Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • THE MIND AS A PROPERTY CALCULATOR

    THE MIND AS A PROPERTY CALCULATOR


    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-07 02:24:00 UTC

  • REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY

    REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY


    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-07 02:23:00 UTC

  • it was a fantasy to domesticate man but we have done so

    it was a fantasy to domesticate man but we have done so.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-06 11:32:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/773121678998134784

    Reply addressees: @cg_mischling

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/773116106886160384


    IN REPLY TO:

    @cg_mischling

    @curtdoolittle pipe dream

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/773116106886160384

  • We are all attracted to what we understand. We SHOULD learn to be attracted to w

    We are all attracted to what we understand. We SHOULD learn to be attracted to what is GOOD for us. But this depends upon whether what is good for us is (a) available, and (b) obtainable. If not then what is emotionally and sexually good for us may be the best that is both available, and possible to obtain.

    I mean, I am ABSOLUTELY POSITIVE a Victoria’s Secret Angel would be good for me. But they are neither available or obtainable with the assets I have to trade.

    lol


    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-06 11:28:00 UTC

  • “Pathological altruism is quite possibly an unconscious signal that I will coope

    —“Pathological altruism is quite possibly an unconscious signal that I will cooperate even it means my kin may die so that I do not.”—

    The Female Strategy. “It’s ok if they lose as long as I win.”


    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-06 04:50:00 UTC

  • We seek emotions because we evolved those emotions for very obvious reasons: rew

    We seek emotions because we evolved those emotions for very obvious reasons: rewards. What is it that we are seeking a reward for? What change in state or preservation of state do we seek to achieve and for what reason?

    Emotions are only rewards and punishments. What are we rewarded and punished for by monopoly orders?

    Originally, and still in some parts of the world, competition was considered immoral.

    Why isn’t the monopoly of orders, like competition, just lagging indicator of our need to create institutions that allow us to act morally in the new order, rather than cling to what is no longer moral out of habit and intuition?

    BTW: I usually say it this way: we value status signals higher than every other good. Why are status signals valued higher than any other good? Why do we need confidence in our status? Why do we want status signals from others? Why would we evolve such a thing?

    for the same reasons every other species has means of demonstrating fitness. Except that we cooperate, so it is not just reproduction but survival that depends upon our status.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-06 04:23:00 UTC

  • THIS IS A VERY GOOD LINE OF THINKING. As far as I know those feelings of intelle

    THIS IS A VERY GOOD LINE OF THINKING.

    As far as I know those feelings of intellectual bliss are caused by the pack response combined with obviating the labor of reason. Comfort food, comfort of home, comfort of surrendering to the will of the pack.

    Now, there are many kinds of feelings of bliss, as well as pleasure and joy. Some of them are clearly good – church, festival, feast, sporting event, and play. Some of them are less good because they do not require a commons to produce them and therefore require more methods of escape by the individual(communes and cults). Some of them are less good because they cause disconnection from reality(mental states). And some of them are less good because they cause physical and commons damage by consequence when escaping reality (drug use).

    GOOD

    Festivals, sporting events, theatres, Arts, literature, church, prayer/contemplation …. these are all excellent methods of non-destructive experience of the pack response. While metaphorical they are not false. They are safe means of exploring other worlds, and they obtain the consent of the commons.

    HARMFUL THROUGH LOSS OF OPPORTUNITY

    There are those things that are no longer metaphorical but false. Those things neither obtain the consent of the commons but reject it and reality.

    DESTRUCTIVE

    And there are those things that are no longer false but forced – sense-damaging, and body-damaging, and crime-producing drugs.

    CLOSING

    So, i would flip the question around and ask “What failure exists in any commons that other than outlier-individuals would seek refuge from the commons in physical, emotional, and mental escape, at the cost of socializatino, consumption, physical and mental help?

    How should we fix such a commons?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-06 01:56:00 UTC

  • Some of us seek humor, some entertainment, some utility, and some Truth. That ea

    Some of us seek humor, some entertainment, some utility, and some Truth. That each of us takes pleasure in different stimuli tells us a great deal about the division of perception and value.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-05 00:56:00 UTC

  • It’s OK. IQ and educational deficiency effects more than half the population.Man

    It’s OK. IQ and educational deficiency effects more than half the population.Manners are a choice tho. 🙂


    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-03 11:55:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/772040329402998784

    Reply addressees: @izzvrk @CruisingGallows @Alt_Left

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/772039385697005568


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/772039385697005568

  • Are you sure you are up to this discussion? do your emotions inform you correctl

    Are you sure you are up to this discussion? do your emotions inform you correctly or incorrectly? Can they not?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-03 10:34:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/772019940165578752

    Reply addressees: @Paradigmian @lukelea

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/772019363830435841


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Paradigmian

    @curtdoolittle Emotions aren’t true or false either. You can’t empiricize them by changing the terminology. @lukelea @JonHaidt

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/772019363830435841