IMPORANT: Sex diffrencs in loyalty.
In our work we distinguish between women’s devotion in time, vs men’s loyalty over time.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/KCdZqcKBD20
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-13 10:37:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734885299275075648
Causality works both directions. Though there is a bias more to conservative temperament than to adaptation to responsibility for children. That adaptation appears only to affect women.
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-11 23:22:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734352864078626830
Reply addressees: @IvarDiederik @radiofreenw
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734349329370910725
Does comedy, which originates in the feminine cognition’s want of attention, and the violation of rules of norms, and the use of suggestion and manipulation, compensate for the long list of horrific consequences of jewish culture in the behavioral sciences, in jurisprudence, in the decline of the academy, and in sedition ‘the march through the institutions of cultural production’, and in sedition by lawfare?
I keep a list of jewish pseudoscientists sophists and seditionist and it’s not exactly encouraging. And we can explain the difference in jewish vs european ethics – and that difference is polar.
I don’t just criticize but solve the problem. There are holes in our constitution and our law that allow this seditious behavior, and the secuction of women and the less able into that behavior. If we plug those holes, we will adapt just as we have to plugging all other holes in our law that protect us against crime, corruption, sedition, and treason.
Reply addressees: @gildednotsure @OGRolandRat
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-11 19:29:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734294248093028352
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734291374818894026
RT @ycinnewyork: In trying to close the achievement gap between White/Asian and Black/Hispanic, the US has lowered the bar for everyone in…
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-11 17:07:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734258721142759738
RT @NoahRevoy: I’ve seen this happen and keep reminding my big brain friends that we can’t expect 90% of the population to do what we do.…
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-11 14:21:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734216774411784389
Dead argument. Ratios between races remain the same as all boats float proportionally upward under education and food. The Flynn effect was eliminated rather rapidly, and is now reversing due to asymmetric (dysgenic) reproduction. So while it WAS the case at a tiny margin, it’s not the case in general. So no. The problem is neotenic evolution required isolation and speciation events. There were only four of them. This gave rise to the four (five) primary races, and their resulty hybridization due to human sexual plasticity (hyper adaptivity). It’s not clear we can exceed 115 avg without intervention. But it’s also not possible to raise African or South Eurasian IQ without vast eugenics (suppression of reproduction of those under say, 85, which would mean half the population or more in south eurasia and far more in africa.
Reply addressees: @HaakonKaisen @TheJonMartin @NoahRevoy
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-11 00:51:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734012896764379136
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1733935748942831704
(A normie. Be patient with the normies until they engage in denial or deception)
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-10 15:44:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1733875412067885126
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @ovierocks1 @NoahRevoy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1733875138590896331
1) We know (a) women seek dominance displays, and (b) within the limits of their consent.
2) We know this behavior incorporates (a) submission response (b) stimulation by proto-fear that overloads her judgement – which is the ‘hard’ part of female interest.
That said
3) Sample size is too small (120), and sample selection predictable (non-random) for the findings that are stated in the paper.
Summary: this is grad student work trying to get a publication, and should be ignored – just as nearly all social science and psychology research with N<1000 should be questioned.
Reply addressees: @FuryForth @HoneyBadgerBite
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-09 17:57:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1733546361662894080
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1733537482069721169
RT @WerrellBradley: Thank you, Curt and Mr. Mullins!
The operational psychological function, “baiting into hazard,” presents as generating…
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-09 15:55:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1733515846822117528
Interesting. True.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yY8bkEfvGlM
The exchange conversation between the sexes.
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-09 13:49:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1733483893674635267