Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • FEELINGS (worth repeating) (quotable) —“as far as feelings go, the truth of th

    FEELINGS

    (worth repeating) (quotable)

    —“as far as feelings go, the truth of them are perceived only over time and never in the moment. At a time of clarity, that is when an emotional response ‘runs clear’ because it has already been through several wave cycles, then truth can be perceived. The body senses truth, the conscious mind observes that process. The observed universe is male. The system is binary as far as I can tell. A 0 and 1. The 1 or male cannot be perceived without the female.”— Lesley Drabble


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-26 06:23:00 UTC

  • ELI STATES LOVE USING TESTIMONIALISM —“I love you” means “I promise that if yo

    ELI STATES LOVE USING TESTIMONIALISM

    —“I love you” means “I promise that if you test the hypothesis that my happiness depends on your own, against my actions, that you will not find it untrue.”— Eli Harman

    priceless.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-26 04:16:00 UTC

  • ELI EXPLAINS THE CHALLENGE IN DESCRIBING LOVE (worth repeating) —“Love (noun)

    ELI EXPLAINS THE CHALLENGE IN DESCRIBING LOVE

    (worth repeating)

    —“Love (noun) refers to the condition in which one’s happiness depends on another’s. And therefore to love (verb) must mean to act in a manner consistent with this condition prevailing. If we adopt these as our definitions, then it becomes obvious, upon cursory examination, that we can never accurately describe actual “love” (either the noun or the verb) as either universal or unconditional for long.”— Eli Harman


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-26 03:29:00 UTC

  • MEN, WOMEN, FRIENDSHIPS, OPPORTUNITIES, AND DISCOUNTS Men tend to have a larger

    MEN, WOMEN, FRIENDSHIPS, OPPORTUNITIES, AND DISCOUNTS

    Men tend to have a larger number of looser friendships, and women a small number of deeper friendships.

    This is partly because of how we judge each other – women need psychological similarity whereas men need utilitarian similarity.

    It is also a matter of what we do with friends. And what we need friends for. Women put men in the friend zone for certain reasons: capital extraction. (discounts).

    Men put women in the friend zone for three reasons: long options on sex, long options on her associations, long options on her emotional support (as a psychologist).

    And men put men in the friend zone for lots of reasons: the safety of the pack. assistance in self improvement. Options on opportunities. And someone to imitate or learn one or more skills from.

    Now also, men have many strategies available to us: research information to create opportunities. Create relationships and collect and exchange information to identify opportunities. Organize in pursuit of opportunities. Produce and opportunistically seize identifiable opportunities. Produce consistently independent of possible opportunities. Produce as little, consume as little, and relax as much as possible. These strategies depend upon our natural abilities. (this is probably something that doesn’t occur to people)

    I would say that if you mean that we should be cautious with others rent-seeking and discounting, that this is true as far as it goes.

    I think it is better to seek to understand the individual male’s strategy, and to limit one’s self to it.

    I mean, those guys in college that figure out how to make money doing just about everything – they are amazing. But so is the scientist and so is the craftsman, and so is the laborer.

    I think what isn’t amazing – what we must watch out for – is a disconnect between a man’s abilities and his strategy.

    The same for women. I think we are too easily led (I certainly am) by their attention, when we have zero option of obtaining returns.

    Parasitism is not unique to gender. We are just wired to tolerate the parasitism of women because options (lottery tickets) on sex are so valuable to us.

    Men give women attention, the way that the poor buy lottery tickets: a very, very, very remote hope that they know will never occur. So that they buy the experience of the fantasy.

    So I think your (James) message is to preserve all your capital. But I am too well aware that every person I meet is a cheap put on opportunity, and I treat them as such. Hence, make a good impression but always be too busy to invest in the fulfillment of others’ opportunities unless it benefits you as much or more than them.

    In business I usually say this “Work with partners with whom you have equal economic interest”. Otherwise you do not have the same interests.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-25 02:44:00 UTC

  • ON CREATIVITY – TRAINING YOURSELF INTO ‘THE ZONE’ (worth repeating) You get much

    ON CREATIVITY – TRAINING YOURSELF INTO ‘THE ZONE’

    (worth repeating)

    You get much better at getting into “the Zone” that you find in the shower (or as you’re just waking up), if you practice writing. I can get almost the same experience just writing. But it’s true that either the shower or driving is hard to beat.

    After the first year or two of writing an hour a day it takes declining effort, finally approaching zero, to write what’s in your brain – shower or no. Why? Because you train yourself to stay in ‘the zone’ and not ‘come out of it’. I used to run from the shower and write it down as fast as I could, by reciting it to myself. I just did what every writer recommended. Don’t try to be better. Just write. You will get better. Best advice I can give is to ignore spelling, puncutation, sentences, and just write a stream of consciousness. then go back and make sense of it. Over time you will get better at organizing your stream of consciousness without effort.

    The real problem that most of us have to overcome is that our imagined visions FEEL like they’re sensible. But until you write them down you haven’t TESTED whether they’re sensible.

    This experience is a cognitive illusion – or bias – that lets us get inspired by an opportunity, yet work to obtain more information until it’s born out or not. It’s evolution at work. Our brain gives us a chemical reward that says ‘keep investigating this opportunity’.

    But we can’t confuse that intuition with understanding. If you can’t state something, you only intuit that there is a relation. You don’t in fact understand that relation, nor can you test it by articulating it.

    I ‘knew’ a lot of what I am doing today in 1986. I knew it in 2001. I knew it in 2006. I knew it in 2009. And I knew it in 2012. But what I learned in each of those drafts, was that I knew nothing at all. I intuited something. But it wasn’t until 2012-2013, and maybe into 2014, that I knew what I intuited. Meaning, that I could write down the roadmap that I intuited as a mere direction in …. what… when I was twelve?

    Your mind is always path-finding. Train yourself to use it.

    It takes a lot of time.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-24 15:08:00 UTC

  • (I remember thinking most music in the 60’s and 70’s was ‘bad’ in the sense that

    (I remember thinking most music in the 60’s and 70’s was ‘bad’ in the sense that I intuited that it was ‘degrading’. Aristocracy is in our genes. )


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-24 04:24:00 UTC

  • (All these nice, calm, good families – because everyone in them gets enough atte

    (All these nice, calm, good families – because everyone in them gets enough attention, and is not ‘industrialized’ by government, employment, school, and entertainment. Druthers? My druthers? Regionalism. Familialism. Contract consumption, credit and taxes. The european model is best. The american experiment in ‘the new family’ is a disaster. )


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-24 02:29:00 UTC

  • Apparently Sheryl Sandberg hasn’t seen the stats on female CEOs

    Apparently Sheryl Sandberg hasn’t seen the stats on female CEOs.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-23 14:25:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/690903175478513664

    Reply addressees: @wef

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/690896888602718208


    IN REPLY TO:

    @wef

    Sheryl Sandberg: ‘Men still run the world – and it’s not going that well’ https://t.co/6INYFUdOob #gendergap #wef https://t.co/MYe5C1WUyL

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/690896888602718208

  • #wef #libertarian #AltRight #NRx #Conservative MEN: So ether we have UNIVERSAL e

    #wef #libertarian #AltRight #NRx #Conservative MEN: So ether we have UNIVERSAL equality in all jobs – or are women just seeking privileges?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-23 11:54:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/690865300703711233

  • #wef #libertarian #AltRight #NRx #Conservative MEN: have inequality in coal mine

    #wef #libertarian #AltRight #NRx #Conservative MEN: have inequality in coal mines. In construction. In the trades. In industrial cleaning.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-23 11:53:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/690865039432097792