt and immediately downvote his videos? They’re at least interesting ideas to entertain even if you don’t accept them.”

    I have been openly attacking the MI hierarchy for two years now. And they have no response to my criticisms (they cant have one really – they can only adapt to them.)

    People invest their self worth in these ideologies to the point which they are not competing institutional solutions but hats to hang one’s self worth upon. It’s only logical that they defend their priors by non rational, non-empirical, largely symbolic and emotional means.

    The great thing about Rothbard is that despite being mostly wrong, he’s partly right, and what he’s right about is relatively easy for amateurs to understand.

    If people understood my arguments they would grok that I’m completing the ancap project by converting it from pseudoscience and kantian rationalism to a scientific argument that’s uniform across biology, morality, philosophy, law, politics and economics.

    Which, just in terms of explanatory power is pretty hard to criticize.

    But if the end result is preservation of investment, preservation of self image, rejection of the effort and time needed to improve one’s knowledge and a justification of non-contribution to the commons for the because one is rejected by the mainstream culture, then that’s an excuse for one’s behavior not a pursuit of a moral good, a sustainable political order, or an scientific truth about cooperation among men.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-21 09:55:00 UTC

  • FEMALE STRATEGY The female r-selection strategy also includes: increasing your n

    FEMALE STRATEGY

    The female r-selection strategy also includes: increasing your numbers decreases your risk of (a) bearing the dominance of and abuse of an alpha, (b) bearing unwanted offspring by undesirable mates (c) engaging in status competition with other females and losing (d) running out of allies and assistance in production and care-taking (e) running out of allies in rallying and shaming the alphas (f) defecting to another group if unhappy is less provocative if you’re defecting from larger to smaller numbers (g) hiding in the herd reduces your chance of being eaten – safety in numbers.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-20 16:18:00 UTC

  • simple rule is this: <90 dim. ~105 to fix a machine. ~110-115 get a degree. ~122

    simple rule is this: <90 dim. ~105 to fix a machine. ~110-115 get a degree. ~122-125 abstract ideas. ~140 create new ideas.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-20 14:45:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/667715372448133120

    Reply addressees: @PoseidonAwoke

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/667708025436659712


    IN REPLY TO:

    @PoseidonAwoke

    @curtdoolittle Do we have studies to back this up? Or is this an intuition?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/667708025436659712

  • Pareto, Flynn, Lynn Vanhanen/IQ weath of nations, “Smart Fraction Theory”/le gri

    Pareto, Flynn, Lynn Vanhanen/IQ weath of nations, “Smart Fraction Theory”/le griffe. Not sure if others saw Pareto+S.F.T.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-20 14:42:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/667714544240861184

    Reply addressees: @PoseidonAwoke

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/667708025436659712


    IN REPLY TO:

    @PoseidonAwoke

    @curtdoolittle Do we have studies to back this up? Or is this an intuition?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/667708025436659712

  • And I would say power is also a narrative and that reproductive strategy is the

    And I would say power is also a narrative and that reproductive strategy is the cause – all else is empty words.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-20 12:54:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/667687392049020928

    Reply addressees: @Bruksmentalitet

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/667677257314488321


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/667677257314488321