Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • (I’m also very likey two to three standard deviations beyond you in intelligence

    (I’m also very likey two to three standard deviations beyond you in intelligence. So combine insularity from feminine coercion by undermining (GSRRM), specialization in the methods of feminine lying, and high intelligence – well you’re as obvious to me as a five year old.)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 21:34:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720555154548682995

    Reply addressees: @parrhesiatruth @TweetAxxount1 @bryanbrey @lporiginalg @DarnelSugarfoo

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720552182129295870

  • I don’t have any markers for sociopathy – just the opposite. I do have minor mar

    I don’t have any markers for sociopathy – just the opposite.
    I do have minor markers for aspergers.
    And it is trivial to diagnose others through their use of language – the entire fields of psychometrics computational linguistics do so. I just specialize more than othres in sex…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 21:33:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720554712900993532

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720552182129295870

  • “The blame (for singles) lies on men who are paralyzed by the prospect of that m

    –“The blame (for singles) lies on men who are paralyzed by the prospect of that much responsibility, more so than on the women, I’ll argue.”–

    No.

    Men are rationally reluctant because (a) women are only devoted in time not loyal over time so 80% percent of divorces are…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 20:29:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720538650641825883

    Reply addressees: @J58039716

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720522348908916978

  • “The blame (for singles) lies on men who are paralyzed by the prospect of that m

    –“The blame (for singles) lies on men who are paralyzed by the prospect of that much responsibility, more so than on the women, I’ll argue.”–

    No.

    Men are rationally reluctant because (a) women are only devoted in time not loyal over time so 80% percent of divorces are initiated by women – the more educated the more likely (b) marriage has become a question of INDIVIDUAL friendship, entertainment, and sex, not one of social economic, and political responsibility to the MARRIAGE and to SOCIETY and the POLITY as responsibilty for intergenerational production of people and persistence of the institutions of cultural production as well as the transmission of group evolutionary strategy as culture between generations. (c) divorce r*pe and child support r*pe favor the woman and leave men unable to supply surplus sufficient to provide for a different women, or save for their retirement givent hen men’s working lives are shorter because men accumulate more cdellular damage than women – and the result is vast increases in male poverty and suicide.

    Marriage is non logical. Worse, it’s all but suicidal. And that’s what the data says. You want to fix it? Fix the incentives:
    1. Retore liability for interference in a marriage – it will rapidly end a lot of cheating beucase it will be so costly again than no one can afford it.
    2. End no fault divorce, restoring liability for ending a marriage.
    3. End common property (again).
    4. End Alimony.
    5. End Child support.
    6. Children are a woman’s property until puberty (should be younger really since both sexes are more dependent for mental stability and success on the father after age seven), then the children decide which parent to live with and the parent they live with carries the cost of the children.

    Given the economic performance of women vs men there is no longer a substantive difference in the caretaking capacity of either sex, and no longer a need for two parent incomes to support children as the vast number of single mothers demonstrate.

    The coming economic ‘correction’ will make income much more difficult and will restore the inentive for marriage. But we have to restore the incentive to stay married if we are to produce harmonious intergenerational families.

    PS: redistributing education to the churches who are more inteststed in family than economy and polity will help almost as much.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 20:29:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720538650432196608

  • I’m not sure they’d need a man really. They might as well have a ‘concierge’ man

    I’m not sure they’d need a man really. They might as well have a ‘concierge’ man (small part of a very good man’s time). WHich is .. increasingly obvious a preference.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 20:14:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720534927630815562

    Reply addressees: @0xBigMoonDog

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720526519833854176

  • What is propaganda? “Social Constsruction of A Falsehood”. What genetic predispo

    What is propaganda? “Social Constsruction of A Falsehood”. What genetic predisposition favors social construction? The feminine mind. Who is most succeptible to social construction and most manipulated by social constructions? Women. And among women who is most successfully manipulated? Single women without children.
    Women mature a bit earlier sexually but only mature cognitively when they have three or more children. Men mature later but as soon as they have responsibilty to other men for any form of capital. Sex differences in the same thing: just different capital that is managed by different means. 😉 Really. Nature is dumb and simple. It really is that simple.

    Reply addressees: @APutins


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 20:07:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720533129327181824

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720531660783989201

  • I’m missing something because I don’t know what ‘us’ you’re referring to. I refe

    I’m missing something because I don’t know what ‘us’ you’re referring to. I referred to ‘we’ meaning those of us who study sex differences in cognition.

    I know a great deal about sex differences in neurology and expression and there is zero chance I’m stating anything that’s not in the science (even if it’s a taboo subject). My work is prmiarly in sex differences in lying because I had to discover and explain the left (cognitively feminine) bias better than others (Joh Haidt) has.

    Reply addressees: @parrhesiatruth @bryanbrey @lporiginalg @DarnelSugarfoo


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 20:04:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720532471232512000

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720527908551135675

  • Ok. Again. Sex differences in cognition. Resulting NAXALT/AXALT fallacy. No man

    Ok. Again. Sex differences in cognition. Resulting NAXALT/AXALT fallacy.
    No man interprets a statemetn about human beings (or anything else) as other than a normal distribution.
    If we represent half the world (actually slightly more) as having a strong bias against rationalism (full accounting for costs over population time and space), that means a distribution, but a tendency of the majority, or at least a tendency of those who influence outcomes (which in this case is what matters.)
    Only a woman (or very effeminate man) would immediately react with a NAXALT/AXALT fallacy. It’s one of the primary means of detecting sex differences in text and speech.
    So you’re demonstrating my point.
    (Which is exasperating – I understand)
    But it’s quite simple that empathizing doesn’t scale, and systematizing doesn’t account for individuals. And thats the cognitive division of labor evolution discovered was what we needed to survive.

    Reply addressees: @parrhesiatruth @bryanbrey @lporiginalg @DarnelSugarfoo


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 20:01:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720531668946026496

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720527766251033044

  • (BTW: thank you for being you instead of one of ‘those’ women. I don’t think wom

    (BTW: thank you for being you instead of one of ‘those’ women. I don’t think women appreciate just how MUCH men appreciate good (responsible) women.)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 19:35:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720525216110014532

    Reply addressees: @parrhesiatruth @bryanbrey @lporiginalg @DarnelSugarfoo

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720520666342932914

  • All three paragraphs are true. The question is why you are trying to lie? What c

    All three paragraphs are true.
    The question is why you are trying to lie?
    What causes the cognitively feminine need for social construction of falsehoods sufficient to provide constant reinforcement of falsehoods – when those falsehood are universally evasions of the four sets of laws of the universe?
    1. Physical (scarcity) – The Before States
    2. Behavioral (self interest, demand for reciprocity in cooperation) – The During States
    3. Evolutionary (sexes, classes, races, mutation, load, natural selection) – The After States
    And of course:
    4. The logics by which we express the identity, coherence, correspondence, rational choice, reciprocity, parsimony, completeness within limits, and coherence of our claims – such that we negotiate and cooperate on truth rather than deception.

    What is it the feminine mind (prey response) seeks to evade? (The costs of Responsibility).

    I know why you are trying to lie. It appears to be both instinctual (genetic) and indoctrinated or a selection bias. But do you know why you’re trying to lie? And can you help yourself by learning how to stop lying?

    Reply addressees: @MorctheOrc


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 19:29:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720523608361988096

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720520961022202258