Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • (What is it with being photo spammed by LBFM’s? Sucker-hunting? I mean, seriousl

    (What is it with being photo spammed by LBFM’s? Sucker-hunting? I mean, seriously. I feel like an unpaid fake account detector.)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-22 11:15:00 UTC

  • THROUGH THIS LIST OF FACIAL EXPRESSIONS Then search for the most handsome men of

    http://historicallyhandsomemen.tumblr.com/LOOK THROUGH THIS LIST OF FACIAL EXPRESSIONS

    Then search for the most handsome men of the contemporary era. And compare the facial expressions.

    What you will see is remarkable.

    You will see a desperate attempt at likability in the present, and calm masculine confidence in the past.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-20 16:20:00 UTC

  • CLASS AND MARRIAGE TYPES Think of ANF as an upper middle class or upper class ma

    CLASS AND MARRIAGE TYPES

    Think of ANF as an upper middle class or upper class marriage where there is a lot of property. It’s an aristocratic marriage technology.

    Think of NF as a middle class marriage.

    Think of Traditional Families as a working class marriage.

    Think of Serial Marriages as a lower class marriage.

    Marriage types evolved to balance insurance from families without much property (Traditional) to insurance from property (ANF).


    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-20 10:21:00 UTC

  • ADD A DIFFERENCE IN AGENCY AND COST TO THE GENDERS The whole (a) Agency ( Left-l

    ADD A DIFFERENCE IN AGENCY AND COST TO THE GENDERS

    The whole (a) Agency ( Left-lacks-agency vs Right-has-agency) concept provides just as much explanatory power as (b) the solipsism vs autism, (c) the intertemporal division of reproductive perception, cognition and labor, (d) the competing but compatible differences in reproductive costs, and (c) R/K (herd/pack) selection analogy.

    But all those statements fall prey to our metaphysical acceptance of some sort of equality, when instead, the consequences of this effect are similar to the evidence of differences in investment strategy: women invest more conservatively (they take less risk) and men more aggressively. So women tend to do better, especially when they work in groups (investment clubs).

    But this is to ignore causality: only men would create a stock market (risk market) containing a sub-market of low risk stocks. Otherwise we would only have investment, bond, and banking industries but no stock market. The stock market functions on speculation and risk calculation. The externality produced by that market is a set of lower risk stocks that those with lower risk tolerance can profit from.

    We see the same thing in claims that women are more civilized. But this is nonsense. Men create civilization by absorbing the majority of stress, damage, and risk.

    Men must defeat the dark forces of time and ignorance. Women must just make use of what ‘gets through our shield-wall’.

    So while women bear higher reproductive production costs. Men bear higher defense, management, and research and development costs.

    And the evidence is that the man’s cost is higher…..

    Civilization is not so much in our interest as it is in our mother’s sisters, wives, and daughter’s. Otherwise. hunting other humans is higher risk but greater enjoyment – and often greater reward.

    Assuming that research and development was invested in weaponry, mobility, fitness, cooperation, and skill.

    Full accounting means never taking any assumptions about natural order for granted.

    Man is a rational creature who chooses rational ends. That is all.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-18 17:00:00 UTC

  • YES THE STOIC REVIVAL IS DETERMINISTICALLY OCCURRING Stoic revival is happening

    YES THE STOIC REVIVAL IS DETERMINISTICALLY OCCURRING

    Stoic revival is happening and can be accelerated. It requires no mysticism, no ‘belief’ (suspension of reason), only discipline. And as such it can be taught as a ‘scientific discipline’, a ‘philosophy’, or a personal religion.

    We cannot hold the ancients responsible for ‘mysticism’ because just as we use pseudoscience and pseudorationalism today they had no other means of explanation available to them

    What’s important is that they attempted to find a way of competing with, succeeding in the world, rather than ignoring it, or escaping it, or denying it – like other cultures did.

    Stoicism is action oriented. it asks you to improve your own human capital (virtues). Through acting. Through gradual achievement. But it allows one to ignore the judgements/opinions of others. That this is simply the internalization of natural law is not obvious.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-18 10:45:00 UTC

  • sentience > awareness > cognition > language > reason > logic > mathematics > op

    sentience > awareness > cognition > language > reason > logic > mathematics > operations.

    I am not sure anyone says language is required for cognition. Only that as we progress from cognition through language through reason etc we are increasingly distancing ourselves from sympathetic tests and moving towards entirely analytic tests. Most of this progression is limited by the ability to hold a concept (context) in short term memory (focus), independently of external stimuli (impulse), long enough to iterate through opportunities (search memory, find patterns, wayfind, then falsify (search for negative consequences.).

    IMHO: language is not necessary, only visualization or perhaps better said, ‘experiential revisitation” which we can observe and judge.

    The problem is that without language one cannot develop complex narratives, write them down, or use symbols. But that’s a qualification on top of the original claim: it’s probably correct to say that cognition does not require language, only that language improves our cognitive ability and is so (incredibly) valuable as a competitive technology that there is greater consequence to verbal (SYMBOLIC is what it means), cognition than EXPERIENTIAL cognition. And speech appears to be the gateway humans found for moving from experiential cognition to symbolic cognition.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-16 10:06:00 UTC

  • MS. “L” I have three objections to the options above: 1)I reject the premise inh

    MS. “L”

    I have three objections to the options above: 1)I reject the premise inherent in these choices. They are based on the assumption that human nature is all about self-interest. Not only is that a harsh view of human nature, it is also inaccurate. An important characteristic of human nature is gregariousness., and depriving people of the capacity is to associate with others is considered harsh punishment, even torture. That is why the use of isolation cells in prison in the Western world is regulated. So I might cooperate with others because I like associating with others–it’s fun!

    Curt Doolittle

    1) only a woman would say such a thing since it demonstrates the cognitive bias of ‘blindness to the distribution”.

    2) human nature *is* demonstrably entirely driven by self interest and we can find no instances where it is not – not only that, we can’t find it anywhere else in nature either. All cooperation is for self beneficial ends. Even kin selection still is for beneficial ends of one’s genes.

    3) the significant difference between humans and other creatures is that we can imitate one another (model one another), such that we can comprehend intention, and therefore cooperate on intentions. That fact aside, we evolved moral instincts to both encourage cooperation but punish parasitism (free riding). All herd and pack animals are gregarious to the herd/pack. Its just good kin selection.

    4) women must bear the high cost of offspring, are weaker and more vulnerable more often and they and their offspring are even vulnerable to other women so they purchase lots of insurance and they experience this insurance purchase as gregariousness. They do so to the point where when given access to political resources (commons) they attempt to give them away (see the dominance of women in government jobs, and in charity work, and the absence of women in the most competitive of professions). This is all nothing but genetic self interest. If creatures were not self-interested they would be exterminated by evolutionary pressures.

    5) Women lie to themselves largely because they have less agency in the control of their emotions. Men lie to others. But not to themselves. It’s too dangerous for them.

    MS. “L”

    2) The identities attached to the various options are stereotypes, especially the father stereotype.

    Curt Doolittle

    Stereotypes are the MOST ACCURATE measurement in the social sciences. So much so that we can pretty much claim that they are the ONLY accurate measurement in the social sciences.

    Female cognitive bias against stereotypes is driven by the need to believe her children are ‘good’ and ‘worth her investment’ regardless of their worth (or worthlessness). It is also because women who ‘stand out’ are destroyed by other women in the pack. Women work together to ensure the even distribution of resources. They hen-peck competitors to ensure they do not obtain more resources.

    MS. “L”

    3) Option #4, the Libertine option, is not even an option. If Libertine is left alone, L. will not be able to participate in the commercial market. If left alone (let’s say with just the immediate family), L. will not have the education, health or infrastructure necessary to participate in the commercial market. For instance, how many people in Liberia participate in the commercial market versus how many more would participate if education, infrastructure and health care (remember Ebola?) were freely available.

    Curt Doolittle

    This is not true. There are always marginal people on the edge of society. Yet again you’ve demonstrated distribution-blindness.

    Only women do this. Men never do. Unless feminized by a single mother.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-15 15:21:00 UTC

  • Jonathan: —“This book is relevant here. There are models that predict low-IQ n

    https://www.amazon.com/Hive-Mind-Your-Nation-s-Matters/dp/150360067X/ref=tmm_pap_title_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid&srJon Jonathan: —“This book is relevant here. There are models that predict low-IQ nations will become indebted to high-IQ nations. Maining a high-IQ population is a requirement for a healthy economy and low corruption.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-15 11:36:00 UTC

  • NO ITS NOT FAUSTIAN (a) sovereignty/heroism and (b) lower impulsivity / higher s

    NO ITS NOT FAUSTIAN

    (a) sovereignty/heroism and (b) lower impulsivity / higher separation of mind and intuition/ lower susceptibility to ‘dream state'(conflation) higher tendency of ‘reality’, (c) higher incidence of neuroticism (worry, obsession, future orientation), (d) balance of verbal / spatial abilities. (e) lower clannishness.

    I know all of these are basically true but wether we possessed them all in prehistory (“Yaman”) or whether we evolved them since then, or some combination is hard to tell.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-13 15:07:00 UTC

  • Grades and Age demonstrate only that one is not terribly defective. The major va

    Grades and Age demonstrate only that one is not terribly defective.

    The major variations between groups and classes are (a) rate of maturity, (b) depth of sexual maturity (aggression, degree of success at pedomorphic reproduction), and (c) genetic quality (physical symmetry/health, impulsivity, conscientiousness, intelligence, gender symmetry. All of which can most easily be categorized under successful pedomorphic reproduction.

    Childhood is an artificial modern construct for the purpose of adding women to the workforce for the purpose of increasing tax revenues. This has culminated in the current generation as ‘infantilization’ of the millennials. however, a human being does not really ‘mature’ until past his or her prime mating years (25). Conversely, a human being can mentally mature in mid teens with sufficient responsibilities (female reproduction, male military service, and work).

    Women mature faster than men – men specialize and take longer.

    Blacks faster than middle easterners, faster than mediterraneans, faster than europeans, faster than east asians. Hence testosterone differences.

    The problem? Not enough stressors.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-13 14:53:00 UTC