[N]o matter how smart your upper classes they cannot compensate for lower classes. No matter how wealthy your upper classes they cannot compensate for lower classes. If you engineer nearly perfect humans you will end up with around 140 IQ’s. (maybe). And it’s expensive. And so what? They don’t behave any better than people with 105 IQ’s.
[N]o matter how smart your upper classes they cannot compensate for lower classes. No matter how wealthy your upper classes they cannot compensate for lower classes. If you engineer nearly perfect humans you will end up with around 140 IQ’s. (maybe). And it’s expensive. And so what? They don’t behave any better than people with 105 IQ’s.
**[M]an is not good or bad, he is rational in his choice of cooperation, parasitism, or predation. We must provide him the incentive to choose cooperation. We must not pretend he does not need the incentive.**
**[M]an is not good or bad, he is rational in his choice of cooperation, parasitism, or predation. We must provide him the incentive to choose cooperation. We must not pretend he does not need the incentive.**
Sorry. Interest in sex usually declines with intelligence. Interest in raising a family does as well. The middle class does all the good.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-06 07:11:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/717610694477217792
Once you realize that the men are just mentally Female but with functioning testicles you don’t take them any more seriously than we take our women.
How much of our vulnerability to lies has to do with treating their men as men instead of women?
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-06 05:56:00 UTC
Sorry. Interest in sex usually declines with intelligence. Interest in raising a family does as well. The middle class does all the good.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-06 03:11:00 UTC
It doesn’t matter if you make smart people better
It only matters if dumb people don’t breed.
It costs a LOT of money to use genetic improvement technology.
It costs noting for ‘evils’ to have sex (other than alcohol).
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-06 02:43:00 UTC
IT”S NOT ABOUT MORE SMART PEOPLE IT”S ABOUT FEWER DIM PEOPLE
No matter how smart your upper classes they cannot compensate for lower classes. No matter how wealthy your upper classes they cannot compensate for lower classes.
If you engineer nearly perfect humans you will end up with around 140 IQ’s. (maybe). And it’s expensive. And so what? They don’t behave any better than people with 105 IQ’s.
Nothing can protect you from the evil 80’s and awful 70’s. You have to get rid of them.
Eugenics lesson of the day.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-06 01:25:00 UTC
—Q&A: “How long does it take to raise IQ?”—
Well line 1M people by their IQ.
Shoot everyone with an IQ below 100.
IQ raised Instantly.
Take 100M people. Sterilize everyone with an IQ below 100.
The effect will be almost immediate, but over two or three generations the IQ will consistently raise.
Take 100M people. Pay people with IQ below 100 who are also unemployed or consistently unemployable, not to have children. The effect will appear within one generation, and continue to improve.
Take 100M people.
Hang all 3 strikes criminals every year without exception.
Sterilize all with IQ below 90 before they are 16.
Pay people with 100IQ or below who are unemployed or consistently unemployable not to have children, or to have only one child.
Pay people with IQ over 125 to have children, and a lot if they have many.
I mean, I can create scenarios all day long. I’ve done quite a few models and it depends on the initial distribution, the age range of reproduction, the number of children .. etc.
Basically it happns as fast or slow as you want it to.
Myself I just recommend the chinese solution: punish the hell out of people who have more than one kid, and reward people at the top who have more than one kid.
Let time do its thing.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-05 07:09:00 UTC